Jump to content

Patched mach_kernel 10.8.X for Atom CPUs


  • Please log in to reply
70 replies to this topic

#1
buoo

buoo

    The Prodigal Son

  • Moderators
  • 4,536 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy
Attached File  atom.gif   4.89KB   59 downloads


mach_kernel 12.0.0 (OS X 10.8.0)
Attached File  mach_kernel_Atom 12.0.0.zip   3.11MB   1700 downloads

mach_kernel 12.1.0 (OS X 10.8.1)
Attached File  mach_kernel_Atom 12.1.0.zip   3.11MB   1177 downloads

mach_kernel 12.2.0 (OS X 10.8.2)
Attached File  mach_kernel_Atom 12.2.0.zip   3.11MB   2450 downloads

mach_kernel 12.3.0 (OS X 10.8.3)
Attached File  mach_kernel_Atom 12.3.0.zip   3.09MB   1287 downloads

#2
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
You guys should pin this one. Either here, or in the netbook sub forum.

#3
MARKBOARD NETSET

MARKBOARD NETSET

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 33 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Luck for Hack
on samsung n102 it boots until pci configuration ? tried -x & -f nothing

any help

#4
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
Add npci=0x2000 to your boot flags!

#5
stefano.85

stefano.85

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 232 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy
@theconnactic

Same here on asrock atom ion 330 pro it gets stuck at pci configuration begins even if i set "npci=2000".... i've also tried other ways to get past that screen but without success (with snow 10.6.8 it works perfectly)...

#6
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
Did you try npci=0x3000 also? It works sometimes.

Please report back anyway! Is important for us to know if the solution worked or not. :)

#7
stefano.85

stefano.85

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 232 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Did you try npci=0x3000 also? It works sometimes.

Please report back anyway! Is important for us to know if the solution worked or not. :)


Ok, i've tried also npci=0x3000... nothing.... it always get stuck at this point:


Attached File  IMG_0232.JPG   496.41KB   222 downloads


If it helps i've attached my E/E on the usb installation pendrive for troubleshooting (chameleon version is the latest one available in the official thread as today)
Cheers


Attached File  Extra.zip   2.04MB   99 downloads

#8
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
Which method did you use to install Mountain Lion?

Did you try to boot without the dsdt.aml?

Maybe this solution works: http://netkas.org/?p=1053

#9
stefano.85

stefano.85

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 232 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Which method did you use to install Mountain Lion?

Did you try to boot without the dsdt.aml?

Maybe this solution works: http://netkas.org/?p=1053


Ok, i've tried with the patched iopcifamily.kext .... and it goes forward from the previous error, but now it stucks few lines down... (see screenshot)...

Attached Files



#10
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
You're stuck at DSMOS has arrived. That probably means graphics issues. Try GraphicsEnabler=Yes and report back here, please.

#11
stefano.85

stefano.85

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 232 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy
I've tried to ovverride DSDT GFX injection with graphicenabler=yes ... nothing... it stucks always at the same point... it seems that my htpc doesn't like ML :|
What makes me disappointed is the fact that in Snow it works without a glitch! ok... i know that there are so many variables... but...

#12
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
Did you try to remove the dsdt.aml altogether? Of course, keep a back up of it before trying this.

#13
NSCXP2005

NSCXP2005

    InsanelyMac Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 605 posts
  • Location:Manchester UK
Hi to all,

Which netbook would be the best to use with Mountain Lion?

Thanks

NSCXP2005

#14
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
That's easy, a MacBook Air 11'!

Just kidding: i would opt for an Asus 1201n, because of it's ability to get QE/CI enabled, since it has nVidia Ion graphics. Until now, we couldn't solve this issue for Intel GMA graphics in Mountain Lion. Anyway, it depends on your needs, expectations and budget.

#15
splonk

splonk

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 167 posts
Doesn't seem to work too well with the Dev release of 10.8.2. The kernel patches but the machine refuses to boot with it. Tried the patcher, tried patching manually by running the perl strings in Terminal but same result. Using the 10.8.1 Atom kernel with the update causes a KP.

#16
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
What KP exactly? Could you attach a screenshot, please? Thank you!

#17
meklort

meklort

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Developers
  • 136 posts
  • Gender:Male

Doesn't seem to work too well with the Dev release of 10.8.2.


I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel.

#18
theconnactic

theconnactic

    Stubborn AMD user

  • Local Moderators
  • 2,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
Anyway, even for vanilla hacks, this update seems a little tricky (see the other topic).

Sorry if the question (or the one who asks) sounds inept , but probably there will be changes between the dev. 10.8.2 and the final end-user 10.8.2 update, right?

#19
splonk

splonk

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 167 posts

I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel.


Ah. So this Atom patcher is a bit pointless, then? Pity. Would have been a neat solution without having to bug those that understand kernel development better to come up with an updated kernel for each point release.

#20
fantomas1

fantomas1

    InsanelyMacaholic

  • Supervisors
  • 2,995 posts
  • Gender:Male

Sorry if the question (or the one who asks) sounds inept , but probably there will be changes between the dev. 10.8.2 and the final end-user 10.8.2 update, right?



no doubt ! Apple can release many beta builds before the final public release, so many changes or not :) ! Some times, Apple modify many things, and some times, not so !



I'm surprised it even worked on the 12.1.0 kernel, the addresses that need to be patched usually change.... which is probably what happened with the 12.2.0 kernel.



in the 10.8.1 beta builds (12B13, 12B17, 12B19), the addresses don't changed.... but in this first 10.8.2, clearly yes !

in the 12B13, we had the same 12.0.0 kernel, he changed to 12.1.0 in the 12B17 and stay the same in the 12B19 !





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2014 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   PHP hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy