65 replies to this topic

[buoo]

 atom.gif   4.89KB   39 downloads


mach_kernel 12.0.0 (OS X 10.8.0)
 mach_kernel_Atom 12.0.0.zip   3.11MB   649 downloads

mach_kernel 12.1.0 (OS X 10.8.1)
 mach_kernel_Atom 12.1.0.zip   3.11MB   431 downloads

mach_kernel 12.2.0 (OS X 10.8.2)
 mach_kernel_Atom 12.2.0.zip   3.11MB   665 downloads

mach_kernel 12.3.0 (OS X 10.8.3)
 mach_kernel_Atom 12.3.0.zip   3.09MB   185 downloads

[theconnactic]

You guys should pin this one. Either here, or in the netbook sub forum.

[MARKSMART]

on samsung n102 it boots until pci configuration ? tried -x & -f nothing

any help

[theconnactic]

Add npci=0x2000 to your boot flags!

[stefano.85]

@theconnactic

Same here on asrock atom ion 330 pro it gets stuck at pci configuration begins even if i set "npci=2000".... i've also tried other ways to get past that screen but without success (with snow 10.6.8 it works perfectly)...

[theconnactic]

Did you try npci=0x3000 also? It works sometimes.

Please report back anyway! Is important for us to know if the solution worked or not.

[stefano.85]

Did you try npci=0x3000 also? It works sometimes.

Please report back anyway! Is important for us to know if the solution worked or not.

Ok, i've tried also npci=0x3000... nothing.... it always get stuck at this point:


 IMG_0232.JPG   496.41KB   208 downloads


If it helps i've attached my E/E on the usb installation pendrive for troubleshooting (chameleon version is the latest one available in the official thread as today)
Cheers


 Extra.zip   2.04MB   64 downloads

[theconnactic]

Which method did you use to install Mountain Lion?

Did you try to boot without the dsdt.aml?

Maybe this solution works: http://netkas.org/?p=1053

[stefano.85]

Which method did you use to install Mountain Lion?

Did you try to boot without the dsdt.aml?

Maybe this solution works: http://netkas.org/?p=1053

Ok, i've tried with the patched iopcifamily.kext .... and it goes forward from the previous error, but now it stucks few lines down... (see screenshot)...

Attached Files

•  foto (1).JPG   687.27KB   116 downloads

[theconnactic]

You're stuck at DSMOS has arrived. That probably means graphics issues. Try GraphicsEnabler=Yes and report back here, please.

[stefano.85]

I've tried to ovverride DSDT GFX injection with graphicenabler=yes ... nothing... it stucks always at the same point... it seems that my htpc doesn't like ML
What makes me disappointed is the fact that in Snow it works without a glitch! ok... i know that there are so many variables... but...

[theconnactic]

Did you try to remove the dsdt.aml altogether? Of course, keep a back up of it before trying this.

[NSCXP2005]

Hi to all,

Which netbook would be the best to use with Mountain Lion?

Thanks

NSCXP2005

[theconnactic]

That's easy, a MacBook Air 11'!

Just kidding: i would opt for an Asus 1201n, because of it's ability to get QE/CI enabled, since it has nVidia Ion graphics. Until now, we couldn't solve this issue for Intel GMA graphics in Mountain Lion. Anyway, it depends on your needs, expectations and budget.

[splonk]

Doesn't seem to work too well with the Dev release of 10.8.2. The kernel patches but the machine refuses to boot with it. Tried the patcher, tried patching manually by running the perl strings in Terminal but same result. Using the 10.8.1 Atom kernel with the update causes a KP.

[theconnactic]

What KP exactly? Could you attach a screenshot, please? Thank you!

[meklort]

Doesn't seem to work too well with the Dev release of 10.8.2.

I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel.

[theconnactic]

Anyway, even for vanilla hacks, this update seems a little tricky (see the other topic).

Sorry if the question (or the one who asks) sounds inept , but probably there will be changes between the dev. 10.8.2 and the final end-user 10.8.2 update, right?

[splonk]

I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel.

Ah. So this Atom patcher is a bit pointless, then? Pity. Would have been a neat solution without having to bug those that understand kernel development better to come up with an updated kernel for each point release.

[fantomas1]

Sorry if the question (or the one who asks) sounds inept , but probably there will be changes between the dev. 10.8.2 and the final end-user 10.8.2 update, right?

no doubt ! Apple can release many beta builds before the final public release, so many changes or not ! Some times, Apple modify many things, and some times, not so !

I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel.

in the 10.8.1 beta builds (12B13, 12B17, 12B19), the addresses don't changed.... but in this first 10.8.2, clearly yes !

in the 12B13, we had the same 12.0.0 kernel, he changed to 12.1.0 in the 12B17 and stay the same in the 12B19 !