Jump to content
21 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Brand new Pentium D 830 over here. Both cores were recognized and used, and everything is running like a dream. I think I'm going to sell my AMD box in the next days :angry:

 

Edit: If you can get an Intel D945GNTL or D945GNTLR mobo and a copy of Jas 10.4.6 DVD installer, everything, I mean everything, will be automagically recognized and set up, so you won't have to mess with patches and such.

Yes. Stereo output, mic input and line input work ok. I tried first with Myzar disc, and sound/network were not recognized, so I had to use the sigmatel and IONetworking patches. After Jas DVD download finished, I installed again and everything worked out of the box. I even got a noticeable speed boost in rosseta apps, and 5 or 6 extra points in Xbench (if that means something).

AldousHxIE - I've got a single core Pentium 4 630HT that is set at 3.0 Ghz in my bios but registers in profiler as a 3.8Ghz 2CPU processor (xbench below). TopazBar lists a possible fix here for this but I haven't tried it so I can't confirm it's effectiveness

Proteo - Surprisingly, I thought my XBench scores were rather low considering the hardware I got running OSx86. On average, I score between a 78 and 79. What are you getting, just out of curiousity?

 

kernalzero - Truth is, Im not too concerned with fixing the speed reading. As long as my system works the way it should, it could tell me Im running a damn Pentium Pro processor for all I care. lol

 

I still remember almost having a heartattack when I first opened About This Mac after upgrading OSx86 to 10.4.4 lol

 

Edit: BTW, I think its seeing your single core Pentium 4 processor as 2 CPUs because OSx86 mistakes HyperThreading as two distinctly separate cores. Can anyone verify that?

AldousHxlE - I'll agree your xBench scores do seem alittle low. If you have an LCD you could turn off beam sync, if you have a CRT it's not worth it, too many bugs produced. look for a program called quartzsimple (or pm me). I would use this software to test it out because you have to repeat it after a reboot (so it's not permenant). There is a permenant method to disable it though. See if that boosts your xbench.

 

thanks for the explanation of why it sees 2 cpus, i've been curious about that like you've been wondering about why your cpu isn't being picked up right

Wow, what a difference! Disabling BeamSync raised my XBench score to 102.09! Pretty sweet.

 

I too am using a CRT monitor, and I couldn't see any major graphical glitches like everyone else claims (Only noticed it when moving Finder windows around.) On the other hand, I noticed it kept some apps from loading, one being the SNES9x emulator. I just bounced infinitely on my dock until I killed it. I didnt really see any major performance improvements besides my XBench scores, so for now I'll keep things as is. But thanks for the cool tip.

Edit: BTW, I think its seeing your single core Pentium 4 processor as 2 CPUs because OSx86 mistakes HyperThreading as two distinctly separate cores. Can anyone verify that?

 

 

Ya - On my box it see's two cores even though I have one. I do have hyperthreading.

 

 

Turn off "beam sync" and your xbench scores will improve a lot.

Yeah I'm unsure of the ACTUAL gains from disabling beam sync. It does increase the xBench scores but if it does nothing else is it worth it and how valid are the xbench scores if it does nothing for you?

 

;) Does anyone know how much of a performance increase you get from doubling your DDR2? I'm thinking of moving from 1GB -> 2GB but wonder if it's worth the ~$90. Anyone have xbench scores to compare their systems with 1gb vs 2gb? i'd be interested to see that

Brand new Pentium D 830 over here. Both cores were recognized and used, and everything is running like a dream. I think I'm going to sell my AMD box in the next days :)

 

Edit: If you can get an Intel D945GNTL or D945GNTLR mobo and a copy of Jas 10.4.6 DVD installer, everything, I mean everything, will be automagically recognized and set up, so you won't have to mess with patches and such.

 

dude i have the Pentium D 920 woth motherboard 945GNTLR and i don't have sound working, i even had to patch it to make it work the LAN card.

 

And i have the iso 10.4.6.install.dvd.iso

 

thanks

just built my macintel with a Pentium D 805 2.66ghz last night, and i'm surfing the forums with it as we speak. it shows as a 3.8ghz. only thing i have to fix right now is sound. everything else seems to be working with the P5LD2-VM mobo! :whistle: i'll be installing windows 2k3 r2 or xp x64 next.

:graduated:

I dont' know the answer to this question so correct me if i'm wrong, but don't you have to install windows before any other os? I know when installing different versions of windows you have to install older versions before newer (98se then 2000 then XP) and then install linux if you want linux to 'dual' boot after windows is installed. I only assumed installing OSx86 would follow that pattern. I'm not dual booting any of my osx86 computers though so I could be wrong

kernalzero:

That really depends on your hardware setup. In my case, I have my Windows OSs on one hard drive, and OSx86 on another, so it didn't really matter in which order they were installed. As far as separate partitions within a single HDD, I think it does matter which order they are installed, but I'm honestly not sure what the order would be.

 

BTW, I've been meaning to test out OSx86 XBench scores using only 1GB of RAM to see if upgrading to 2GB is really worth the cost, but school has kept me very busy. If I can get it done this weekend, I'll post the results here.

:)

I dont' know the answer to this question so correct me if i'm wrong, but don't you have to install windows before any other os? I know when installing different versions of windows you have to install older versions before newer (98se then 2000 then XP) and then install linux if you want linux to 'dual' boot after windows is installed. I only assumed installing OSx86 would follow that pattern. I'm not dual booting any of my osx86 computers though so I could be wrong

 

i installed win2k3 after installing osx86 so no, order doesn't matter. as long as you have your partitions set up correctly, you should be good, as well as a boot manager that recognizes all your partitions you want to boot from. i did however have to set the osx86 partition back to "active" since windows insists on setting it's partition as active to boot and continue install.

 

long time ago, and i'm talking several years back ... i had 4 separate OS on one machine, dos/win95, winNT, os/2 and linux.

AldousHxlE - I appreciate and look forward to your benchmarking

 

isse03 - thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't sure and didn't want to see anyone lose an install simply because their order was wrong. I've had several OSes running on a single box before too without issues as long as you have a decent boot loader.

×
×
  • Create New...