And, well, since you started a few foreign-language versions of the wiki, then maybe that captcha thing I mentioned would do on the English-language site, at least. Junk accounts can be a pain for the SQL dump, you know.
36 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:10 AM
#22
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:52 PM
Seeing as it's working fairly well I'm going to leave it for the moment. I wouldn't bother blocking/protecting everything related to spammers either - if they're being blocked it's extra work for not much gain.
I'm not concerned about junk accounts, we have hundreds of thousands of them here which are occasionally pruned. If it becomes a problem I'll look into it.
I'm not concerned about junk accounts, we have hundreds of thousands of them here which are occasionally pruned. If it becomes a problem I'll look into it.
#23
Posted 26 June 2012 - 08:35 AM
iPoco, on 25 June 2012 - 02:52 PM, said:
Seeing as it's working fairly well I'm going to leave it for the moment. I wouldn't bother blocking/protecting everything related to spammers either - if they're being blocked it's extra work for not much gain.
I'm not concerned about junk accounts, we have hundreds of thousands of them here which are occasionally pruned. If it becomes a problem I'll look into it.
I'm not concerned about junk accounts, we have hundreds of thousands of them here which are occasionally pruned. If it becomes a problem I'll look into it.
OK, noted. BTW, how about this? http://www.mediawiki...on:Bad_Behavior
But if you ask me, letting the bad guys in can be a PITA on the bandwidth department (in extreme cases, that is). But since actual spam has been reduced upon installation of the plugins I guess that might have been a good compromise.
#24
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:32 PM
I've thought about that one, and also http://www.mediawiki...ion:AbuseFilter. Have you had any experience with either?
Thanks for the CheckSpambots advice
, really helping to weed out spammers. Had to disable the ACH blacklists though, they were causing the page edits to be really slow
Thanks for the CheckSpambots advice
#25
Posted 27 June 2012 - 02:01 AM
Yeah, AbuseFilter seems 'swell enough since it can weed things out based on certain conditions. Haven't tried it yet, though. As for the CheckSpambots filter, I only tried using the StopForumSpam API and not the other ones.
#26
Posted 27 June 2012 - 08:46 PM
I'll take a look and see, we might be spam free for once 
I thought that too until I looked in the check_spammers_plain.php file. Turns out they are enabled by default
. You might want to try disabling them yourself, it seems to be the cause of some pages loading really slow (http://huckjones.str...al:SpecialPages). I set the 4 ACH ones to 'no' to disable them and it sped some pages up considerably
.
I thought that too until I looked in the check_spammers_plain.php file. Turns out they are enabled by default
#27
Posted 28 June 2012 - 01:05 AM
At exactly what part were the ones you disabled in that PHP file?
I did see these lines on the file - are these the ACH stuff you mentioned?
I did see these lines on the file - are these the ACH stuff you mentioned?
$sNoCheckDroneACH = $_GET['dach']; // Drone.abuse.ch $sNoCheckSpamACH = $_GET['sach']; // spam.abuse.ch $sNoCheckHTTPBLACH = $_GET['hach']; // HTTPBL.abuse.ch $sNoCheckZeusACH = $_GET['zach']; // ZeusTracker.abuse.ch $sNoCheckBLDE = $_GET['blde']; // Blocklist.de
#28
Posted 28 June 2012 - 01:40 AM
Changed lines 70-73 of check_spammers_plain.php to:
$sNoCheckDroneACH = 'no';// $_GET['dach']; // Drone.abuse.ch $sNoCheckSpamACH = 'no';// $_GET['sach']; // spam.abuse.ch $sNoCheckHTTPBLACH = 'no';// $_GET['hach']; // HTTPBL.abuse.ch $sNoCheckZeusACH = 'no';// $_GET['zach']; // ZeusTracker.abuse.ch
#29
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:26 AM
Thanks man, that sped things up on my end now.
#30
Posted 30 June 2012 - 08:21 AM
Oh, and sorry for the double-post, but have you ever tried deleting the user SQL records on the wiki? I can use the Merge User extension on a wiki, but I'd like to get rid of undesired accounts en masse instead of doing it one-by-one.
#31
Posted 30 June 2012 - 06:13 PM
Not yet. You could always work on a copy of the DB to try first
#32
Posted 07 July 2012 - 03:35 AM
Ahh, OK. The User Merge extension seems fine for pruning junk accounts, though. I'd do that if we don't want to end up polluting the databases.
#33
Posted 15 August 2012 - 01:02 PM
Sorry for pestering you guys with posts, but the amount of junk on the wiki's still overwhelming for me to take care of easily.
#34
Posted 17 August 2012 - 03:13 PM
I've disabled creation of new pages for unregistered users. For some reason the accounts were being created, and then the user page was being edited anonymously. Not the best solution, but we rarely have new pages created by anonymous users anyways. I'll take a further look later, but this seems to have slowed things down for the moment
.
#35
Posted 20 August 2012 - 12:18 AM
Yeah, at least that's reassuring. BTW, do we already have an Akismet or SFS API key for snuffing out undesirables?
#36
Posted 22 August 2012 - 02:41 AM
No, PHP is doing pretty well along with Tornevall. We tested around 10 of them for a week and then went for the most effective ones
#37
Posted 22 August 2012 - 11:54 AM
I actually tried out Incapsula for snuffing rogue IPs out, since CAPTCHAs don't cut it anymore in my case. I also needed this as well here on the OSX86 wiki; after all, we're dealing with pages created en masse:
http://www.mediawiki...ion:DeleteBatch
Nuke's fine if a user makes a lot of pages, but we're dealing with multiple users spamming on a large scale.
http://www.mediawiki...ion:DeleteBatch
Nuke's fine if a user makes a lot of pages, but we're dealing with multiple users spamming on a large scale.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account








