JonTheSavage Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html It is sitting on 1,236,604 at the moment. Over one million Iraqies murdered since Bush's invasion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iSkylla Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 Except that's based on the flawed Lancet article which has been debunked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonTheSavage Posted July 13, 2008 Author Share Posted July 13, 2008 Except that's based on the flawed Lancet article which has been debunked. Got a link to support your conspiracy theory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iSkylla Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 I don't usually quote these people, but here is an article in the National Review: http://www.slate.com/id/2108887/ This will show you the estimates by various organizations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War#Casualty_estimates The only one that's really credible is this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Health_...casualty_survey The WHO was involved and it's the most credible. Don't get me wrong, that's way too many dead, but the one you're using is flawed and a gross overstatement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superhai Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 The worst part for both sides... they die for no a reason at all. When in 25 year the sons/daughters ask their mothers (or fathers) why dad/mom is dead, they will say "they died for a better world" -- knowing that it was nowhere near so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonTheSavage Posted July 17, 2008 Author Share Posted July 17, 2008 I don't usually quote these people, but here is an article in the National Review: http://www.slate.com/id/2108887/ This will show you the estimates by various organizations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War#Casualty_estimates The only one that's really credible is this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Health_...casualty_survey The WHO was involved and it's the most credible. Don't get me wrong, that's way too many dead, but the one you're using is flawed and a gross overstatement. Forgive me If I don't support an organization that turns up hundreds of thousands of protesters every year. Sometimes, in articles such as this, they give you a body count of "shot dead men" per se. They don't count women, children, NOR, do they count the thousands dying from radiation sickness from the depleted uranium lying all over their lands. Your wiki link, gives a body count from 2003. Its 5 years old. Registrant: Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive 1515 North Courthouse Road, 11th Floor Arlington, VA 22201 US Domain Name: SLATE.COM The Washington Post's editor, Leonard Downie., which is about to retire (and probably flee the US), is a member of the CFR, and another Rockefeller puppet. http://www.truedemocracy.net/td3/shadow/s03.html https://www.mega.nu/ampp/cfr.html http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1191.cfm http://www.liberalisten.com/www.radioberge...ergame/cfr.html http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:9RDXZ...;cd=7&gl=us "According to Bob Woodward's 2005 book The Secret Man, Downie was one of the few people to know the true identity of Watergate scandal informant Deep Throat before it was revealed to be Mark Felt." Debunked..... NEXT! The worst part for both sides... they die for no a reason at all. When in 25 year the sons/daughters ask their mothers (or fathers) why dad/mom is dead, they will say "they died for a better world" -- knowing that it was nowhere near so. That is true, especially when someone brings into question "Who's better world?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts