clubbin Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Hi everyone, Maybe someone can point me in the right direction, I have a ATI All in Wonder 9800 Pro with 128 RAM however when I start up Tiger OSx86 it says 16MB I installed all the ". Kext" files and it shows AGP, which is great however I think getting even ½ of my 128MB’s of RAM would be fantastic. Am I the only one with is problem? Can I find information on how to fix this issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boozedog Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Hi there, thanks for your hard work on this! I've tried adding my Device ID and installing the kext but I get an error saying that the kext could not be loaded because it was installed incorrectly. weird ... Anyway, my Device ID is 0x5549 , it's a Radeon X800 Pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzlet Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 You have to add it in 2 places. In case you didn't. I've got a x800xl (0x554D) and it worked fine, so it should be fine for x800 pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealRemnant Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 EDIT: Nevermind. I'm an idiot who doesn't know how to read text on a screen. But in other news... I just have to get it to recognize my AGP bus but I can't seem to find the proper ID for my nForce 3 250GB chipset... More digging required. *sigh* Guess I'm going to make a Linux live boot CD after all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzlet Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 EDIT: Nevermind. I'm an idiot who doesn't know how to read text on a screen. But in other news... I just have to get it to recognize my AGP bus but I can't seem to find the proper ID for my nForce 3 250GB chipset... More digging required. *sigh* Guess I'm going to make a Linux live boot CD after all *Should* be 0x00E2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealRemnant Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Tried that. Just tried it again System Profiler STILL reports PCI Tried 00ED 00E2 00E4 Nothing. Any ideas? Soltek K8AN2E-GR I'm totally lost... and I'm not some stupid computer user. XP report 00E2 as well but X STILL refuses to recognize it and I'm totally lost and I don't want to spend a million hours downloading Ubuntu when I already have Knoppix which reports 00E2 as well... WTF?! EDIT: On the plus side, the GUI seems just a SLIGHT bit more responsive... may just be in my head though. Seriously though, any ideas? Because I'm totally lost. System profiler reports AGP no matter what device ID I choose... and yes, I've used chown and chmod... no good. I am still stuck seeing PCI.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMaxx32000 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Tried that. Just tried it again System Profiler STILL reports PCI Tried 00ED 00E2 00E4 Nothing. Any ideas? Soltek K8AN2E-GR I'm totally lost... and I'm not some stupid computer user. XP report 00E2 as well but X STILL refuses to recognize it and I'm totally lost and I don't want to spend a million hours downloading Ubuntu when I already have Knoppix which reports 00E2 as well... WTF?! EDIT: On the plus side, the GUI seems just a SLIGHT bit more responsive... may just be in my head though. Seriously though, any ideas? Because I'm totally lost. System profiler reports AGP no matter what device ID I choose... and yes, I've used chown and chmod... no good. I am still stuck seeing PCI.. 00E2 is the DeviceId, did you change the VendorId as well? This should be 10DE! So there has to be <string>pci10DE,00E2<string> instead of <string>pci8086,00E2<string> Hope this helps and you haven´t tried it yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pe3ucTop Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Hi to all.. Nice topic, nice Big work.. Small question to all especialy to JaS : This driver is usefull for any king of ATI cards or only for Radeon type? I'm interesting in driver for old one's Ati Mach or Rage .. Is chance to get it worked on thouse cards or don't waste time? And more one questien: Can this driver work as seccond display? (In situation when I work on another one with ATI connected as seccond) Sorry for my English.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tibormir Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Hi, sorry about my englesh its bead, can anyone hellp me with mine problem. I am not god in programinig display drivers, i post mine config file of graphic cartd is anyne have compiled drivers for this card. Anyway thanks for help.Ill be greatful if someone post compiled drivers for this card and litel help how to install them over the terminal. Thanks. Name ATI MOBILITY FireGL V3200 PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_3154&SUBSYS_05701014&REV_80\4&266C3FA7&0&0008 Adapter Type MOBILITY FireGL V3200 (0x3154), ATI Technologies Inc. compatible Adapter Description ATI MOBILITY FireGL V3200 Adapter RAM 128,00 MB (134.217.728 bytes) Installed Drivers ati2dvag.dll Driver Version 6.14.10.6497 INF File oem6.inf (ati2mtag_M24GL section) Color Planes 1 Color Table Entries 4294967296 Resolution 1600 x 1200 x 60 hertz Bits/Pixel 32 Memory Address 0xC0000000-0xC7FFFFFF I/O Port 0x00003000-0x00003FFF Memory Address 0xA8100000-0xA81FFFFF IRQ Channel IRQ 16 I/O Port 0x000003B0-0x000003BB I/O Port 0x000003C0-0x000003DF Memory Address 0xA0000-0xBFFFF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tibormir Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Please help i tried every driver you posted in the foru its not working for me pleas help Type: VGA-Compatible Controller Bus: PCI Vendor: ATI (0x1002) Device ID: 0x3154 Revision ID: 0x0080 Kernel Extension Info: No Kext Loaded Displays: Display: Resolution: 1600 x 1200 Depth: 32-bit Color Core Image: Not Supported Main Display: Yes Mirror: Off Online: Yes Quartz Extreme: Not Supported Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 tibormir: Sorry as everyone is that the drivers are not working for you, Please note the title: "This thread is for people what want to help develop the ATI Alpha driver" In other words, the driver is not finished by a long way, and no-one has a driver for you, it doesn't exist. If you can help develop one, the links to the source code are elsewhere in this thread. Best of Luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealRemnant Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Yes, I've done pci10DE,00E2... No luck. I'm just going to give up on it for now. I may, however, pick up programming, since I really want this driver... Even if it is outdated within a few months and no longer necessary, I think it would be a fun project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clubbin Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 Hey all JaS asked me to post this for anyone "including me" that did not know! the 16 mb is for the darwin boot loader.not os x.Os x uses the ati framebuffer And that is loaded after the darwin boot loader thats why it says 16 mbat boot.Please post this in the tread for others to read so they understand as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutty Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 hi... stumbled over some ati driver sourcecode, seems to be like its made for beos, but since the framebuffer addresses and other IO addresses are the same, i guess this might be of use for you guys... http://www.bebits.com/appver/2938 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boozedog Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 You have to add it in 2 places. In case you didn't. I've got a x800xl (0x554D) and it worked fine, so it should be fine for x800 pro. Thanks for the response, Fuzzlet! I assume you mean the two places in one file (info.plist)? If so, then yeah, I did that. I rebuilt and reinstalled, and now I'm not getting any error messages at boot, and Ati appears in the Extensions list in System Profiler. BUT I'm not able to change resolutions, etc ... shouldn't I be able to do that? Here's what I'm showing in System Profiler: Display: Type: VGA-Compatible Controller Bus: PCI Slot: PCI VRAM (Total): 256 MB Vendor: ATI (0x1002) Device ID: 0x5549 Revision ID: 0x0000 Displays: Display: Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Depth: 32-bit Color Core Image: Not Supported Main Display: Yes Mirror: Off Online: Yes Quartz Extreme: Not Supported Under Extensions: Ati: Version: 1.0.1d Last Modified: 10/28/05 10:21 AM Get Info String: Ati Location: /System/Library/Extensions/Ati.kext kext Version: 1.0.1 Load Address: 0xe7480000 Valid: Yes Authentic: Yes Dependencies: Satisfied Integrity: Unknown Also, I see these messages in the system log: Oct 28 10:27:27 localhost kernel[0]: display: family specific matching fails Oct 28 10:27:27 localhost kernel[0]: display: stalling for module Oct 28 10:27:35 powermac kernel[0]: ATI,Main: vram [c0000000:10000000] Oct 28 10:27:35 powermac kernel[0]: display: Not usable Oct 28 10:27:35 powermac kernel[0]: display: Not usable Oct 28 10:28:10 powermac crashdump[226]: kextcache crashed Oct 28 10:28:11 powermac crashdump[226]: crash report written to: /Library/Logs/CrashReporter/kextcache.crash.log Any thots? Should I start a separate topic for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koen2X Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 I rebuilt and reinstalled, and now I'm not getting any error messages at boot, and Ati appears in the Extensions list in System Profiler. BUT I'm not able to change resolutions, etc ... shouldn't I be able to do that? Sorry... the ATI kext does not enable you to change the resolution nor does it add any functionality. It is posted simply to provide programmers a base from which to start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutty Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 Sorry... the ATI kext does not enable you to change the resolution nor does it add any functionality. It is posted simply to provide programmers a base from which to start. i think it would be good to remove the kexts since they are not useful to people. the thread will get cluttered with useless posts like people asking why they cant change resolutions or refresh rates etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takuro Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 ............................................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealRemnant Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 Takuro - thank you for nailing it dead on. /RANT\ But at the same time, most won't learn from it. They'll {censored} about it and then see some magical kext to make their nForce work and do the same thing. Then they'll {censored} too. People will always {censored}. Its something that seems to be infused into us from the time we're children, at least in America. If something doesn't work the way it should, you {censored}, because you're allowed to. But let them {censored}. And honestly, those working on this driver, should just blow it off. Its just smoke coming out of the horse's ass. If you don't want the smoke, don't light the fire. Period. If people can't read, they should go back to middle school because I for damn sure know that it annoys me to no end when people won't read the information that they're given. To put it blunty... f*** 'em. Its their fault and they don't want to admit that so they blame it on someone else. If you can't play with the big boys, don't play at all because its not the big boys' fault that you fubared your OS X installation because you didn't read what was PROMINENTLY displayed from the beginning. Just my take on things. I get a little annoyed with the "YOUR kext ***HACK*** didn't work and I messed up my system because of YOU!" People should be happy that it even works at ALL... because it CERTAINLY wasn't meant to. /END RANT\ Carry on folks, carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtheG Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 Hi I just want to say just ignore it! I am one of those persons who does not know how to program but I follow this project with great interest (maybe I will learn something). I just keep my mouth (keyboard) shut and watch.. I would be very sad if the topic is moved to a place out of reache. Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xerid Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 Hi I just want to say just ignore it! I am one of those persons who does not know how to program but I follow this project with great interest (maybe I will learn something). I just keep my mouth (keyboard) shut and watch.. I would be very sad if the topic is moved to a place out of reache. Matt I do think that this topic should be broken out into two: developers only, and a kext support topic. If this doesn't happen, I support moving the development discussion from these boards (or make them private). The reason I say this is because the developers are spending more time answering the same questions. Maybe we should have just a handfull of testers that we pull our qa infor from. I'm not about closing/hiding, but rather speading things up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boozedog Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 I do think that this topic should be broken out into two: developers only, and a kext support topic. If this doesn't happen, I support moving the development discussion from these boards (or make them private). The reason I say this is because the developers are spending more time answering the same questions. Maybe we should have just a handfull of testers that we pull our qa infor from. I'm not about closing/hiding, but rather speading things up. I agree wholeheartedly -- it's too bad that I wasted both your time and mine. Programmers, go underground! Don't emerge 'til you have a driver that's useful! And good luck! :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xerid Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 I agree wholeheartedly -- it's too bad that I wasted both your time and mine. Programmers, go underground! Don't emerge 'til you have a driver that's useful! And good luck! :-) that's not what i mean! can you PM me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takuro Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 ............................................ (YAY 100TH POST. W00T) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefffromdc Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Why bother to provide support for something that is pre-alpha? If anything, that would sort of hint to people that this is a final product, and thus has its own sort of "tech support." In reality, this is intended for people who have the ability to troubleshoot for themselves and improve the existing resources we have available. And no, i disagree 100% on the proposal to go underground. it's better to keep things flowing freely out in the open. Splitting this into two seperate topics would be a mess also. Things should remain as they are, and people should use common sense as their best weapon against messing up their systems. Plain and simple. (YAY 100TH POST. W00T) i agree with you here, please don't split the topics or make the thread private. I can't do anything to help develop as I know very little about programming, but I love watching the development and learning what I can from this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts