Jump to content

nmano

Donators
  • Content Count

    919
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    nmano got a reaction from hardcorehenry in OpenCore Discussion   
    Thats detail from
    https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=341489
  2. Like
    nmano got a reaction from hardcorehenry in OpenCore Discussion   
    Thats detail from
    https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=341489
  3. Like
    nmano got a reaction from hardcorehenry in OpenCore Discussion   
    Thats detail from
    https://www.insanelymac.com/forum/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=341489
  4. Like
    nmano reacted to hardcorehenry in OpenCore Discussion   
    How about you stick to original SSDT-PMC.aml like @HmO suggests, and additionally try to add "this detail" via config.plist>DeviceProperties?
  5. Like
    nmano reacted to Matgen84 in [Pre-Release] macOS Catalina 10.15.3   
    Update done on Z390 Aorus Master
     
     

  6. Like
    nmano reacted to HmO in OpenCore Discussion   
    Method STA & Name CRS must be outside Method DSM
     

  7. Like
    nmano reacted to Ellybz in OpenCore Discussion   
    I wasn't originally but I'm using it now. It regulates power on USB ports much better while using sleep/wake functions. Never tried recovery. I'm cloning my drives with CCC (in case of any issue).
  8. Like
    nmano got a reaction from Matgen84 in OpenCore Discussion   
    X299 sample SSDT
     
    ACPI patch
    Comment  -   change _DSM to XDSM  Support SSDT Direct patch For XHCI, LPC0, SAT1,
    Find          -   5F44534D
    Replace   -    5844534D
     
    X299-SSDT.zip
  9. Like
    nmano reacted to vit9696 in OpenCore Discussion   
    We were able to reproduce this. Filed as https://github.com/acidanthera/bugtracker/issues/669. Do not use this controller for now.
  10. Like
    nmano reacted to Tony Arnold in OpenCore Discussion   
    What does this do? Is this worth applying on an X299 board with an i9 7900X?
  11. Like
    nmano got a reaction from Matgen84 in OpenCore Discussion   
    I test with clover its worked open core not yet.
    CPU ->Type 0x0F01
    Cpu-type 010f

     
    I have 8 Memory Slots but I can see 4 Slots
    PlatformFeature  0x20
     

  12. Like
    nmano reacted to kylon in Cloud Clover Editor (CCE) [Clover, Ozmosis, Chameleon, OpenCore]   
    Cloud Clover Editor is an open source application that allows you to manage the configuration of various Hackintosh Bootloaders.

    Open Cloud Clover Editor
     
    Cloud Clover Editor Wiki
    Cloud Clover Editor Sources
     
     
    Features
    Supports Clover EFI, Ozmosis, Chameleon, OpenCore GUI and Text Editor Mode CCE Bank Mobile friendly and more...  
    Officially supported browsers
    Chrome 42+ Microsoft Edge 14+ Firefox 39+ Safari 10+ Opera 29+ Opera Mobile 12+ Chrome for Android 75+ Firefox for Android 67+  
     
    Credits
    mackie100 - took some ideas from his app Clover EFI dev team Eric Slivka - new serial number Virtual1 - new serial number cecekpawon - PHP 5.3.3 patch, , help with the ACPI Loader Mode flag and more Micky1979 - Clover flying editor  (Discontinued) crusher. - Help with the ACPI Loader Mode flag Download-Fritz - Help with the ACPI Loader Mode flag Pavo - Ozmosis fields and values stehor - Ozmosis fields and values Sherlocks - General help and support gujiangjiang - General help and support  
    Please let me know if i forgot you!
  13. Like
    nmano got a reaction from Matgen84 in OpenCore Discussion   
    I test with clover its worked open core not yet.
    CPU ->Type 0x0F01
    Cpu-type 010f

     
    I have 8 Memory Slots but I can see 4 Slots
    PlatformFeature  0x20
     

  14. Like
    nmano reacted to fabiosun in OpenCore Discussion   
    pictures you attached is a normal beahviour for your Haswell EP CPU (v3 xeon)
    you can use  kext or normal patching with the help of bootloader you want to use as suggested in previous message
    V4 xeon are Broadwell EP and can work well the same using proper Patches and fakecpuid or using automatic bootloader way to patch it
    Higher and modern cpu as 7980xe or 9980 xe are different and they could need only an unlocked CFG lock parameter in motherboard bios to work
    I think @nmano cpu problem with geekbench is a different problem, maybe with some failure in components of his rig
     
  15. Like
    nmano reacted to pitrysha in OpenCore Discussion   
    For your x299 processor, see the information here.
    https://pikeralpha.wordpress.com/2017/08/18/xeon-microcode-found-in-imac-pro-firmware/
    Cpuid1Data <-> E3060500 00000000 00000000 00000000
  16. Like
    nmano reacted to vit9696 in OpenCore Discussion   
    @fabiosun, from the logs it looks like boot failed at boot.efi stage. Most likely due to memory allocation failure. Unfortunately we do not know any resolution at the moment and we also have no plans to perform any investigation as AMD is not a priority for us for the time being.
  17. Like
    nmano reacted to pitrysha in OpenCore Discussion   
    If  do not enable the CPU Emulate or Patch _xcpm_bootstrap © Pike R. Alpha, the system will not boot. Сan enable PMDrvr.text instead. How right?
    Архив.zip
  18. Like
    nmano reacted to pitrysha in OpenCore Discussion   
    C3060300 for Haswell
    D4060300 for Broadwell
    Found on the Internet
  19. Like
    nmano reacted to vit9696 in OpenCore Discussion   
    @pitrysha, thanks for the test, this makes good sense to me.
     
    @nmano, you do not understand what Cpuid1Data and Cpuid1Mask are, your values are garbage. See what @pitrysha did.
    Cpuid1Data D4060300 00000000 00000000 00000000
    Cpuid1Mask FFFFFFFF 00000000 00000000 00000000
     
    As for ProcessorType, you set 0xF01, but it is only compatible with 8, 10, 14, or 18 cores.
  20. Like
    nmano reacted to vit9696 in OpenCore Discussion   
    Hi @nmano, could you please explain why do you use patches for XCPM support for Xeons in a separate topic? OpenCore should have these builtin as explained in https://github.com/acidanthera/bugtracker/issues/365. We got a question from a user who found this and got very confused as this is definitely not what we designed.
    Cpuid1Data/Cpuid1Mask are a replacement for xcpm_bootstrap patch (and FakeCPUID), and they should really be <d4 06 03 00 (fake id)…> <ff ff ff ff… all zeroes> correspondingly. AppleXcpmCfgLock and AppleXcpmExtraMsrs should cover all the other patches Perhaps something went wrong? Could you please provide us with the details?
  21. Like
    nmano reacted to fabiosun in OpenCore Discussion   
    @nmano why do you need of those Patches?
    Your CPU inserted on an ASUS x299 Sage 10g does not need any pathcing for it..only msr unlock to enable in motherboard bios
    gigabyte x299 should also be unlocked (x299 designare ex was)
     
     
     
  22. Like
    nmano reacted to pitrysha in OpenCore Discussion   
    Then it turns out cpu emulation is not working ?



    Архив.zip
  23. Like
    nmano reacted to vit9696 in OpenCore Discussion   
    @pitrysha, in your archive you fake to a CPU without XCPM support, I don't know what for and hot it is supposed to work. Most likely it should be d4 06 03 or c3 06 03.
  24. Like
    nmano reacted to pitrysha in OpenCore Discussion   
    Thanks . Everything works .
    2020-01-10 в 17.36.45.zip
  25. Like
    nmano reacted to PMheart in OpenCore Discussion   
    Hi @obus and @fabiosun
     
    Could you please try if these two patches work? (which is supposed to perform the same thing as what FakeCPUID in Clover does)
     
    #1 Base: _cpuid_set_info Comment: FakeCPUID - Model 0xE (0x5E, SKL), 10.14 Count: 1 Enabled: YES Find: 89C1C0E904880D Identifier: kernel Limit: 0 Mask: (LEAVE THIS EMPTY) MatchKernel: 18. Replace: B90E000000880D ReplaceMask: (LEAVE THIS EMPTY) Skip: 0 #2 Base: _cpuid_set_info Comment: FakeCPUID - Ext 0x5 (0x5E, SKL), 10.14 Count: 1 Enabled: YES Find: 89C1C1E91080 Identifier: kernel Limit: 0 Mask: (LEAVE THIS EMPTY) MatchKernel: 18. Replace: B90500000080 ReplaceMask: (LEAVE THIS EMPTY) Skip: 0  
    Or this full Patch entry:
    <key>Kernel</key> <dict> <key>Patch</key> <array> <dict> <key>Base</key> <string>_cpuid_set_info</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>FakeCPUID - Model 0xE (0x5E, SKL), 10.14</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data> icHA6QSIDQ== </data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data> </data> <key>MatchKernel</key> <string>18.</string> <key>Replace</key> <data> uQ4AAACIDQ== </data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data> </data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> <dict> <key>Base</key> <string>_cpuid_set_info</string> <key>Comment</key> <string>FakeCPUID - Ext 0x5 (0x5E, SKL), 10.14</string> <key>Count</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>Find</key> <data> icHB6RCA </data> <key>Identifier</key> <string>kernel</string> <key>Limit</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>Mask</key> <data> </data> <key>MatchKernel</key> <string>18.</string> <key>Replace</key> <data> uQUAAACA </data> <key>ReplaceMask</key> <data> </data> <key>Skip</key> <integer>0</integer> </dict> </array> </dict>  
    Note: Assuming that both of you are using and testing under 10.14, those 2 patches above were made based off 10.14.4 (18E226), for earlier versions, please send me the kernel and I will take a look.
×