Jump to content

Xbench (intel version) results of new iMac


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1
VaiOSX

VaiOSX

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 188 posts
http://db.xbench.com...tml?doc1=150870

http://db.xbench.com...tml?doc1=150688

http://db.xbench.com...tml?doc1=150801

#2
pion

pion

    =D

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 163 posts
man, these result are pretty {censored} lol. my Intel 650 beats it (score 76).

edit; ops enter wrong number. 650 3.4ghz

#3
stryder

stryder

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 235 posts
  • Location:Canada, eh!

man, these result are pretty {censored} lol. my Intel 640 beats it (score 76).


Yes, but for the price it's a nice machine. Your Intel 640 is a 3.2 GHz processor, with 800 MHz FSB, right? Just wait until Apple ships the Intel PowerMac's (I presume they will be called Mac Pro). That will be the power user's machine!

#4
VaiOSX

VaiOSX

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 188 posts
what is the Xbench result for an ADP machine ?

Anybody here can post it ?

Also, it would be good if we can get Xbench results (with a 8f1111a version) from new PCs with a Core Duo CPU to compare.

#5
cyrana

cyrana

    Prophetess of Doom

  • Retired
  • 1,462 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Somewhere out there
I don't think xbench does SMP so well, either, does it? And that machine doesn't have the fastest hard drive in it. Still seems slightly low though.

#6
mykell9999

mykell9999

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 36 posts
man that doesnt look good at all, my crappy p4 503 ( 2.66 ghz, single core, no HT ) machine has a score in the mid 60's, 66.xx more or less.

i thought they were supposed to be 3 -4x faster.............

#7
bjr1028

bjr1028

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 101 posts
xbench isn't a very useful benchmark. Its results tend is differ depending on the time of day.

#8
berehon

berehon

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 21 posts
Just look in UI tests of new imacs. It cant be correct. I cant believe that GMA900 two-three times faster then x1600.
It seems xbench doesn't love ati cards.
BTW on xbench.com there is a note about this.

Edited by berehon, 16 January 2006 - 02:52 PM.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2014 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   PHP hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy