Ferio Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 I'm going to upgrade and really have doubts if I should go for AMD or Intel for music production. AMD Spec CPU AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Cooler Noctua-D15 cooler Motherboard ASRock X370 Taichi Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-3200C16D-32GVK Graphics Geforce GTX 970 Intel Spec CPU Intel 7700K Cooler Noctua-D15 cooler Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z270X-UD5 Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-3200C16D-32GVK Graphics Geforce GTX 970 With previous Intel builds I had no problems with upgrading, it ran very stable and could upgrade without problems. I know it will work great. AMD however, has such a good deal with the 1700x, specially multi-core that is used in music production that I'm considering going AMD after years of Intel. I'm afraid tho that I will run into problems such as stability, components that may not work and upgrading the OS. Could someone enlighten me what the current situation is with AMD hackintosh? Cheers! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberdevs Posted June 22, 2017 Share Posted June 22, 2017 I'm going to upgrade and really have doubts if I should go for AMD or Intel for music production. AMD Spec CPU AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Cooler Noctua-D15 cooler Motherboard ASRock X370 Taichi Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-3200C16D-32GVK Graphics Geforce GTX 970 Intel Spec CPU Intel 7700K Cooler Noctua-D15 cooler Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z270X-UD5 Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-3200C16D-32GVK Graphics Geforce GTX 970 With previous Intel builds I had no problems with upgrading, it ran very stable and could upgrade without problems. I know it will work great. AMD however, has such a good deal with the 1700x, specially multi-core that is used in music production that I'm considering going AMD after years of Intel. I'm afraid tho that I will run into problems such as stability, components that may not work and upgrading the OS. Could someone enlighten me what the current situation is with AMD hackintosh? Cheers! IMHO as amazing as the AMD architecture sounds, I suggest to go with the Intel. Apple never used AMD CPUs in any of their machines, they use Intel. It's more stable and more hassle free. I use my build for occasional music recording and mostly to use GarageBand and Logic Pro for their Amp collections and Loops and it never failed me. But about the KabyLake processors for full functionality you have to be a little bit patient until the next update for macOS Sierra or the official release of the macOS High Sierra, otherwise you'll have to use FakeCPUID for you CPU in clover. Using a FakeCPU ID is not a big deal but it's better to have full support rather than using and extra setting to make the OS to think that it's using another CPU. So the final decision is yours and yours alone but at least you have my point of view. 1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2449551 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferio Posted June 24, 2017 Author Share Posted June 24, 2017 Thank you. AMD sounds great for their price, but I prefer stability. I will be going for intel then. Thanks! 1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2450618 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberdevs Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Thank you. AMD sounds great for their price, but I prefer stability. I will be going for intel then. Thanks! You're welcome. Yes the price is appealing and AMD is great for many things, but hackintosh is not one of them.(IMHO) Good luck with you hackintosh Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2450622 Share on other sites More sharing options...
gills83 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 I would say that the instability is due to improper installation of the peripherals, the audio / video support is complete provided that devices are compatible, nV is not very compatible and can lead to problems of instability. For having used Premiérepro and logicproX, I have not encountered any problem with CPU AMD, the CPU is there only for calculation, all its instructions work and the performances are even superior to Windows according to the softwares. Certainly the kernel needs to be optimized but I have no stability problems, I noticed mostly problems with nV, I think the same as with Intel, lack of general performance, I had already Seen with my old configuration i7 3930K / GTX 950 / HD 7950. With the AMD GPUs, I have not noticed anything bad, also losses of OpenGL performance with the arrival of Metal, other OS like El Capitan or Yosemite, graphics performance are very good close to Windows. Apple is wrong to do without 3 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2450630 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferio Posted June 26, 2017 Author Share Posted June 26, 2017 I would say that the instability is due to improper installation of the peripherals, the audio / video support is complete provided that devices are compatible, nV is not very compatible and can lead to problems of instability. For having used Premiérepro and logicproX, I have not encountered any problem with CPU AMD, the CPU is there only for calculation, all its instructions work and the performances are even superior to Windows according to the softwares. Certainly the kernel needs to be optimized but I have no stability problems, I noticed mostly problems with nV, I think the same as with Intel, lack of general performance, I had already Seen with my old configuration i7 3930K / GTX 950 / HD 7950. With the AMD GPUs, I have not noticed anything bad, also losses of OpenGL performance with the arrival of Metal, other OS like El Capitan or Yosemite, graphics performance are very good close to Windows. Apple is wrong to do without So you are saying I could go with AMD too? What matters for me the most is that audio production works well, without issues and AMD seems to score better in this. For gaming I have windows anyway and could do with 1700x or 1800x. The only thing I would be missing is Thunderbolt, but could always exchange the motherboard in the future when they make it for AMD boards too. I believe intel has released te patent or something. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2451734 Share on other sites More sharing options...
gills83 Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 just with Screen Flow 6.1 The video video of the video .... I would make another video with Logic Pro X ScreenFlow1.mp4.zip Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2451885 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferio Posted June 27, 2017 Author Share Posted June 27, 2017 Looking good. What are your components? I'm still thinking to go with AMD since it just beats intel for video editing/music production. Was it easy to setup? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2452052 Share on other sites More sharing options...
gills83 Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 I am not a specialist in audio composition, Logic Pro X is very complex and far exceeds my competence in the matter. hardware ? Simple, no need for patch specific phantom that serves no purpose, a kernel and 4 kexts and works as well on chameleon as clover. Asus Prime B350-MA // HD 7950 // HDD Samsung 103 SJ 1 T // M-AUDIO SUPER DAC II // box Fractal slim video : https://www.partage-fichiers.com/upload/41gdagtm Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/324674-how-stable-is-an-amd-build-for-hackintosh/#findComment-2452382 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts