Dr. Hurt Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I just noticed that there is no threads discussing this here so I though I'd start one. Highlights: - Intel Haswell 1.3GHz Core i5 with turbo boost up to 2.6GHz - Intel HD5000 graphics (aka. GT3 or Iris) - 12h and 9h battery life on the 13" and 11" models respectively, 30 days standby. - Samsung PCI-e SSD with read and write speeds approaching 800MB/s - The 11" now has a 128GB SSD as standard - WiFi 802.11ac (BCM4360) Those things just keep getting better and better with every update. I hope OS X 10.9 Maverick proves to be as exciting as the hardware it'll run on. So what do you guys think? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I think that, since it's already shipping, it's more than enough proof for the shy user that 10.8.4 will run on Haswell machines (as long as you use a MBA system definition, perhaps, but maybe even this is not needed). Nobody really needs to wait until the fall to buy current generation Intel hardware for their hacks. All the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Hurt Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 Indeed. But we'll have to wait till someone with a new MBA uploads their kexts and kernel. Or maybe Apple might release a supplementary update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Hm, i don't know: i think the current kernel will just work on Haswell CPUs, but since i don't have a Haswell, i cannot test. My guess is that you only need MBA latest definition for 10.8.4 to boot on Haswell/Intel 8-series hardware. All the best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Hurt Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 No, unfortunately the current 10.8.4 will not even boot on a Haswell system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackosx Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Maybe try patching the kernel? http://pikeralpha.wordpress.com 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts