Jump to content

TSC sync XNU patch


Kassi
 Share

212 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

may ask you to create a newer patched kernel with 9.7?

or help me to create myself?

 

 

if you're interested in Vanilla kernel 9.7.0 with tsc sync patched, send me a private message.

 

$ uname -v

Darwin Kernel Version 9.7.0: Fri 15 May 2009 15:44:12 EDT; (15 min ago)

 

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: Copyright © 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: The Regents of the University of CaliforniaAll rights reserved.

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: MAC Framework successfully initialized

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: using 10485 buffer headers and 4096 cluster IO buffer headers

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: [TSC] original delta: -2945165457, new delta: 139. (CPU1)

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: IOAPIC: Version 0x20 Vectors 64:87

 

running perfectly on my core duo 1.6 ghz. (-tscsync)

 

pepere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you're interested in Vanilla kernel 9.7.0 with tsc sync patched, send me a private message.

 

$ uname -v

Darwin Kernel Version 9.7.0: Fri 15 May 2009 15:44:12 EDT; (15 min ago)

 

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: Copyright © 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: The Regents of the University of CaliforniaAll rights reserved.

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: MAC Framework successfully initialized

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: using 10485 buffer headers and 4096 cluster IO buffer headers

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: [TSC] original delta: -2945165457, new delta: 139. (CPU1)

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: IOAPIC: Version 0x20 Vectors 64:87

 

running perfectly on my core duo 1.6 ghz. (-tscsync)

 

pepere

 

PM sent...I'm very interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you're interested in Vanilla kernel 9.7.0 with tsc sync patched, send me a private message.

 

$ uname -v

Darwin Kernel Version 9.7.0: Fri 15 May 2009 15:44:12 EDT; (15 min ago)

 

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: Copyright © 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: The Regents of the University of CaliforniaAll rights reserved.

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: MAC Framework successfully initialized

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: using 10485 buffer headers and 4096 cluster IO buffer headers

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: [TSC] original delta: -2945165457, new delta: 139. (CPU1)

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: IOAPIC: Version 0x20 Vectors 64:87

 

running perfectly on my core duo 1.6 ghz. (-tscsync)

 

pepere

 

PM sent, please check :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you're interested in Vanilla kernel 9.7.0 with tsc sync patched, send me a private message.

 

$ uname -v

Darwin Kernel Version 9.7.0: Fri 15 May 2009 15:44:12 EDT; (15 min ago)

 

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: Copyright © 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: The Regents of the University of CaliforniaAll rights reserved.

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: MAC Framework successfully initialized

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: using 10485 buffer headers and 4096 cluster IO buffer headers

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: [TSC] original delta: -2945165457, new delta: 139. (CPU1)

May 15 15:46:14 localhost kernel[0]: IOAPIC: Version 0x20 Vectors 64:87

 

running perfectly on my core duo 1.6 ghz. (-tscsync)

 

pepere

Unfortunatly, the -tscsync command is useless.

And why do not share it here, instead of forcing people to send you Pm's...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly, the -tscsync command is useless.

And why do not share it here, instead of forcing people to send you Pm's...?

 

Cause my username is in the kernel rev ? and it's just for testing, i'm cleaning this {censored},

and I need to review something about PE_parse*

 

pepere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cause my username is in the kernel rev ? and it's just for testing, i'm cleaning this {censored},

and I need to review something about PE_parse*

 

pepere

 

 

Pepere,

 

Please check your PM. Been waiting to try your kernel. THanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kernel is on the first page. i'm making a diff now and will post it.

 

Thanks a lot, cosmo1t!

Works great.

 

The only thing I noticed – CPU-i shows that i have CPU0 only (one core instead of CPU0 and CPU1).

But sysinfo and all tests shows that CPU works fine, at full strength and both cores are active.

;)

 

Thanks again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
10.5.8 is out.

Just upgraded without a trouble.

 

Now �" will wait for the 9.8 kernel.

:)

 

Thanks for all your work, guys!

 

 

You didn't have trouble with Airport with 10.5.8 update? I restored 10.5.7 IO80211Family.kext to fix, but must boot every time with -f flag in order for Airport to work. That's the only bug I have with 10.5.8 (other than sleep) with my D620. Awaiting 10.5.8 kernel patch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't have trouble with Airport with 10.5.8 update? I restored 10.5.7 IO80211Family.kext to fix, but must boot every time with -f flag in order for Airport to work. That's the only bug I have with 10.5.8 (other than sleep) with my D620. Awaiting 10.5.8 kernel patch!

 

Didn't have those problems. All's fine (including sleep), except the kernel.

 

Moreover, I removed all GFX strings and right now using the "autodetect" feature of the new Cameleon RC2.

Yesterday has updated nVidia drivers from their website. Without 2-nd core it's hard to say about performance boost/degrade...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't have those problems. All's fine (including sleep), except the kernel.

 

Moreover, I removed all GFX strings and right now using the "autodetect" feature of the new Cameleon RC2.

Yesterday has updated nVidia drivers from their website. Without 2-nd core it's hard to say about performance boost/degrade...

 

Okay, Autodetect does not work with Intel, so there's one easy solution for you I can't use. Still looking for an Intel EFI string that works on this system.

 

I wonder what card you used to replace your intel wifi card? That may be the difference why your airport is still working right. I noticed some threads elsewhere that Apple is replacing incompatible (older) airport cards that are not functioning correctly with 10.5.8 update. I think I have the Original Dell B/G card in mine. Something newer might not have the problem. I may swap cards with my D630 A/G/N card and see what happens. A new kernel for 10.5.8 is going to be really nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...