mobyte Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 hi, have made a quick test render under Cinema4D on my hackintosh E6600 2.4GHz and a Macbook Pro 2.2GHz Hackintosh 4gb ram Macbook pro 2GB ram the file for test is a hdri scene that found under C4D library (3 metal spheres) hackintosh result: 42 secondes macbook pro rsult 38 secondes is not a big difference but the macbook is suposed to be a little slower someone have a clue ? thank you Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/61999-hackintosh-vs-macbook-pro-3d-render/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoyanf Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Seems your desktop is very slow compared to the MacBook as you'd have to remember MacBook utilizes integrated graphic shared memory and its only 2GB but your Desktop is 7900GS with 4GB... Not comparing your Baracuda to you MacBook HDD (normally its a 4200rpm toshiba) Something for you to ponder.... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/61999-hackintosh-vs-macbook-pro-3d-render/#findComment-439511 Share on other sites More sharing options...
antic Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Seems your desktop is very slow compared to the MacBook as you'd have to remember MacBook utilizes integrated graphic shared memory and its only 2GB but your Desktop is 7900GS with 4GB... Not comparing your Baracuda to you MacBook HDD (normally its a 4200rpm toshiba) Something for you to ponder.... He dosn't have a macbook. He has a macbook pro. That's something for you to ponder. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/61999-hackintosh-vs-macbook-pro-3d-render/#findComment-439521 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zealot Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 He dosn't have a macbook. He has a macbook pro. That's something for you to ponder. Thats true . Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/61999-hackintosh-vs-macbook-pro-3d-render/#findComment-439571 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobyte Posted September 2, 2007 Author Share Posted September 2, 2007 hmm not funny i'm go search about efi things or try another natit or titan or or...grrr the hard disk have no incidence for render... only cpu work here and just for info, yhe macbook pro 2.2 have a 5400 rpm hd (120gb) thank you friendly Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/61999-hackintosh-vs-macbook-pro-3d-render/#findComment-440501 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinface Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Hackintosh only uses one core...so there you go...your ONE core on your desktop is ALMOST as fast as the dual core macbook...unless im wrong and there is a patch to run OSX86 on both cores now...I don't know seeing as how my IDE drive cooked an now I can't run 86 anymore...stupid jas not making a patch for nforce4's... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/61999-hackintosh-vs-macbook-pro-3d-render/#findComment-441871 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobyte Posted September 5, 2007 Author Share Posted September 5, 2007 Tinface, it's simple to check if the render under cinema4d use two cores... the windows render is divided par two render process it's very strange that core duo 2 e6600 2.4 is slower than a core duo 2.2 T7500 (macbook pro santa rosa) the 3D render have no depend GPU or else..it's CPU only. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/61999-hackintosh-vs-macbook-pro-3d-render/#findComment-442409 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts