Jump to content
6 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Trying to choose between Q9300 and Q9450. Q9300 is cheaper and still easy to overclock to Q9450 speed. I heard Q9300 have problems with OSX86. Is that still true ?

 

Any particular issue with these 45nm CPU ?

 

No particular issues with 45 nm CPUs.

 

In fact, they're in most cases a significant improvement, although any processor with less than a 1067 MHz FSB doesn't over-clock well, if at all.

 

Reasonable over-clocked speeds are (1333 / 1067 ) * processor speed rating for 1067 MHz FSB processors.

 

Reasonable over-clocked speeds are (1600 / 1333 ) * processor speed rating for 1333 MHz FSB processors.

Thanks for your answers!

 

Kinda heading towards Q9300 for it's interesting price.. altought its hard to find in Canada.

 

Using Q9300 w/o problem under 10.5 and 10.6.

Speedstep is running well, even with overclocking (3Ghz with FSB @ 400Mhz).

Good choice !

 

Any special kext for the CPU ? Vanilla kernel ?

 

thx

Using Q9300 w/o problem under 10.5 and 10.6.

Speedstep is running well, even with overclocking (3Ghz with FSB @ 400Mhz).

Good choice !

 

Thanks !

What RAM do you use ? I have DDR2-1066 . Can i use that later on, or do i need other ram to (beside Q9300).

I run FSB 333 OCed from 266 MHZ , RAM no OCed with Oldi E7400 C2D.

×
×
  • Create New...