Jump to content

Fcp Vs Premiere pro cs6


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1
jlfilms

jlfilms

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali
  • Interests:Hackintoshs
i noticed that fcp was faster than pr pro cs6, i thought premiere would be faster because of the mercury playback cuda engine.

jus curious if thats normal

i added 2 clips 35 sec in length and fcp was much quicker at rendering it;.

#2
Rampage Dev

Rampage Dev

    InsanelyMac Deity

  • Local Moderators
  • 1,995 posts
  • Gender:Male
Depends on what type of render. Also are you using CUDA to render in CS6?

#3
jlfilms

jlfilms

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cali
  • Interests:Hackintoshs
yes

#4
TH3L4UGH1NGM4N

TH3L4UGH1NGM4N

    (~_~)

  • News Team
  • 1,156 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wonderland
  • Interests:(~_^)
I personally use FCP X for the ease of use on certain things but PP cs6 if I know I'm going between photoshop back and forth.

PP CS6 seems to take ages longer than FCP X to churn out the same project from my personal experience though.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2014 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   PHP hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy