Apple X Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Ola a todos antes de nada! A ver por donde empiezo... dado mi asombro sobre el poco rendimiento de mi notebook con Leopard, y ya planteandome comprarme otro, me he dirigido a una Apple Store ubicada en Bilbao, y me podido realizar unos test de rendimiento, antes de decidirme a que MacBook Pro comprarme... y sorprendido me he quedado... Me han permitido poner a prueba en cuanto a rendimiento a 2 modelos, el MacBook Pro anterior al actual, del 2007 de 17 pulgadas, que integra un Core 2 Duo 2.40, y una grafica de 256 Mb, y los resultados ablan por si solos... MACBOOK PRO (2007) Results 55.89 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.2 (9C31) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model MacBookPro3,1 Drive Type FUJITSU MHW2160BHPL CPU Test 49.51 GCD Loop 91.63 4.83 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 43.55 1.03 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 37.09 1.22 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 50.09 8.72 Mops/sec Thread Test 75.00 Computation 70.16 1.42 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 80.56 3.47 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 69.81 System 67.07 Allocate 88.54 325.14 Kalloc/sec Fill 55.58 2702.55 MB/sec Copy 64.74 1337.18 MB/sec Stream 72.79 Copy 66.48 1373.04 MB/sec Scale 67.09 1386.00 MB/sec Add 82.59 1759.34 MB/sec Triad 77.54 1658.77 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 63.93 Line 58.87 3.92 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 74.13 22.13 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 60.70 4.95 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 63.79 1.61 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 64.15 4.01 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 55.42 Spinning Squares 55.42 70.30 frames/sec User Interface Test 67.24 Elements 67.24 308.61 refresh/sec Disk Test 34.68 Sequential 47.56 Uncached Write 70.60 43.35 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 73.63 41.66 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 22.75 6.66 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 80.63 40.53 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 27.29 Uncached Write 10.44 1.11 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 43.30 13.86 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 59.64 0.42 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 91.06 16.90 MB/sec [256K blocks] Casualmente los resultados son identicos al test realizado en mi ordenador, 2.20 Ghzs, Hackintosh, es mas, incluso me a dado mayor score... Los dos testeados con Xbench 1.3 descargado de su web oficial, y misma version de Leopard Results 62.77 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.2 (9C7010) Physical RAM 3072 MB Model EasyNote SB85 Drive Type ST9200420AS CPU Test 49.24 GCD Loop 92.82 4.89 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 44.70 1.06 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 36.98 1.22 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 47.50 8.27 Mops/sec Thread Test 74.67 Computation 67.96 1.38 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 82.85 3.56 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 70.96 System 70.01 Allocate 99.98 367.16 Kalloc/sec Fill 57.23 2782.67 MB/sec Copy 65.04 1343.42 MB/sec Stream 71.93 Copy 65.74 1357.89 MB/sec Scale 67.00 1384.20 MB/sec Add 78.84 1679.43 MB/sec Triad 78.20 1672.88 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 67.97 Line 58.33 3.88 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 64.88 19.37 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 53.52 4.36 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 61.54 1.55 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 164.74 10.31 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 52.98 Spinning Squares 52.98 67.20 frames/sec User Interface Test 63.65 Elements 63.65 292.11 refresh/sec Disk Test 41.18 Sequential 77.47 Uncached Write 61.94 38.03 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 79.92 45.22 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 74.19 21.71 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 105.30 52.92 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 28.04 Uncached Write 8.89 0.94 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 87.82 28.11 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 88.88 0.63 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 132.73 24.63 MB/sec [256K blocks] Quien podra desvelar el misterio del Xbench???? Un saludo de Dani Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schweppes Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 YO CAMBIARIA EL TITULO: deberia ser: EL MISTERIO DEL RENDIMIENTO DE XBENCH SE "PROFUNDIZA" Es muy raro, ya que yo pase xBench en una MacBook Pro de 15 con 2 gigas de ram hace unos pocos dias (el modelo 2008) y el resultado fue de mas de 100, no me acuerdo ahora cuanto exactamente... Una pregunta que se me ocurrio: El test lo realizaste con las notebooks conectadas a la corriente o funcionando en modo bateria ??? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739525 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple X Posted May 8, 2008 Author Share Posted May 8, 2008 Lo realive con los dos conectados a corriente (la bateria no estaba conectada, estaria guardada en la caja). A que es intrigante? Puede ser que Leopard de Scores no validos o que no asocie bien el rendimiento en este nuevo Sistema? Voy a instalar Tiger Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739527 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macoff Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Joe, sorprendente la noticia. Núnca habría pensado que fuera asi... AppleX prueba con Geekbench: http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/ y comparamos... MacOff Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739567 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derty Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 aqui dejo mis datos de macbook 2,16 ghz con gm950 y un disco duro flojito de rendiminento bastante viejo y no puede ser lo que dices....algo va mal en esas maquinas. Results 110.40 sin HD 146.23 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.2 (9C7010) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model MacBook2,1 Drive Type TOSHIBA MK2035GSS CPU Test 124.11 GCD Loop 254.47 13.41 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 122.62 2.91 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 78.30 2.58 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 135.61 23.61 Mops/sec Thread Test 179.58 Computation 167.56 3.39 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 193.46 8.32 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 137.37 System 162.36 Allocate 268.95 987.66 Kalloc/sec Fill 130.68 6354.07 MB/sec Copy 140.70 2906.16 MB/sec Stream 119.05 Copy 110.78 2288.18 MB/sec Scale 112.44 2323.03 MB/sec Add 127.61 2718.32 MB/sec Triad 127.51 2727.74 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 158.08 Line 150.00 9.99 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 182.87 54.60 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 150.34 12.25 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 156.65 3.95 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 154.84 9.69 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 309.59 Spinning Squares 309.59 392.73 frames/sec User Interface Test 244.41 Elements 244.41 1.12 Krefresh/sec Disk Test 34.66 Sequential 46.79 Uncached Write 67.52 41.45 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 51.31 29.03 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 26.32 7.70 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 75.74 38.07 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 27.52 Uncached Write 10.35 1.10 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 61.15 19.57 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 49.22 0.35 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 82.68 15.34 MB/sec [256K blocks] Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739570 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macoff Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Derty me parace monstruoso ese resultsdo en OpenGL para una Intel GMA950. WOW MacOff Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739585 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple X Posted May 8, 2008 Author Share Posted May 8, 2008 Ola chicos... He realizado el analisis con el geekbench, y da 1600 (el mio, da 1150) Me parece muy poca diferencia, he leido que deberia dar 3000 o por ahi.... Que opinais?? El macbook que e analizado con este resultado, a sido el nuevo, que esta en apple store, por valor de 2100, con procesador a 2.5 ghzs... me parece muy poco score para tanto portatil personalemente Aqui os dejo el fichero comprimido con el resultado Lo que no entiendo es como es posible que de mas score con un macbook normal ke kon un pro... la an cagado con el hardware o ke pasa??? Untitled2.zip Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739611 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macoff Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 AppleX estos son los mios. Pero date cuenta que es un desktop y tengo "problemillas" con la gráfica. P5B_Geekbench.geekbench.zip La verdad es que esto es raro de cojones... que es lo que está sucediendo. Al amigo Derty la gráfica integrada Intel GMA950 le da unos 300 puntos en OpenGL (xBench). MacOff Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739634 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derty Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 en el geekbench 32 me da...sigo con el macbook 2,16. score 2764 integer 2455 floating point 3871 memory score 1959 stream score 1586 mi hackintosh da: 3542 Platform: Mac OS X x86 (32-bit) Compiler: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465) Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5.2 (Build 9C7010) Model: Hackintosh Motherboard: ASUSTeK Computer INC. P5W DH Deluxe Rev 1.xx Processor: Intel® Core2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6 Logical Processors: 2 Physical Processors: 1 Processor Frequency: 2.67 GHz L1 Instruction Cache: 32.0 KB L1 Data Cache: 32.0 KB L2 Cache: 4.00 MB L3 Cache: 0.00 B Bus Frequency: 1.06 GHz Memory: 2.00 GB Memory Type: 667 MHz SDRAM SIMD: 1 BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. 0701 Processor Model: Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Integer (Score: 3076) Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 2215, 1.0, 97.3 MB/sec Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 4677, 2.0, 191.7 MB/sec Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 2102, 1.0, 6.72 MB/sec Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 3870, 1.9, 12.7 MB/sec Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1858, 1.0, 7.64 MB/sec Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 3649, 1.9, 14.5 MB/sec Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 1921, 1.0, 15.9 Mpixels/sec Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 3768, 2.0, 31.7 Mpixels/sec Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1574, 1.0, 26.4 Mpixels/sec Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 3098, 1.9, 50.5 Mpixels/sec Crafty Chess single-threaded scalar -- 2243, 1.0, 1.13 Mnodes/sec Crafty Chess multi-threaded scalar -- 3908, 1.7, 1.90 Mnodes/sec Lua single-threaded scalar -- 2824, 1.0, 1.09 Mnodes/sec Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 5363, 1.9, 2.06 Mnodes/sec Floating Point (Score: 4970) Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 1996, 1.0, 1.33 Gflops Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 4014, 2.0, 2.63 Gflops Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 3119, 1.0, 1.51 Gflops Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 6160, 1.9, 2.81 Gflops Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 2192, 1.7, 2.63 Gflops Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 4417, 3.0, 4.59 Gflops LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 788, 1.0, 701.8 Mflops LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 1591, 2.0, 1.40 Gflops Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 3783, 1.0, 565.0 Mflops Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 5586, 1.8, 1.04 Gflops Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 5366, 1.0, 12.5 Mpixels/sec Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 10409, 1.9, 24.0 Mpixels/sec Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 6931, 1.0, 5.48 Mpixels/sec Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 13238, 1.9, 10.4 Mpixels/sec Memory (Score: 2572) Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 3688, 1.0, 4.52 GB/sec Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 2614, 1.0, 1.79 GB/sec Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 2090, 1.0, 7.80 Mallocs/sec Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 2147, 1.0, 4.44 GB/sec Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 2323, 1.0, 2.40 GB/sec Stream (Score: 1946) Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 1961, 1.0, 2.68 GB/sec Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 2126, 1.0, 2.76 GB/sec Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 2013, 1.0, 2.61 GB/sec Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 2037, 1.1, 2.75 GB/sec Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 1786, 1.0, 2.70 GB/sec Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 2078, 1.1, 2.89 GB/sec Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 1981, 1.0, 2.74 GB/sec Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 1588, 1.1, 2.97 GB/sec Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739637 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macoff Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Derty que resultado tienes en tu hack con el xBench?. Estaria bien saberlo, para comparar... MacOff PD hora del cafe... ahora vuelvo. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739649 Share on other sites More sharing options...
titooo Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Yo de geekbench creo que no me fío mucho… Un asus F3JC, Core 2 Duo a 1.66Ghz, 2GB RAM a 667Mhz, Geforece Go 73000: En Windows XP: 1800 y pico En hackintosh (kalyway 10.5.2): 2100 y pico Y si, el hackintosh me va bien, pero no creo que me vaya mejor que el Windows original y recien instalado… no? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739660 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derty Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 da 172 con disco duro y 224 sin disco duro. asus P5W DH Deluxe x975 ich7 c2d 6700 2 gb 667 hd 750 wd y 320 wd asus Nvidia 7600 GS 256 ddr3 Results 224.28 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.2 (9C7010) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model MacPro3,1 Drive Type WDC WD3200KS-00PFB0 WDC WD3200KS-00PFB0 CPU Test 168.47 GCD Loop 315.88 16.65 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 152.74 3.63 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 123.67 4.08 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 168.22 29.29 Mops/sec Thread Test 223.64 Computation 195.18 3.95 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 261.81 11.26 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 170.97 System 200.69 Allocate 253.60 931.30 Kalloc/sec Fill 173.20 8421.37 MB/sec Copy 191.16 3948.24 MB/sec Stream 148.91 Copy 138.95 2869.92 MB/sec Scale 145.15 2998.74 MB/sec Add 155.70 3316.75 MB/sec Triad 157.41 3367.28 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 257.42 Line 196.29 13.07 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 267.16 79.76 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 217.54 17.73 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 209.67 5.29 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 820.14 51.30 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 218.58 Spinning Squares 218.58 277.29 frames/sec User Interface Test 416.81 Elements 416.81 1.91 Krefresh/sec Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739665 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac_cute Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 MACBOOK PRO (2007)Results 55.89 Algo está mal:esto es decepcionante:Results 55.89...Dejenme correr en la mia a ver... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739670 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macoff Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 da 172 con disco duro y 224 sin disco duro. asus DH deluxe 975 ich7 c2d 6700 2 gb 667 hd 750 wd y 320 wd Bueno gracias, pero me referia a todos los detalles. Si puede ser claro. MacOff Gracias Derty... Me cachis, a mi me está dando tan solo 82 puntos en OpenGL (problemas con los frameworks), con la X1950 Pro obtenia más de 400... joe como me arrepiento de haberla cambiado. (maldito Vista y su DX10) Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739671 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derty Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 me da mejor openGL el macbook con una intel 950 que la asus 7600????? estoy horrorizado. los frameworks, voy a revisar esto...... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739697 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macoff Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 me da mejor openGL el macbook con una intel 950 que la asus 7600????? estoy horrorizado. Jejeje que le has inyectado a esa GMA950 Dios mio!!! Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739701 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac_cute Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 aqui dejo mis datos de macbook 2,16 ghz con gm950 y un disco duro flojito de rendiminento bastante viejo y no puede ser lo que dices....algo va mal en esas maquinas.Results 110.40 sin HD 146.23 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.2 (9C7010) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model MacBook2,1 Drive Type TOSHIBA MK2035GSS CPU Test 124.11 GCD Loop 254.47 13.41 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 122.62 2.91 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 78.30 2.58 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 135.61 23.61 Mops/sec Thread Test 179.58 Computation 167.56 3.39 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 193.46 8.32 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 137.37 System 162.36 Allocate 268.95 987.66 Kalloc/sec Fill 130.68 6354.07 MB/sec Copy 140.70 2906.16 MB/sec Stream 119.05 Copy 110.78 2288.18 MB/sec Scale 112.44 2323.03 MB/sec Add 127.61 2718.32 MB/sec Triad 127.51 2727.74 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 158.08 Line 150.00 9.99 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 182.87 54.60 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 150.34 12.25 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 156.65 3.95 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 154.84 9.69 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 309.59 Spinning Squares 309.59 392.73 frames/sec User Interface Test 244.41 Elements 244.41 1.12 Krefresh/sec Disk Test 34.66 Sequential 46.79 Uncached Write 67.52 41.45 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 51.31 29.03 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 26.32 7.70 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 75.74 38.07 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 27.52 Uncached Write 10.35 1.10 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 61.15 19.57 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 49.22 0.35 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 82.68 15.34 MB/sec [256K blocks]Con HD que es lo que importa creo...Results 142.38 System Info Xbench Version 1.3System Version 10.5.2 (9C7010)Physical RAM 2048 MBModel MacBook2,1Drive Type FUJITSU MHW2580BHPLCPU Test 108.30 GCD Loop 251.59 13.05 Mops/secFloating Point Basic 124.59 2.91 Gflop/secvecLib FFT 75.25 2.48 Gflop/secFloating Point Library 79.98 13.93 Mops/secThread Test 217.03 Computation 198.62 3.99 Mops/sec, 4 threadsLock Contention 237.68 10.39 Mlocks/sec, 4 threadsMemory Test 122.67 System 123.92 Allocate 105.07 385.86 Kalloc/secFill 131.33 6385.66 MB/secCopy 141.31 2918.66 MB/secStream 121.44 Copy 112.45 2322.55 MB/secScale 118.09 2439.75 MB/secAdd 129.00 2747.89 MB/secTriad 127.80 2733.93 MB/secQuartz Graphics Test 109.52 Line 115.12 7.66 Klines/sec [50% alpha]Rectangle 126.73 37.84 Krects/sec [50% alpha]Circle 121.76 9.92 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]Bezier 124.90 3.15 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]Text 77.79 4.87 Kchars/secOpenGL Graphics Test 285.81 Spinning Squares 285.81 User Interface Test 294.39 Elements 294.39 1.34 Krefresh/secDisk Test 41.62 Sequential 64.19 Uncached Write 88.80 54.52 MB/sec [4K blocks]Uncached Write 79.89 43.56 MB/sec [256K blocks]Uncached Read 36.05 10.55 MB/sec [4K blocks]Uncached Read 88.57 44.06 MB/sec [256K blocks]Random 29.74 Uncached Write 11.87 1.13 MB/sec [4K blocks]Uncached Write 72.46 22.91 MB/sec [256K blocks]Uncached Read 63.18 0.44 MB/sec [4K blocks]Uncached Read 94.27 17.33 MB/sec [256K blocks]Y eso que es mi consentida porque la uso sólo para mis estudios AppleX:algo está mal...me da mejor openGL el macbook con una intel 950 que la asus 7600?????estoy horrorizado.los frameworks, voy a revisar esto......La receta para esto:una "super-string" (¿ya sabes que es verdad? ) Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739730 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac_cute Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Pues yo lo ignoro Que es una "super-string"? Como funciona? Como la obtengo? Saludos... La super string me refiero a las GFX-String para el video.Si lo que usas para tus gráficos en este momento no es lo mejor (NVinject o lo que sea),existe la posibilidad de una mejora.Por aquí algunos links http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?s=&...st&p=723763 Aquí puedes ver la mejora de los gráficos de chinasky (su caso) Otro link de acá: http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=102047 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-739748 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derty Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 si lo recuerdo..... >YO<........GFX-String Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-740018 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac_cute Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 si lo recuerdo.....>YO<........gfx-string> LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL... Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-740063 Share on other sites More sharing options...
-tool- Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Yo no sé pero el Xbench en un MBP sin HD daba 40 MBP penryn 2,4ghz Un problema con interface no se que. Luego sin Hd se ponia en 160-170 creo recordar al reinciar. He hecho un geekbench 32bits, y me dado esto: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/56665 No se que de bueno será para hackingtosh, pero se pone muy a la par de los Mac Pro Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-740201 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macgirl Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 XBench no es muy confiable. Incluso entre versiones del Mac OS pueden variar los número, yo recuerdo haber tenido números más altos en Tiger que en Leopard lo cual no es extraño ya que Leo requiere más rcursos, he incluso hay una version de Tiger la 10.4.3 que vuela, la más rápida que he visto. Pero a final de cuentas lo que importa es cómo sientes tu sistema, porque de nada sirve que XBech diga que tienes 400 cuando ves que el icono de la aplicacion que lanzas se queda botando minutos en el Dock o que incluso el Dock se mueve muy L--E--N--T--O Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-740278 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple X Posted May 9, 2008 Author Share Posted May 9, 2008 Ola chicos MacGirl, y como podemos medir el sistema? Yo me dirigido a esa Apple Store para probar los macBooks pro, y a parte de ese poco resultado, con un penryn 2.4 (de los nuevos que tiene la apple store de internet), incluso el dock de abajo se notaba que le costaba aparecer y ocultarse a la barra, pegaba saltos graficos a menudo (aunke se notaba que los widgets se abrian muxo mejor eso no se discute) Ademas, tambien e querido probarlos porque queria ver corriendo en la mac el bootcamp, para poder instalar juegos en la mac corriendo windows y directx como nativo, para jugar de vez en cuando con la 8600 GT y directX Como se explica, que en macs genuinos y altos de gama, el xbench de ese pedazo de score tan bajo??? Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/103852-el-misterio-del-rendimiento-de-xbench-se-desvela/#findComment-740357 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts