Jump to content

Tech Gurus Say They'll 'Switch from Mac'


4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts



Daniel Drew Turner - eWEEK Thu Jun 22, 5:55 PM ET


Playing on Apple's past "Switch" ad campaign, which was aimed at getting Windows users to migrate to Apple's Mac

OS X-based computers, a few longtime Mac and open-source gurus are vocally publicizing their switch away from Apple's platform to more open-source solutions.


Though the practical impact is impossible to gauge, their arguments have been making waves.


The first was Mark Pilgrim, who wrote free software for the Mac in the mid-1990s.


He is involved with various current open-source projects, was a certified Mac OS X trainer and has written about Web site accessibility and scripting.


In a post on his blog, Pilgrim wrote that though he has long been impressed by Apple's hardware and software, he thought that the latter had grown less attractive and more "restrictive," leading him to seek alternatives.

Pilgrim wrote that he regretted that Apple's software, including the operating system, was not open-source (Pilgrim has published software under the GNU GPL [General Public License]; the license states that software published under it includes the source code, which users can modify to their liking as long as they document the changes.)


He noted that most applications he uses are so open—"Why keep running them on an operating system that costs money and restricts my rights and my usage?"


Part of Mac OS X is already open-source.


Click here to read more about the Linux community's reaction to Windows on Macs.


Darwin, the

Unix foundations of the operating system, is available under the APSL (Apple Public Source License), a free software license.


The APSL is not compatible with the GPL, however, because it does not force developers using it to release their software for free. And no other part of Mac OS X, from its user interface layer to the applications (and their file formats), is open source.


Pilgrim's argument was that non-open software often ties user data to a proprietary file format.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is so much inaccuracy about open source software in that article that I don't know where to begin! As for his supposed "data loss" from iPhoto and iTunes database corruption, that is utter nonsense. The data files aren't stored in the database, it is simply an index of the files in other folders. You would think a programmer would know the difference. The article seems to be just a shill piece for Ubunto Linux (notice that it is the only distro mentioned by name?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Create New...