mendietinha Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 all nice and buttery Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103355 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiee Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Patched kexts (broken signature) on /S/L/E are loaded as usual. Good to hear! But I'd also really wonder if they would disable that. I mean in that case, if you want to develop a kext you'd have to sign it even before it exists. So I hope this "hole" will be open for us for quite some time. The only case where I see a potential problem is with the native Apple kexts, so we could have problems with TrimEnabler and AppleHDA patches in the future. 1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103415 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky1979 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 if you want to develop a kext you'd have to sign it even before it exists. mmmh, yes and not Devs always have (or can have) a signed kext when building because the keychain always contain the certificate of their paid Dev Account, and Xcode "Buil Phases" can contain the script to automatically sign that kext every time a Dev push the "Build" button.. kext-dev-mode was only to help those who had not yet paid their $100 So I hope this "hole" will be open for us for quite some time Agreed! 2 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103423 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiee Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Devs always have (or can have) a signed kext when building because the keychain always contain the certificate of their paid Dev Account, and Xcode "Buil Phases" can contain the script to automatically sign that kext every time a Dev push the "Build" button.. kext-dev-mode was only to help those who had not yet paid their $100 Oh, thanks for the clarification. But well, now I am not so optimistic anymore .... so we'll see. But I admit I am worrying ... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103453 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky1979 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 But well, now I am not so optimistic anymore .... so we'll see. But I admit I am worrying ... Ha ha ha, be optimistic, sometimes I talk too much Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103457 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiee Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Ha ha ha, be optimistic, sometimes I talk too much I am not optimistic, I am realistic But frankly: don't you see Apple locking down OS X more and more since 10.9? Or am I hallucinating? So why should they stop at this point? Why not make a (paid) developer account mandatory? So they can lock down the OS even more (and this lock could be quite serious, just try to boot your hack without kext-dev-mode), prevent "anonymous" software and earn even more money - all at once. Sounds like a good plan, right? And the realist in me says that this will be coming. Not that I want that, but mark my words! Then some will finally have their "real challenge" ... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103461 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky1979 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 In the past peoples had to pay for everything. Now OS is Free, Xcode is free (with Microsoft you have to pay for everything). I do not think that a developer account will continue to cost so much in the future, but unfortunately they also will want to know who built a driver and go for verification (like happen for the sand boxes applications in the MAS). Yes, this will happen sooner or later (in 10.11?), but I do not think that will cover Yosemite. Ok, I'll stop talking Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103469 Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiee Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Ok, I'll stop talking Unfortunately, you may be right. But I also stop talking, speculating makes not much sense at this moment. I'd say, let's wait for 6/8/2015. Then we may get some more information. 1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103522 Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattsCreative Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 all modded kexts load still no issues Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103543 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfesq Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 OK, I had no problems whatsoever installing build 14C99d. However, now that it's installed, I've noticed that my wifi drops out after a few hours. I have to turn wifi off and turn it back on and the problem goes away. The prior version had better wifi IMO. Wifi was one of the areas that 10.10.2 focused on. I hope they get it right before the final release. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2103656 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayang-NT Posted January 21, 2015 Author Share Posted January 21, 2015 new seed ... 14C106a 2 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2104529 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mendietinha Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 all good Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2104607 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayang-NT Posted January 22, 2015 Author Share Posted January 22, 2015 public beta seed with the same build ... 2 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2104631 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenote56 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 installed.. same old story I had to install hd 3000 audio and trim again. Preview app. still messy. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2104676 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballistic Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 installed.. same old story I had to install hd 3000 audio and trim again. Preview app. still messy.I use Clover and didn't have to re-apply anything. Trim is patched on-the-fly at boot and extra drivers are injected at boot too. OSX volume always remains vanilla :-) No I'm not trying to sell Clover, it s just my personal experience. 1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2104856 Share on other sites More sharing options...
@ROBASEFR Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Same here ! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2105342 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Deal Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 I use Clover and didn't have to re-apply anything. Trim is patched on-the-fly at boot and extra drivers are injected at boot too. OSX volume always remains vanilla :-) No I'm not trying to sell Clover, it s just my personal experience. FakeSMC, patched AppleHDA, everything? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2105536 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniac10 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Personally I use Clover to load FakeSMC + plugins, Mieze's Realtek and Toleda's realtekALC kexts. As for AppleHDA, if you use Toleda's method you won't need to re-patch as it doesn't overwrite the kext but add files instead. So for now thanks to Clover + Toleda's patch (any other similar solution should work too) I've got an update proof system. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2105564 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballistic Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 FakeSMC, patched AppleHDA, everything? I use a USB D to A for audio so no Kexts needed for that. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2105620 Share on other sites More sharing options...
archfan Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 It's certainly possible to have AppleHDA patched by Clover. One advantage is that you keep your audio functionality even after major system upgrades. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2105633 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Deal Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Yes i used this solution a long time ago but my PC was subject to random freezes with this. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/302788-pre-release-os-x-yosemite-10102/page/5/#findComment-2105802 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts