Jump to content
4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

In the article they mention iPhone 5 being an incremental upgrade to prior models and so not worth the price when compared to getting iPhone 4s for far cheaper, and that Samsung Galaxy is even cheaper still. I agree with both statements and that Samsung may be a better "value", but saw nothing to support the claim that Samsung's phone was a "better device" other than saying Android is an open platform, which some people like? If I was crazy rich with money to burn, then what reason to get Samsung? Apple's stuff has always been more expensive than it's competition, which is the only way they can compete :)

 

Good read though, as always!

  • Like 2

On the contrary my friend, unless you owed me $400.00 and hadn't paid up yet, how you spend you money doesn't matter to me, and I'd encourage you to buy it, so I could play with it too :)

  • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...