Jump to content

45 nm processors : Q9300 & Q9450


6 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Trying to choose between Q9300 and Q9450. Q9300 is cheaper and still easy to overclock to Q9450 speed. I heard Q9300 have problems with OSX86. Is that still true ?

 

Any particular issue with these 45nm CPU ?

 

No particular issues with 45 nm CPUs.

 

In fact, they're in most cases a significant improvement, although any processor with less than a 1067 MHz FSB doesn't over-clock well, if at all.

 

Reasonable over-clocked speeds are (1333 / 1067 ) * processor speed rating for 1067 MHz FSB processors.

 

Reasonable over-clocked speeds are (1600 / 1333 ) * processor speed rating for 1333 MHz FSB processors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your answers!

 

Kinda heading towards Q9300 for it's interesting price.. altought its hard to find in Canada.

 

Using Q9300 w/o problem under 10.5 and 10.6.

Speedstep is running well, even with overclocking (3Ghz with FSB @ 400Mhz).

Good choice !

 

Any special kext for the CPU ? Vanilla kernel ?

 

thx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using Q9300 w/o problem under 10.5 and 10.6.

Speedstep is running well, even with overclocking (3Ghz with FSB @ 400Mhz).

Good choice !

 

Thanks !

What RAM do you use ? I have DDR2-1066 . Can i use that later on, or do i need other ram to (beside Q9300).

I run FSB 333 OCed from 266 MHZ , RAM no OCed with Oldi E7400 C2D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...