kdb424 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 I honestly have no idea how good these benchmarks are. Let me know! System info Operating system: Mac OS X 10.5.4 (Build 9E17) Model: MacBook Pro (Mid 2007) Processor: Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz Frequency: 2.20 GHz Total CPU number: 2 Physical CPU number: 1 Bus frequency: 800 MHz Memory size: 2.00 GB Memory type: 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM Compiled with: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465) Tests results Composite result: 3.36 iBench_fp test suite Householder transformation: 3.54 Gaussian blur: 3.33 Mandelbrot set generation: 3.29 Numerical integration: 3.29 JPEG compression: 3.32 LU decomposition: 3.43 Edge detection: 3.85 Fast Fourier Transform: 3.34 Eigenvalue: 3.35 Partial result: 3.41 iBench_int test suite Prime numbers calculation: 3.37 Blowfish cypher: 3.35 Kruskal tree search: 3.39 ZIP compression: 3.55 Integer factorization: 3.23 N Queens problem: 3.44 Maximum Common Divisor: 3.36 Quick sorting: 3.23 Binary searching: 3.08 Bubble sorting: 3.12 MD5 hashing: 3.32 Partial result: 3.31 System info Operating system: Mac OS X 10.5.5 (Build 9F9) Model: MacBook Pro (Mid 2007) Processor: Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz Frequency: 2.20 GHz Total CPU number: 2 Physical CPU number: 1 Bus frequency: 800 MHz Memory size: 2.00 GB Memory type: 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM Compiled with: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465) Tests results Composite result: 3.10 iBench_fp test suite Householder transformation: 3.07 Gaussian blur: 3.01 Mandelbrot set generation: 3.22 Numerical integration: 3.06 JPEG compression: 3.15 LU decomposition: 2.86 Edge detection: 3.66 Fast Fourier Transform: 3.05 Eigenvalue: 3.00 Partial result: 3.11 iBench_int test suite Prime numbers calculation: 3.13 Blowfish cypher: 3.12 Kruskal tree search: 2.80 ZIP compression: 3.13 Integer factorization: 3.01 N Queens problem: 3.21 Maximum Common Divisor: 3.15 Quick sorting: 3.06 Binary searching: 3.03 Bubble sorting: 3.13 MD5 hashing: 3.13 Partial result: 3.08 You tell me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
age_sabres18 Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 i got 176 w/o HD in 10.5.4 -----> up to 186 w/o HD in 10.5.5 9f32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funky frank Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 Maybe some background indexes were running after installing 10.5.5 like spotlight indexing? Can you re-run again the 10.5.5 benchmark again please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nano2nd Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Xbench is running round about the same for me but graphics performance is massively improved: Previous score was around 25,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperboy Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 I don't think so. You can see there is little difference on Geekbench. http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=127274 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts