Jump to content
InsanelyMac Forum
ameris cyning

NEWS FLASH: Apple switching away from Intel

Recommended Posts

Unless they have managed to secure a licence for x86 and add some VLIW support (think Project Denver or Transmeta) to reassure customers, this is bound to be a failure IMHO given how prevalent x86 is for the past 30 years. Apple has been the odd man out when they were still the only guys having a different architecture on their home computer systems in the 90s and 2000s.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/5/2018 at 8:18 AM, apianti said:

Yes, would become ARMmacOS, lol

No, it would become ARMacOS, because after all, it's OSx86 and not OSXx86.  (And yes I know it's pronounced like OS 10 and not OS ex, but that's not my point!)

On 4/8/2018 at 3:07 AM, Cyberdevs said:

But no worries it's going to be modular, so we can add as much as ARM processors as we like, they sky is the limit ;)


Unless Apple keeps their current policy in place (open up your computer, void your warranty).  That's probably the reason the 2013 Mac Pros are less rectangular and more like garbage cans cylindrical.  Because we all know that hacking and modding of Apple stuff never happens!  :whistle::whistle::whistle:

But in all seriousness, I can't see such a move working out.  If they no longer want to rely on Intel, why not switch to AMD (plus it would make our AMD development a heck of a lot easier)?  ARM, whether produced by Apple or outsourced, would create several limitations.  The x86 platform is still used in PC desktops and laptops for a reason.  I find it hard to believe that professional software like FCPX would render well and perform as well on ARM processors and not Intel.  Some might see this as a move to destroy hackintoshes as we know it, but it would also come at a cost for those who want to do the opposite: Use Boot Camp or VM software to install Windows on a Mac.  Sure, Microsoft is developing Windows 10 versions for ARM, equipped with x86 emulator support.  But if you have to run professional software like Premiere CC on an x86 emulator, for the time being, it would definitely take a hit in performance, and it would defeat the purpose of installing Windows on a Mac.

And if they want to streamline macOS with iOS by using the same processors, would that also come with the App Store limitations?  Even Windows, which has its own App Store, doesn't force you to only use apps unless you're using certain versions of Windows (Windows RT, Windows 10 S, etc.).  If you limit the Mac experience to the app store (because let's face it, all the App Store is ever used is to download macOS and other Apple software, and that's it), you downgrade the quality of the experience and make it less attractive.  If Apple made this move, I see it as a suicide mission for the Mac product line.  I definitely don't want to see in a few years posts like "RIP Macintosh (1984-2021)" because of a foolish move for Apple to maintain control over every aspect of computer design.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Regardless of the performance considerations for ARM processors for future Macs, it is not clear that Intel is loosing market share for chips production: we may find that Intel has been developing ARM chips production since 2016:










Edited by Loloflat6

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

First, those stories are two years old, and they just got the 10nm process for x64 with the latest generation. I feel like if anything significant was going on with it something else would have come about in two years. Plus I don't think you understand what that means, Intel is not making ARM chips, ARM is using Intel's custom foundry to make chips for ARM. They are competitors. It is like when Samsung made the ARM-based Apple chips at their foundries, they are direct competitors. The company that currently makes Apple's chips TMSC, is just an independent foundry, they make like every chip on the market, except from Intel, Samsung, STM, and TI, but they all out source processes to TMSC foundries as well. It seems more likely that this is maybe a move to push Apple to only deal with design and Intel, and have Intel worry about the actual manufacturing (also that is alluded to in the verge article which links to a five year old article saying that when they were in legal battles with Samsung, they switched to TMSC, is dealing with only Intel a better/cheaper/more efficient situation?).

Edited by apianti

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.