Jump to content
InsanelyMac Forum
Sign in to follow this  

Gateway drug?

Recommended Posts

Could Apple be not doing anything about OSX86 to lure people into buying a Mac? I would assume most (if not all) of the people on this and other osx86 forums are potential Mac buyers, but they simply don't want to pay for one, possibly because the price is too high for them. With OSX86, they can at least get a taste of it, but Apple knows that it won't run very well and so predicts it will make them more likely to buy a Mac, so they can get the experience they tried firsthand but as it was meant to be. Discuss.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is a very real possibility, although I doubt that Apple would actively encourage the theft of their OS. I think that after they realized it was out, they might as well let people mess around with it instead of slapping them with lawsuits.


So I think it's more of a secondary - almost an afterthought - benfit for them.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course Apple wouldn't encourage stealing it, but there's no way they can really do anything now. Plus our hax aren't going to work on the retail versions, so stopping us wouldn't accomplish anything against a mass release.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the beginning of OSX Apple has been making versions that would run on Intel hardware (5 yrs +).

Just think about that for a few seconds............Long enough?


How long has sse, sse2, and sse3 been around????? hmmmm


What kind of drivers really exist? hmmmmm


Why did they bring out the mini???


It is about buying their hardware configuration.


The Developer version of OSX is a modified version that only loads the drivers etc that are in the dev box, why put in the other stuff when the idea is to help port existing programs to the new standard (being able to run in either version of the OS). Why let out the OS and all the drivers for all the versions of OSX that have been made when the idea is to get hardware into the hands of the paying public.


If the idea was to allow OSx86 into the world to convert PC owners to OSX users then they would have had everything they made up to now on the disk. If the idea was to make sure the "leaked" version was going to tease users to make them buy the OS, then they would have released a version that would run on the majority of hardware. i.e. not sse3 only, not sata, etc.


The fact that it is out of their hands and they knew it would happen, Apple protected themselves by not showing their complete hand.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Cool! Do you have a link? Googled and didn't see anything yet.   Never mind... you're quick! I just noticed you updated it on the 1st page THANKS!!!!!!
    • I resolved the problem. Just set this coding in your config.plist:   "
                      <string>USB 10.13.4+ by PMHeart</string>
              </array>     "
    • New Web Driver - 387. for 10.13.4 build 17E202
    • I guess having pre{max-height: 500px;overflow: auto;} in CSS was too much for IPS Devs' tast.  Until an admin has hands on this, you still can use stylish plugin to accomplish it.     In fact, it is pretty easy than it appears - Just apply a simple click on the codebox (it will highlight it), then 'delete' key.
    • all the possible frequencyes i have added seems to work fine at the moment, i have added a lot of different frequencyes to support better all kinds of professional applications, inclunding strange sampling rates and goes from 8khz up to 176.4 khz, unfortunately 192 khz does not seems to work even on cards which should support it like the audigy rx, but other frequencyes just works fine and at the moment i have tested only the sound blaster audigy rx and the audigy sb0090 (1st gen audigy) and i can confirm that all the frequencyes from 8khz up to 176.4 khz does work on that card, so i think that such frequencyes should work on all the audigy 2, 2sz, 4 cards as well, tomorrow i will test with my sound blaster live! cards and i will let you know, but here are also some photos (pro tip: use cmd + alt/opton + 4 and then press space to make a screenshot of a single window):