Jump to content
10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

so i have installed leopard on my 17" mbp with a 2.4 ghz c2d and it is fast, except for the UI. on my 12" powerbook with a 1.5 ghz g4, the UI is MUCH faster. why would a GeForce FX Go5200 on a 1024X768 display be faster than a NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT on a 1920x1200 display. i am mostly talking about dragging windows around. on the macbook pro it is slow and on the PB it is like it is on tiger. do u think this is because i put leopard on a 20 GB partition and the PB it takes up the whole 80 GB hard drive?

so i have installed leopard on my 17" mbp with a 2.4 ghz c2d and it is fast, except for the UI. on my 12" powerbook with a 1.5 ghz g4, the UI is MUCH faster. why would a GeForce FX Go5200 on a 1024X768 display be faster than a NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT on a 1920x1200 display. i am mostly talking about dragging windows around. on the macbook pro it is slow and on the PB it is like it is on tiger. do u think this is because i put leopard on a 20 GB partition and the PB it takes up the whole 80 GB hard drive?

 

1024x768 = 786,432 individual pixels

1920x1200 = 2,304,000 individual pixels

 

Your 8600GT has roughly 3 times as many pixels to push per frame as your GeForceFX 5200.

 

This also means the memory bandwidth required has increased by around 3 fold too. While the actual graphics chip has increased in performance by well over 3 times the memory bandwidth of the gfx chip has not increased by threefold = 'slower graphics'.

 

thingi

1024x768 = 786,432 individual pixels

1920x1200 = 2,304,000 individual pixels

 

Your 8600GT has roughly 3 times as many pixels to push per frame as your GeForceFX 5200.

 

This also means the memory bandwidth required has increased by around 3 fold too. While the actual graphics chip has increased in performance by well over 3 times the memory bandwidth of the gfx chip has not increased by threefold = 'slower graphics'.

 

thingi

yes nvidia usually has drivers that arent very good :(

×
×
  • Create New...