Sign In
Create Account
3
Does somebody have that drivers? I have that graphics card on my HP notebook
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics (384 MB)
41 replies to this topic
#4
Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:36 AM
PainWarlock
-
- Members
-
- 140 posts
InsanelyMac Geek
- Gender:Male
Andy_Boy, on Nov 27 2008, 09:16 AM, said:
Does somebody have that drivers? I have that graphics card on my HP notebook
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics (384 MB)
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Graphics (384 MB)
#5
Posted 22 January 2009 - 10:04 AM
ronronron
-
- Members
-
- 17 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
PainWarlock, on Jan 22 2009, 06:36 AM, said:
whats the device id for the card?
Display:
Type: Display
Bus: PCI
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x9612
Revision ID: 0x0000
Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded
Displays:
Display:
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Depth: 32-bit Color
Core Image: Software
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Quartz Extreme: Not Supported
#6
Posted 01 February 2009 - 08:03 AM
Mushishi
-
- Members
-
- 408 posts
InsanelyMac Sage
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sveg, Sweden
RadeonHD Mobillity are not supported.. Been told around a million times. And before you complain. Notebook RadeonHD cards are mobillity so your card is not supported
#7
Posted 01 February 2009 - 03:32 PM
Takinarios :)
-
- Members
-
- 10 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
Its not suported or no one made a driver for it?
There is HD 3200 for desktops too.
~topic Waiting drivers too.
There is HD 3200 for desktops too.
~topic Waiting drivers too.
#8
Posted 01 February 2009 - 03:55 PM
Mushishi
-
- Members
-
- 408 posts
InsanelyMac Sage
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sveg, Sweden
The framebuffers from ATI dont support mobillity cards, meaning they dont wsupport the outputs on the mobillity cards.. read the sticky by Krazubu about ati cards (http://forum.insanel...howtopic=149781)
And becouse of that the internel connecter on the mobillity card is not supported bu the framebuffers of the desktop version. The desktop versions are looking after something like VGA/DVI - VGA/VGA - DVI/DVI where the mobillity cards use LVDS as the internel connector.
And beside the is no framebuffer that support the desktop version of the 3200... Generam speaking onboard RadeonHD cards dont work. But read the sticky by Krazubu that might clear things up on why the mobillity cards dont work.
And becouse of that the internel connecter on the mobillity card is not supported bu the framebuffers of the desktop version. The desktop versions are looking after something like VGA/DVI - VGA/VGA - DVI/DVI where the mobillity cards use LVDS as the internel connector.
And beside the is no framebuffer that support the desktop version of the 3200... Generam speaking onboard RadeonHD cards dont work. But read the sticky by Krazubu that might clear things up on why the mobillity cards dont work.
#9
Posted 15 May 2009 - 04:00 PM
tiger2wander
-
- Members
-
- 40 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
My specs is:
Display:
Type: Display
Bus: PCI
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x9612
Revision ID: 0x0000
Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded
Displays:
Display:
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Depth: 32-Bit Color
Core Image: Software
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Quartz Extreme: Not Supported
QuartzGL: Supported
I'm used OSX86Tools to enable QE/GL on this card then that is my result after reboot.
Still waiting for netkas make it better
Display:
Type: Display
Bus: PCI
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x9612
Revision ID: 0x0000
Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded
Displays:
Display:
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Depth: 32-Bit Color
Core Image: Software
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Quartz Extreme: Not Supported
QuartzGL: Supported
I'm used OSX86Tools to enable QE/GL on this card then that is my result after reboot.Still waiting for netkas make it better
#10
Posted 17 October 2009 - 07:18 PM
dheep
-
- Members
-
- 19 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
tiger2wander, on May 15 2009, 08:00 PM, said:
01:05.0 VGAcompatible controller : ATI Technologies Inc RS780M/RS780MN [Radeon HD 3200 Graphics] ==> Using natit.kext for 10.5.7: Resolution still 1024x768 and QE/GL working using software
Fren, natit.kext - is that the package published in netkas.org? QE/GL working using "software" - do you mean OSX86 Tools?
Clear up.. If there anything promising.. Am tired of browser's blurry text with the dumbest resolution..
#11
Posted 17 October 2009 - 07:49 PM
Mushishi
-
- Members
-
- 408 posts
InsanelyMac Sage
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sveg, Sweden
tiger2wander, on May 15 2009, 05:00 PM, said:
My specs is:
Display:
Type: Display
Bus: PCI
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x9612
Revision ID: 0x0000
Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded
Displays:
Display:
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Depth: 32-Bit Color
Core Image: Software
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Quartz Extreme: Not Supported
QuartzGL: Supported
I'm used OSX86Tools to enable QE/GL on this card then that is my result after reboot.
Still waiting for netkas make it better
Display:
Type: Display
Bus: PCI
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x9612
Revision ID: 0x0000
Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded
Displays:
Display:
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Depth: 32-Bit Color
Core Image: Software
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Quartz Extreme: Not Supported
QuartzGL: Supported
I'm used OSX86Tools to enable QE/GL on this card then that is my result after reboot.Still waiting for netkas make it better
Are you just stupid or what.. you havent enablet QE/CI at all... it will always be supported when the driver aint loaded... And QuartzGL is a joke that wont help anything... You just waisted a post on nothing...
To the rest of you... ATI RadeonHD 3200 DONT and WONT work... no matter if it is a desktop or a mobility version... And it is the same in Snow Leopard...
#12
Posted 03 January 2010 - 10:29 AM
macTc
-
- Just Joined
-
- 1 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
Mushishi, on Oct 17 2009, 07:49 PM, said:
Are you just stupid or what.. you havent enablet QE/CI at all... it will always be supported when the driver aint loaded... And QuartzGL is a joke that wont help anything... You just waisted a post on nothing...
To the rest of you... ATI RadeonHD 3200 DONT and WONT work... no matter if it is a desktop or a mobility version... And it is the same in Snow Leopard...
To the rest of you... ATI RadeonHD 3200 DONT and WONT work... no matter if it is a desktop or a mobility version... And it is the same in Snow Leopard...
Dude... here is one FULLY working.
#13
Posted 03 January 2010 - 11:22 AM
Mushishi
-
- Members
-
- 408 posts
InsanelyMac Sage
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sveg, Sweden
macTc, on Jan 3 2010, 11:29 AM, said:
Dude... here is one FULLY working.
And where do you see fully working.. yes he got full res, he can open safari big deal.. he dont show the Graphics tab at all and i wil bet you it will say Core Image Software and Quatz Extreme Not Supported
#14
Posted 25 February 2010 - 03:12 PM
Snakedriver
-
- Members
-
- 25 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
- Gender:Male
- Location:Germany
- Interests:About Mac OSx86 :)
Hello guys, Thank you,
are you faker for ATI Radeon HD Drivers? STOP please Problem with supportting drivers...
I have Display driver HD Radeon 3200 Mobility on HP NoteBook Campag. Why did you fake about poor display drivers? Why do you not develop with display driver files?
If you are adavanced than you can to build a drive - files for display cards ATI Radeon HD all supporrting cards?
On my Computer has Display driver ATI Radeon HD 2600 xt Siere. But my hard disk drive do not support with Snow Leopard. Because hard disk are very old. But i have been bought computer by Siemens Fujistu latast 2 1/2 years.. But my computer is still working fine.. Why do any drivers not support?? If you do not build drivers for Mac OS X Snow Leopard.
Snow Leopard was known HP Universal Webcam - Fine! Nice! That is not faking. Is ay really.
Please develop now! Than you public important drive installer like MSI Analyser for supportted drivers for computers and laptops...
WTF? Do not worry for Mac OS X Leopard / Snow Leopard! Make sure your love for Mac OS X Versions! Understand?
Thanks and bestr egards, SnakeMedia
are you faker for ATI Radeon HD Drivers? STOP please Problem with supportting drivers...
I have Display driver HD Radeon 3200 Mobility on HP NoteBook Campag. Why did you fake about poor display drivers? Why do you not develop with display driver files?
If you are adavanced than you can to build a drive - files for display cards ATI Radeon HD all supporrting cards?
On my Computer has Display driver ATI Radeon HD 2600 xt Siere. But my hard disk drive do not support with Snow Leopard. Because hard disk are very old. But i have been bought computer by Siemens Fujistu latast 2 1/2 years.. But my computer is still working fine.. Why do any drivers not support?? If you do not build drivers for Mac OS X Snow Leopard.
Snow Leopard was known HP Universal Webcam - Fine! Nice! That is not faking. Is ay really.
Please develop now! Than you public important drive installer like MSI Analyser for supportted drivers for computers and laptops...
WTF? Do not worry for Mac OS X Leopard / Snow Leopard! Make sure your love for Mac OS X Versions! Understand?
Thanks and bestr egards, SnakeMedia
#15
Posted 25 February 2010 - 03:25 PM
DieBuche
-
- Members
-
- 85 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
Dude, the xorg guys needed years till they got a stable ati driver...
A graphic driver is not something you sit down one afternoon and are finished the next morning,
especially if u got only very insufficient info about the internals of the card..
A graphic driver is not something you sit down one afternoon and are finished the next morning,
especially if u got only very insufficient info about the internals of the card..
Joe Corner reeve, on Feb 25 2010, 04:12 PM, said:
Please develop now! Than you public important drive installer like MSI Analyser for supportted drivers for computers and laptops...
#16
Posted 26 February 2010 - 06:21 AM
Matt K.
-
- Members
-
- 28 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
- Gender:Male
- Location:Oregon
- Interests:My friends, my family, my computer. Jogging, fencing, aikido, kendo. Reading, writing, drawing,...
I'm a total newb about driver programming and all that, but how hard would it be to port the Mobility Radeon HD drivers from Linux to Mac? Seriously ... they're both based on Unix, and the HD3200 is fully supported on my Ubuntu laptop. This is the one thing keeping me from diving back into Hackintosh. I know it would be a big project, but a substantial amount of wannabe-Hackintoshers are ATI users.
So tell me, would that be possible?
So tell me, would that be possible?
#17
Posted 27 February 2010 - 11:30 AM
dastan
-
- Members
-
- 69 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
Matt K., on Feb 26 2010, 06:21 AM, said:
I'm a total newb about driver programming and all that, but how hard would it be to port the Mobility Radeon HD drivers from Linux to Mac? Seriously ... they're both based on Unix, and the HD3200 is fully supported on my Ubuntu laptop. This is the one thing keeping me from diving back into Hackintosh. I know it would be a big project, but a substantial amount of wannabe-Hackintoshers are ATI users.
So tell me, would that be possible?
So tell me, would that be possible?
you are very very right , please somebody do that
#18
Posted 27 February 2010 - 11:57 AM
Mushishi
-
- Members
-
- 408 posts
InsanelyMac Sage
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sveg, Sweden
If it is so easy why dont you 2 do it then.
1 problem.
Osx is not based on any thing close to the linux fork of unix... Osx is based of BSD.
And it is not even easy to port stuff from BSD to Osx so it is even more hard to do from Linux.
And beside that linux and osx handles the kernel calls, and way to list the drives diffrent.
1 problem.
Osx is not based on any thing close to the linux fork of unix... Osx is based of BSD.
And it is not even easy to port stuff from BSD to Osx so it is even more hard to do from Linux.
And beside that linux and osx handles the kernel calls, and way to list the drives diffrent.
#19
Posted 05 March 2010 - 01:44 PM
Snakedriver
-
- Members
-
- 25 posts
InsanelyMac Protégé
- Gender:Male
- Location:Germany
- Interests:About Mac OSx86 :)
@Mushishi
But, but dear Mushishi Please believe me really! That is trick of glxgears
Under linux has glxgears. Did you know sure...? and also glxinfo
I have found glxgears from Mac OS X. That Mac OS X isn't BSD version as Mac OS X was built by linux/unix.
Look at diirectory: /Volumes/<Hardisk-Name>/usr/X11/bin/glxgears
What do i say?
Why is Mac OS X not a BSD version? Becasue Mac OS X has 80 % for linux/unix and 20 % for BSD Version.
Example: Shell script? *.sh like Linux/Unix, too
Click bin files:
For Mac OS X: executing image to disk image mounter
For Linux/Unix: shell working once Runner like *.run, *.bin
That is different..
Thanks.. best regards, Snakedriver
But, but dear Mushishi Please believe me really! That is trick of glxgears
Under linux has glxgears. Did you know sure...? and also glxinfo
I have found glxgears from Mac OS X. That Mac OS X isn't BSD version as Mac OS X was built by linux/unix.
Look at diirectory: /Volumes/<Hardisk-Name>/usr/X11/bin/glxgears
What do i say?
Why is Mac OS X not a BSD version? Becasue Mac OS X has 80 % for linux/unix and 20 % for BSD Version.
Example: Shell script? *.sh like Linux/Unix, too
Click bin files:
For Mac OS X: executing image to disk image mounter
For Linux/Unix: shell working once Runner like *.run, *.bin
That is different..
Thanks.. best regards, Snakedriver
#20
Posted 05 March 2010 - 02:11 PM
Mushishi
-
- Members
-
- 408 posts
InsanelyMac Sage
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sveg, Sweden
Snakedriver you need to learn A LOT before posting again.
shell scripts is a part of the shell (Where osx uses bash as defaults and so do some linuxes but bash was a unix shell and is also used in bsd (The .sh or what ever you will like to call it because the naming after the . dont matter, the chmod +x name matters so you can for that sake have a shell script named whatever.shellscript as long you set it +x for executebel))
Next i guess you will say that bash is build of dos because you can use dir in it.
Here you have the opensource parts from osx, witch even apple say is a bsd (That you even can build and install (Was called OpenDarwin when it was a stand alone system)) http://www.opensource.apple.com/
And just to kill your linux thoughts even more this is a quote from the osx wiki page:
Mac OS X, whose "X" represents the Roman numeral for "10" and is a prominent part of its brand identity, is a Unix-based operating system,[5] built on technologies developed at NeXT between the second half of the 1980s and Apple's purchase of the company in late 1996. Its sixth release Mac OS X v10.5 "Leopard" gained UNIX 03 certification while running on Intel processors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and a bit longer this is stated on the same wiki page:
Mac OS X is based upon the Mach kernel.[9] Certain parts from FreeBSD's and NetBSD's implementation of Unix were incorporated in Nextstep, the core of Mac OS X. Nextstep was the object-oriented operating system developed by Steve Jobs' company NeXT after he left Apple in 1985.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X
So please next time you want to play cleaver to a long time osx and linux user read up on your stuff so they dont shoot you down after.
shell scripts is a part of the shell (Where osx uses bash as defaults and so do some linuxes but bash was a unix shell and is also used in bsd (The .sh or what ever you will like to call it because the naming after the . dont matter, the chmod +x name matters so you can for that sake have a shell script named whatever.shellscript as long you set it +x for executebel))
Next i guess you will say that bash is build of dos because you can use dir in it.
Here you have the opensource parts from osx, witch even apple say is a bsd (That you even can build and install (Was called OpenDarwin when it was a stand alone system)) http://www.opensource.apple.com/
And just to kill your linux thoughts even more this is a quote from the osx wiki page:
Mac OS X, whose "X" represents the Roman numeral for "10" and is a prominent part of its brand identity, is a Unix-based operating system,[5] built on technologies developed at NeXT between the second half of the 1980s and Apple's purchase of the company in late 1996. Its sixth release Mac OS X v10.5 "Leopard" gained UNIX 03 certification while running on Intel processors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and a bit longer this is stated on the same wiki page:
Mac OS X is based upon the Mach kernel.[9] Certain parts from FreeBSD's and NetBSD's implementation of Unix were incorporated in Nextstep, the core of Mac OS X. Nextstep was the object-oriented operating system developed by Steve Jobs' company NeXT after he left Apple in 1985.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X
So please next time you want to play cleaver to a long time osx and linux user read up on your stuff so they dont shoot you down after.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users