Jump to content

Kayway users 10.5.1 please beware


crampy
 Share

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Type Port Services, Programs and Trojans that are commonly found to be running on this port.

tcp 22 pcAnywhere Status. Default udp status port for v2.0 thru v7.51; plus CE. Versions v8+ on use tcp 5631 & udp 5632.

Trojans or Viruses known to use this port are: Adore sshd. Shaft.

tcp 80 HTTP. Standard web service port. Exchange is cleartext; use https (443) for sensitive data transfers.

Trojans or Viruses known to use this port are: 711 trojan (Seven Eleven). AckCmd. Back End. Back Orifice 2000 Plug-Ins. Cafeini. CGI Backdoor. Executor. God Message. Hooker. IISworm. MTX. NCX. Noob. Ramen. Reverse WWW Tunnel Backdoor. RingZero. RTB 666. Seeker. WAN Remote. Web Server CT. WebDownloader.

tcp 5001 Sockets de Trojie Backdoor. Also infects tcp/udp 5000; 30303; 50505.

Trojans or Viruses known to use this port are: Back Door Setup. Sockets des Troie. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That post is rather garbled, but it seems you're saying that the ports:

 

22

80

5001

 

Are open on your install. 22 & 80 are dead normal (ssh & http) I don't offhand know what 5001 is used for, but before ringing alarm bells about Kalyway, have you compared this to stock os x running on a mac, and other osx86 distros like iATKOS or Brazilmac (and others)?

 

I seem to recall when 10.5 was released there was some talk of security holes. could these be the same ones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That post is rather garbled, but it seems you're saying that the ports:

 

22

80

5001

 

Are open on your install. 22 & 80 are dead normal (ssh & http) I don't offhand know what 5001 is used for, but before ringing alarm bells about Kalyway, have you compared this to stock os x running on a mac, and other osx86 distros like iATKOS or Brazilmac (and others)?

 

I seem to recall when 10.5 was released there was some talk of security holes. could these be the same ones?

 

 

I know it's garbled, I copied and pasted the results, sorry about. I'm not being ungrateful for all the hard work put into this, I'm just concerned that's all. Since this is 10.5.1 the security holes should have been patched, I believed that was the main reason for releasing .1. I hope someone can prove me wrong, also when I get a chance I will compare to a stock LEO dvd. Thanks for your reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...