XLR Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 Last login: Sat Oct 9 16:16:26 on console /Extra/Util/bdmesg ; exit; Users-Mac-Pro:~ user$ /Extra/Util/bdmesg ; exit; msr(204): platform_info 00011701 msr(207): flex_ratio 00000000 CPU: Vendor/Model/ExtModel: 0x756e6547/0x1a/0x1 CPU: Family/ExtFamily: 0x6/0x0 CPU: MaxCoef/CurrCoef: 0x0/0x17 CPU: MaxDiv/CurrDiv: 0x0/0x0 CPU: TSCFreq: 3103MHz CPU: FSBFreq: 134MHz CPU: CPUFreq: 3103MHz CPU: NoCores/NoThreads: 8/16 CPU: Features: 0x000002ff Attempting to read GPT Read GPT Reading GPT partition 1, type C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B Reading GPT partition 2, type 48465300-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/com.apple.Boot.plist] 658 bytes. Scanning device 80...Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/com.apple.Boot.plist] 658 bytes. Setting boot-uuid to: A2A4D6E2-325F-3DC5-A6E3-0FC896FD729B Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/System/Library/CoreServices/SystemVersion.plist] 479 bytes. Loading Darwin 10.6 Loading kernel mach_kernel Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/mach_kernel] 4096 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/mach_kernel] 7442126 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/Extensions/fakesmc.kext/Contents/Info.plist] 2334 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/Extensions/JMicronATA.kext/Contents/Info.plist] 2041 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/Extensions/LegacyHDA.kext/Contents/Info.plist] 70052 bytes. LoadDrivers: Loading from [/system/Library/Caches/com.apple.kext.caches/Startup/Extensions.mkext] Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/System/Library/Caches/com.apple.kext.caches/Startup/Extensions.mkext] 4096 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/System/Library/Caches/com.apple.kext.caches/Startup/Extensions.mkext] 4860121 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/Extensions/fakesmc.kext/Contents/MacOS/fakesmc] 4096 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/Extensions/fakesmc.kext/Contents/MacOS/fakesmc] 52900 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/Extensions/JMicronATA.kext/Contents/MacOS/JMicronATA] 4096 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/Extensions/JMicronATA.kext/Contents/MacOS/JMicronATA] 75540 bytes. Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/DSDT.aml] 21076 bytes. Using PCI-Root-UID value: 0 nVidia GeForce 9500 GT 1024MB NV96 [10de:0640] :: PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x3,0x0)/Pci(0x0,0x0) LAN Controller [10ec:8168] :: PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x4)/Pci(0x0,0x0) Setting up lan keys Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/SMBIOS.plist] 391 bytes. Slot: 0 Type 24 2048MB (DDR3 SDRAM) 1333MHz Vendor=Corsair PartNo=CMP6GX3M3A1600C7 SerialNo=00000000 Slot: 2 Type 24 2048MB (DDR3 SDRAM) 1333MHz Vendor=Corsair PartNo=CMP6GX3M3A1600C7 SerialNo=00000000 Slot: 4 Type 24 2048MB (DDR3 SDRAM) 1333MHz Vendor=Corsair PartNo=CMP6GX3M3A1600C7 SerialNo=00000000 Patched DMI Table Found SMBIOS System Information Table 1 Customizing SystemID with : 00000000-0000-0000-0000-6cf049e4dc2b Read HFS+ file: [hd(0,2)/Extra/DSDT.aml] 21076 bytes. ACPI table not found: SSDT.aml FADT: Restart Fix applied! FADT: Using custom DSDT! Found ACPI CPU: CPU0 Found ACPI CPU: CPU1 Found ACPI CPU: CPU2 Found ACPI CPU: CPU3 Found ACPI CPU: CPU4 Found ACPI CPU: CPU5 Found ACPI CPU: CPU6 Found ACPI CPU: CPU7 Found ACPI CPU: CPU8 Found ACPI CPU: CPU9 Found ACPI CPU: CPUA Found ACPI CPU: CPUB Found ACPI CPU: CPUC Found ACPI CPU: CPUD Found ACPI CPU: CPUE Found ACPI CPU: CPUF SSDT with CPU C-States generated successfully RSDT: Added 1 SSDT table(s) Starting Darwin x86 logout [Process completed] GA-X58A-UD3R rev 1.0 BIOS F5, i7 950, Corsair Dominator 6GB. 10.6.2 retail installed via Kakewalk 2.2 and upgraded to the latest Chameleon 2 RC5. Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
XLR Posted October 9, 2010 Author Share Posted October 9, 2010 Installing Win7 updates, going to run Everest and dump DSDT tables. In Win it's slightly better, but still much much lower than normal: Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/#findComment-1561700 Share on other sites More sharing options...
XLR Posted October 9, 2010 Author Share Posted October 9, 2010 Alright, when i enable EIST function in BIOS the Geekbench scores are normal but the board starts making ringing noises as described on Gigabyte forums right here. With EIST disabled and native power management enabled i get very low Geekbench scores as in the first pic, and with EIST disabled and NullCPU installed i get a score of i7 920 instead of 950. EIST enabled with native power management: EIST enabled with NullCPUPowermanagement: Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/#findComment-1561719 Share on other sites More sharing options...
XLR Posted October 9, 2010 Author Share Posted October 9, 2010 When EIST enabled the noise is unbearable, i think i'm going to stay with NullCPU... Any ideas? Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/#findComment-1561770 Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnapalm Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 Did you read this at the bottom of the OP? ============ADDED by Admin:============ We have solution for this issue, which is described here runn3R Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/#findComment-1561806 Share on other sites More sharing options...
XLR Posted October 9, 2010 Author Share Posted October 9, 2010 Yes i did. But the thing is, that it doesn't occurs in windows... Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/#findComment-1561900 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hangten Posted October 10, 2010 Share Posted October 10, 2010 @XLR Bummer about whining. I noticed the same with geekbench so I disabled all throttled or speedsteping, Turbo and stuck in the NullCPU... powermanagment in E/E and WHAM geek was hitting 12200+ @ 3.8GHz i920 although my ram is not the fastest @16000mhz with T2 should be a lot better with much faster timing's on the ram but hey 2 years old. RAM was a ripoff back then. Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/#findComment-1561974 Share on other sites More sharing options...
draymis Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Do you know if this happens with ver2 of the GA-X58A-UD3R? Quote Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/234050-ridiculously-low-geekbench-scores-on-i7-950/#findComment-1577109 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.