jlfilms Posted May 4, 2013 Share Posted May 4, 2013 i noticed that fcp was faster than pr pro cs6, i thought premiere would be faster because of the mercury playback cuda engine. jus curious if thats normal i added 2 clips 35 sec in length and fcp was much quicker at rendering it;. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Dev Posted May 4, 2013 Share Posted May 4, 2013 Depends on what type of render. Also are you using CUDA to render in CS6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlfilms Posted May 4, 2013 Author Share Posted May 4, 2013 yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3L4UGH1NGM4N Posted May 4, 2013 Share Posted May 4, 2013 I personally use FCP X for the ease of use on certain things but PP cs6 if I know I'm going between photoshop back and forth. PP CS6 seems to take ages longer than FCP X to churn out the same project from my personal experience though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts