Jump to content
9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

This is PURE speculation, but I highly doubt 10.5 will run on our standard PC hardware. My reasons are as follows:

1. New kernel - There has been a good deal of discussion about dropping the mach_kernel which for the most part was open sourced through Darwin. This I believe helped a lot in the initial development of the base patches we all started from.

2. EFI - We currently bypass the EFI requirement by using patched kernel files, as discuess in the previous post dating back to 10.4.4. With the release of a new 10.5 kernel, mach or not we may no longer be able to bypass this requirement.

3. Virtualization - One of the possible inclusions in 10.5 will be virtualization technology. This will most likely be very closely tied to the VT technologies is the Pentium D line and up. Having that technology in the chip may be a fundamental part for allowing 10.5 to be installed, mainly in regards to the Intel technology as I dont see how they could implement this on PPC.

 

Just my thoughts, do not take as canon.

1. speculation on a new kernel that personally i don't see happening. the mach kernel will still be around i believe.

 

2. this is a good possibility, but one some people are working on.

 

3. worst case this might just mean everyone will have to go with the pentium D's with the VT technology. not that big of a deal as i see it.

bluedragon, while you are right in pointing out that apple won't drop support for its ppc lineup, remember that the version of OS X that is being hacked to run on generic PC's is not the PPC but the Intel version.

 

Apple could very well put a VT requirement in its intel lineup, and when the installation is checking to see if you have a powerpc or intel based mac, it could just as easily check to see if you have a VT capable processor.

Urig I think I need to correct you. According to this data sheet from Intel, both the Core Solo and Duo have the VT technology.

 

http://www.intel.com/design/mobile/datashts/309221.htm

 

If in fact that is the case, I could very well see Mac requiring the VT technology for install. In fact I think they might even go so far as running it as a HyperVisor environment. Both (or more!) OS's starting to at the same time and running concurently. This as opposed to the VMWare/Parrallels style of host and guest OS.

 

As for the they can't due it cause the have to support PPC argument, I believe that was addressed in an earlier post and I would have to agree. Apple could very easily have the VT check as part of the check to see whether or not to install the Intel or PPC version. Do not forget we are talking about a lot more then the kernel, most of the OS components had to be compiled for and will only run on x86 hardware. I am sure the hardware test will be very through to make sure the right components get installed for the right platform.

×
×
  • Create New...