Gatchaman Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 Can somebody else confirm this. I've installed 10.6.3 using 2 different methods: one with Kakewalk 2.2 and the other with [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] + [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]. I ran Geekbench (32-bit) on both installs and got very different results: Kakewalk: 4805 [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] + [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]: 8324 My system is: GA-X58A-UD3R Core i7 930 (stock speed) Nvidia 9800GT 1GB Corsair 6GB RAM Has anybody else Geekbenched their system after these different install methods? Thank you for your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gatchaman Posted May 22, 2010 Author Share Posted May 22, 2010 Nobody has Geekbenched their system? It doesn't necessarily have to be the GA-X58A-UD3R mobo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gatchaman Posted May 23, 2010 Author Share Posted May 23, 2010 I guess everybody that uses Kakewalk is happy to run a crippled Hackintosh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pino72 Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Same for me, Kakewalk install is much to slow. Will use different method and compile my own DSDT etc. Geekbench gives me 5800 but my system should be around 8000+ (Q9550 @ 3,8GHz). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geiman Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Their both just automated methods of doing things you can do manually; depending on your hardware I'd say it could go either way. Set everything up specifically for your system by hand and I'd bet your scores would improve even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chhuong Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 I ran a geekbench 32bit test on my setup, installed using kakewalk, gigabyte ex58 ud5 6gb ram core i7-920 ati 4870 1gb my geekbench score was 4910 which i thought was way too low, i saw your posting and will be reinstalling using [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]+[url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] and will post my results. Also i've seen people post saying that 64bit software doesn't run using [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]+[url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url], any one else have a conflict with that?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ps2pk Posted September 24, 2010 Share Posted September 24, 2010 I ran a geekbench 32bit test on my setup,installed using kakewalk, gigabyte ex58 ud5 6gb ram core i7-920 ati 4870 1gb my geekbench score was 4910 which i thought was way too low, i saw your posting and will be reinstalling using [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]+[url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] and will post my results. Also i've seen people post saying that 64bit software doesn't run using [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]+[url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url], any one else have a conflict with that?? p6x58d [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] + [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] + other extra folder core i7 920 @ 3.8 6gb @ 1600 5850 640gb wd black hd 10253 - 32bit was expecting better but the system flies anyways! i tried with an SSD and OMG! Makes it that much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chhuong Posted September 25, 2010 Share Posted September 25, 2010 I ran a geekbench 32bit test on my setup,installed using kakewalk, gigabyte ex58 ud5 6gb ram core i7-920 ati 4870 1gb my geekbench score was 4910 which i thought was way too low, i saw your posting and will be reinstalling using [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]+[url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] and will post my results. Also i've seen people post saying that 64bit software doesn't run using [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]+[url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url], any one else have a conflict with that?? update!! so i reformatted and installed using [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url], and not kakewalk, i didn't use [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] yet, so my system wasn't 100% functional, but i ran the test again and my score was 8570 and that was with only 4gb ram. So gatchamans assumptions are right. Kakewalk is crippling the system some how. Glad someone figured this out, i would've hated having to reload everything. Hope this helps others! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donw35 Posted September 25, 2010 Share Posted September 25, 2010 interesting, wonder what the difference is. ? is it the DSDT.aml or some kext. in my sig is my machine, looks like I am going to do a re-install.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donw35 Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 I did some testing between nawcom, [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] and Kakewalk and I get roughly the same geekbench results. might be with the i5 and i7 cpu's my system OC to 3Ghz got 6550 on geekbench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chhuong Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Maybe it has something to do with the way it boots into the osx?? The [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] install was a vanilla install didn't install [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] yet, so go figure. Not sure what to make of it? but for now will stick with [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url] and [url="http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/279450-why-insanelymac-does-not-support-tonymacx86/"]#####[/url]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaLd0n Posted September 28, 2010 Share Posted September 28, 2010 Quad-Core Q6600(Old Warrior) 64 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/294364 32 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/294367 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donw35 Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Nice OC MaLd0n Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts