nigroandres Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Buenas, es normal esto? Tengo un Disco IDE con Kaly 10.5.2 y otro Disco SATA con iDeneb 10.5.5 Ambos con vainilla y en 10.5.5 me da menos rendimiento en Xbench y GeekBench proce e7200 @ 3,4 Vga 8600 gts Mobo GA-P31 PD, Me habian recomendado instalar 10.5.5 para mejorar la parte grafica, pero la veo igual qeu en el 10.5.2, en ambas las noto lenta, instale en ambos NVKUSH Alguna Recomendacion!! EDIT: Screenshots y Logs Xbench en el post #3 Saludos y Gracias a todos En la noche subo screenshot de los benchmarks Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/137603-menor-rendimiento-en-1055-que-en-1052/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmcnano Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 tendrias que postear tu log del xbench por ejemplo, pero tendrias que postear de los 2 para comparar y ver donde es el problema. Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/137603-menor-rendimiento-en-1055-que-en-1052/#findComment-973985 Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigroandres Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 Actualizo con los benchmarks Kaly 10.5.2 Results 305.51 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.2 (9C7010) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model MacPro3,1 Drive Type SAMSUNG SP0822N SAMSUNG SP0822N CPU Test 242.60 GCD Loop 422.08 22.25 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 204.29 4.85 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 168.70 5.57 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 303.36 52.82 Mops/sec Thread Test 398.14 Computation 690.81 13.99 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 279.66 12.03 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 252.96 System 314.59 Allocate 458.18 1.68 Malloc/sec Fill 261.12 12696.25 MB/sec Copy 283.77 5861.24 MB/sec Stream 211.51 Copy 200.01 4131.17 MB/sec Scale 203.72 4208.77 MB/sec Add 222.02 4729.53 MB/sec Triad 222.28 4755.22 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 358.38 Line 279.24 18.59 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 384.31 114.74 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 308.66 25.16 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 296.52 7.48 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 865.06 54.11 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 225.70 Spinning Squares 225.70 286.31 frames/sec User Interface Test 546.00 Elements 546.00 2.51 Krefresh/sec Idebeb 10.5.5 Results 259.67 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.5 (9F33) Physical RAM 2048 MB Model MacPro3,1 Drive Type Hitachi HDP725025GLA380 Hitachi HDP725025GLA380 CPU Test 228.73 GCD Loop 398.95 21.03 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 192.81 4.58 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 158.85 5.24 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 285.73 49.76 Mops/sec Thread Test 462.48 Computation 588.78 11.93 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 380.79 16.38 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 238.38 System 305.97 Allocate 440.06 1.62 Malloc/sec Fill 246.64 11992.45 MB/sec Copy 287.51 5938.48 MB/sec Stream 195.25 Copy 186.06 3842.92 MB/sec Scale 183.63 3793.71 MB/sec Add 206.17 4391.94 MB/sec Triad 207.64 4441.94 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 315.63 Line 248.97 16.58 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 338.23 100.98 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 269.78 21.99 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 264.05 6.66 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 727.58 45.51 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 136.68 Spinning Squares 136.68 173.38 frames/sec User Interface Test 528.55 Elements 528.55 2.43 Krefresh/sec Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/137603-menor-rendimiento-en-1055-que-en-1052/#findComment-974036 Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmcnano Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Pues, probablemente sea una estupidez, pero la única diferencia que veo en tus tests es el disco duro, no debería de importar puesto que no lo estas testeando pero pues....si esta raro TODO en gral esta mas bajo en 10.5.5! mh..no se que decir XD saludos Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/137603-menor-rendimiento-en-1055-que-en-1052/#findComment-974474 Share on other sites More sharing options...
macoff Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Eso es por el maravilloso iDeneb, deberias de a ver dicho iDeneb 10.5.5 no 10.5.5... MacOff Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/137603-menor-rendimiento-en-1055-que-en-1052/#findComment-974480 Share on other sites More sharing options...
-tool- Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 MacOff, según tu, que tal estaría Retail vs Kalyway 10.5.2 hasta la 10.5.5 Link to comment https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/137603-menor-rendimiento-en-1055-que-en-1052/#findComment-974690 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts