Guest Ramm Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 I see that one Microsoft's website, and several other sources, that 1gb of RAM is required for Aero. That is not true in my case; I am running it under only 768mb. I don't know if this is already known, but.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollcage Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 I had it with only 512 mb. Of course it works better with 2 gb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ramm Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 What size video memory do you have? I have 256mb, but it may have to do with that. It runs fine for the most part on 768. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apowerr Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Im running aero currently with 2 GB Ram and a 256 MB Video card. Why would you want to run it on 768 MB RAM? RAM has gotten fairly cheap and if 768 MB is all you have a nice set of dual 1 GB sticks isnt that pricey. (Depending on what your mobo supports I guess DDR2 stuff can really jack up the price) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDoggyca Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 I got ario to run on only 256mb ram.... arop basicly relies on the video card... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddharth Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 I'm running it on 1 GB of 800 MHz DDR2 RAM & a 256 MB GDD3 VRAM Graphics card. You can force Aero to work as long as your GFX card supports Shader Model 2.0, irrespective of the RAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ramm Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Im running aero currently with 2 GB Ram and a 256 MB Video card. Why would you want to run it on 768 MB RAM? RAM has gotten fairly cheap and if 768 MB is all you have a nice set of dual 1 GB sticks isnt that pricey. (Depending on what your mobo supports I guess DDR2 stuff can really jack up the price) Heh, why don't you try affording 1gb of fully buffered PC800 ECC RDRAM? I could buy a whole new Mac for the price of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synaesthesia Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 RAMM, I think the 1gb is required in a pc to be labelled "Vista Premium Ready", but it doesn't mean you need it for aero graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabr Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Heh, why don't you try affording 1gb of fully buffered PC800 ECC RDRAM? I could buy a whole new Mac for the price of that. eBay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac-mini Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 i ran aero on my mini.... 512MB of ram and a GMA 950 it didnt default to aero but if you went to appearance control panel you can select aero and it runs fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patato Posted June 6, 2007 Share Posted June 6, 2007 On RC1/2 I ran Aero on my lappy(512mb, x1400/256mb), but it would switch into Vista's non Aero theme when it was running low on RAM(that happened a lot until I got a 2GB UFD for Readyboost) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ramm Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 So far it has been running very well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paranoid Marvin Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 It ran ok on my friend's 2400+ Sempron with 512mb of RAM and an AGP ATi X1650 Pro He does have quite an odd rig IMHO.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asap18 Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 Must be your Rambus RAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aae Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 raffle RDRAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ramm Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 Go away aae Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X_Naruto Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I see that one Microsoft's website, and several other sources, that 1gb of RAM is required for Aero. That is not true in my case; I am running it under only 768mb. I don't know if this is already known, but.... Those are just the "recommended" system requirements buddy. ^___~ Obviously you can run @ lower ram however @ the cost of some performance. Mininum requirements: 800 Mhz processor & 512mb system ram 20 GB Hard Drive with at least 15 GB of available space Support of super VGA graphics CD-Rom Drive Source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macmuslim Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Why spend a fortune on hardware to use that {censored}ed MS Vista when u can use OSX86 without any further upgrade. I was a Windows user, but when I installed MACOSX86 in my PC and fine-tuned it, I don't need that {censored}ed Vista OS anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric.C Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 aero works with 512 mb ram, i'm running vista on 2gb right now with an xp vm with 1.5 gb ram running at the saem time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
track09 Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 To run Vista WITH AERO, you need the following: 256 MB System RAM 800 MHz Processor 128 MB DirectX 9 compatible graphics card with WDDM support (Pixel Shader 2.0) Why would anyone think that you need 1 GB system RAM, thats only RECCOMENDED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuturDreamz Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Why spend a fortune on hardware to use that {censored}ed MS Vista when u can use OSX86 without any further upgrade. I was a Windows user, but when I installed MACOSX86 in my PC and fine-tuned it, I don't need that {censored}ed Vista OS anymore. It's fun talking in bold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
track09 Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 Why spend a fortune on hardware to use that {censored}ed MS Vista when u can use OSX86 without any further upgrade. I was a Windows user, but when I installed MACOSX86 in my PC and fine-tuned it, I don't need that {censored}ed Vista OS anymore. Vista requires less intense hardware than OSX86, less specific, etc. They're both good, but Vista runs fine, and is legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linuxfan66 Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 Vista requires less intense hardware than OSX86, less specific, etc. They're both good, but Vista runs fine, and is legal. exactly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firefoxussr Posted June 28, 2007 Share Posted June 28, 2007 Vista requires less intense hardware than OSX86, less specific, etc. They're both good, but Vista runs fine, and is legal. That's the first sensible thing I've heard in a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric.C Posted June 29, 2007 Share Posted June 29, 2007 uh... you'll need 512mb ram, thats the minimum for vista, unless ur running a modified version of it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts