buoo Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 mach_kernel 12.0.0 (OS X 10.8.0) mach_kernel_Atom 12.0.0.zip mach_kernel 12.1.0 (OS X 10.8.1) mach_kernel_Atom 12.1.0.zip mach_kernel 12.2.0 (OS X 10.8.2) mach_kernel_Atom 12.2.0.zip mach_kernel 12.3.0 (OS X 10.8.3) mach_kernel_Atom 12.3.0.zip 6 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 You guys should pin this one. Either here, or in the netbook sub forum. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847315 Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARKBOARD NETSET Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 on samsung n102 it boots until pci configuration ? tried -x & -f nothing any help Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847336 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Add npci=0x2000 to your boot flags! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847347 Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 @theconnactic Same here on asrock atom ion 330 pro it gets stuck at pci configuration begins even if i set "npci=2000".... i've also tried other ways to get past that screen but without success (with snow 10.6.8 it works perfectly)... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847757 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Did you try npci=0x3000 also? It works sometimes. Please report back anyway! Is important for us to know if the solution worked or not. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847801 Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Did you try npci=0x3000 also? It works sometimes. Please report back anyway! Is important for us to know if the solution worked or not. Ok, i've tried also npci=0x3000... nothing.... it always get stuck at this point: If it helps i've attached my E/E on the usb installation pendrive for troubleshooting (chameleon version is the latest one available in the official thread as today) Cheers Extra.zip Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847830 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Which method did you use to install Mountain Lion? Did you try to boot without the dsdt.aml? Maybe this solution works: http://netkas.org/?p=1053 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847850 Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Which method did you use to install Mountain Lion? Did you try to boot without the dsdt.aml? Maybe this solution works: http://netkas.org/?p=1053 Ok, i've tried with the patched iopcifamily.kext .... and it goes forward from the previous error, but now it stucks few lines down... (see screenshot)... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847884 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 You're stuck at DSMOS has arrived. That probably means graphics issues. Try GraphicsEnabler=Yes and report back here, please. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847891 Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefano.85 Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 I've tried to ovverride DSDT GFX injection with graphicenabler=yes ... nothing... it stucks always at the same point... it seems that my htpc doesn't like ML What makes me disappointed is the fact that in Snow it works without a glitch! ok... i know that there are so many variables... but... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847901 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Did you try to remove the dsdt.aml altogether? Of course, keep a back up of it before trying this. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1847903 Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSCXP2005 Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Hi to all, Which netbook would be the best to use with Mountain Lion? Thanks NSCXP2005 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848122 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 That's easy, a MacBook Air 11'! Just kidding: i would opt for an Asus 1201n, because of it's ability to get QE/CI enabled, since it has nVidia Ion graphics. Until now, we couldn't solve this issue for Intel GMA graphics in Mountain Lion. Anyway, it depends on your needs, expectations and budget. 1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848137 Share on other sites More sharing options...
splonk Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 Doesn't seem to work too well with the Dev release of 10.8.2. The kernel patches but the machine refuses to boot with it. Tried the patcher, tried patching manually by running the perl strings in Terminal but same result. Using the 10.8.1 Atom kernel with the update causes a KP. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848264 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 27, 2012 Share Posted August 27, 2012 What KP exactly? Could you attach a screenshot, please? Thank you! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848283 Share on other sites More sharing options...
meklort Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Doesn't seem to work too well with the Dev release of 10.8.2. I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848301 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Anyway, even for vanilla hacks, this update seems a little tricky (see the other topic). Sorry if the question (or the one who asks) sounds inept , but probably there will be changes between the dev. 10.8.2 and the final end-user 10.8.2 update, right? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848303 Share on other sites More sharing options...
splonk Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel. Ah. So this Atom patcher is a bit pointless, then? Pity. Would have been a neat solution without having to bug those that understand kernel development better to come up with an updated kernel for each point release. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848377 Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Sorry if the question (or the one who asks) sounds inept , but probably there will be changes between the dev. 10.8.2 and the final end-user 10.8.2 update, right? no doubt ! Apple can release many beta builds before the final public release, so many changes or not ! Some times, Apple modify many things, and some times, not so ! I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel. in the 10.8.1 beta builds (12B13, 12B17, 12B19), the addresses don't changed.... but in this first 10.8.2, clearly yes ! in the 12B13, we had the same 12.0.0 kernel, he changed to 12.1.0 in the 12B17 and stay the same in the 12B19 ! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848405 Share on other sites More sharing options...
meklort Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Ah. So this Atom patcher is a bit pointless, then? Pity. Would have been a neat solution without having to bug those that understand kernel development better to come up with an updated kernel for each point release. It's not pointless at all (well, this one might be), in fact I have a kernel patcher that goes and reads the correct addresses + patches everything appropriately (it's the same codebase as the KernelPatcher module for chameleon) 2 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848542 Share on other sites More sharing options...
theconnactic Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Really? That's great news indeed, Meklort! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848550 Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 I have a kernel patcher that goes and reads the correct addresses + patches everything appropriately (it's the same codebase as the KernelPatcher module for chameleon) And... can... you...share... it... here ? 1 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848610 Share on other sites More sharing options...
splonk Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 It's not pointless at all (well, this one might be), in fact I have a kernel patcher that goes and reads the correct addresses + patches everything appropriately (it's the same codebase as the KernelPatcher module for chameleon) Yes, I meant the script shared here. I know you have your own private patcher as nawcom mentioned on his blog. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848809 Share on other sites More sharing options...
meklort Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 There are some changes I need to make before it can be released, I'll see if I can do them this week. 2 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/282187-patched-mach_kernel-108x-for-atom-cpus/#findComment-1848829 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts