paco19 Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 Hi. I am new in osx86 project and i have one question. What a diference about tiger-oxs86.img and Marklar-Tiger.dmg? Thanks. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
p4m Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 Markar-Tiger.dmg (about 2.8Gb) is the image of the Developer Transition Kit Install DVD released by Apple (unpatched, of course) The others I don't know cause I've donwloaded only Marklar Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13063 Share on other sites More sharing options...
paco19 Posted September 6, 2005 Author Share Posted September 6, 2005 There is "tiger-x86.tar.bz2" on the web. Read this link: http://www.360hacker.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=158 Explain how to install this "osx86" Which is better? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13066 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb_ Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 'Marklar Tiger' is the image of the Developer DVD and requires patching before you can install it. 'tiger-x86-flat.img', also known as 'deadmoo', also known as 'tiger-x86.tar.bz2' is a 6gb image of OSX already installed. You can use 'dd' to put it onto your hard disk, then you can use the 'Maxxuss' patch (search these forums) to get it to run everything stably. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13070 Share on other sites More sharing options...
paco19 Posted September 6, 2005 Author Share Posted September 6, 2005 So, are identical? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13074 Share on other sites More sharing options...
blahsucks Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 Reread that post. They are completely different. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13147 Share on other sites More sharing options...
speech Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 'Marklar Tiger' is the image of the Developer DVD and requires patching before you can install it. 'tiger-x86-flat.img', also known as 'deadmoo', also known as 'tiger-x86.tar.bz2' is a 6gb image of OSX already installed. You can use 'dd' to put it onto your hard disk, then you can use the 'Maxxuss' patch (search these forums) to get it to run everything stably. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No. "Marklar Tiger" is a copy of the Developer DVD (the x86 version of mac os X) like a copy of a music CD. "tiger-x86-flat.img" is a copy of the hard disk (like a snapshot). You can't do a clean install with it. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13150 Share on other sites More sharing options...
blahsucks Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 That's what he said. An image is the same thing as a copy (well, it's usually not written to disk yet, but still.) in case you don't know that. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13154 Share on other sites More sharing options...
paco19 Posted September 6, 2005 Author Share Posted September 6, 2005 ok, i know that marklar is a copy of dvd and tiger-s86-flat is a disk image, but when they are installing (with yours correspondient patch), are identical? I installed "tiger-x86-flat.img" with maxxuss. I would be install this or marklar? Which is better, or stable, or more speed. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13157 Share on other sites More sharing options...
speech Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 That's what he said. An image is the same thing as a copy (well, it's usually not written to disk yet, but still.) in case you don't know that. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ooops, sorry, I didn't quote the right post.... I wanted to answer to paco and his "So, are identical?". Anyway, I think "Marklar Tiger" is the best, because it's untouched and clean, and surely easier to install. But it doesn't work on my computer One day I'll try the deadmoo. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13229 Share on other sites More sharing options...
paco19 Posted September 6, 2005 Author Share Posted September 6, 2005 OK, sorry that it doesn´t work on your computer, I will try install Marklar on my computer. For Marklar I need "Markar-Tiger.dmg", "Generic OSx86 Install DVD Patcher v.3" and Darwin ¿ok?, I don´t need anything? Thanks to all for to answer to my questions. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13307 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kholinar Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 ok, i know that marklar is a copy of dvd and tiger-s86-flat is a disk image, but when they are installing (with yours correspondient patch), are identical? I installed "tiger-x86-flat.img" with maxxuss. I would be install this or marklar? Which is better, or stable, or more speed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The Tiger-Flat Image doesn't install. The developer dvd goes thru an installation, detecting things and such. The Image, on the other hand, is just copied there as if you'd installed it without going thru the install process, but not customized to your hardware like the DVD native install. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/2019-diference-about-tiger-oxs86img-and-marklar-tiger/#findComment-13313 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts