Jump to content
InsanelyMac Forum

Marmite

Members
  • Content count

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Marmite

  • Rank
    InsanelyMac Protégé

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    London, UK
  • Interests
    Coding, Climbing, Photography and Energy Drinks.
  1. That's weird, when I press ALT it shows me the "Detect Displays" button.. but that does nothing I have noticed some slight issues with scrollbars as well, so pondering whether I need to consider my graphics card again; but that definitely is recognised! Asus GeForce GT 520: Chipset Model: Asus GeForce GT 520 Type: GPU Bus: PCIe Slot: Slot-1 PCIe Lane Width: x16 VRAM (Total): 1024 MB Vendor: NVIDIA (0x10de) Device ID: 0x0de4 Revision ID: 0x00a1 ROM Revision: rsion 70.08.5C.00.00 Displays: Acer V203H: Resolution: 1024 x 768 Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888) Display Serial Number: LF4080054200 Main Display: Yes Mirror: Off Online: Yes ==== Asus GeForce GT 520: Name: NVDA,Display-B Type: Display Controller Driver Installed: Yes MSI: No Bus: PCI Slot: Slot-1 Vendor ID: 0x10de Device ID: 0x0de4 Subsystem Vendor ID: 0x1043 Subsystem ID: 0x83d2 ROM Revision: rsion 70.08.5C.00.00 Revision ID: 0x00a1 Link Width: x16 Link Speed: 2.5 GT/s That said my display serial number is also correct with the EDID I set. Sigh!
  2. haha, I can understand your shock but no! Unfortunately Mac OS X doesn't seem to want to detect my monitor correctly, but I suspect that's due to an issue with the age of my monitor. Either that, or Mavericks' hatred of VGA.. I did post another thread about it - http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/topic/294539-incorrect-resolution-but-gfx-card-is-detected-correctly-nv-210/?do=findComment&comment=1975347 - but the crux of it was after trying a fair few solutions I decided I may as well just buy a nice modern display with HDMI input and 1080p reso. (Currently using an old 1600x900 display with VGA) Oh! Now that's pretty interesting actually! I figured that as the gfx was recognised that was it..! I shall give that a go, I think I used Kext Utility since to check the permissions in the directory since. However I definitely didn't add my device ID to any of the kexts.. doh! Perhaps there is a possible solution to my resolution issues then. I'll still treat myself to a new display (Just means I can wait a little later and try and get a bargain in the sales)
  3. Update time! I have a suspicion this may be down to my display itself, it's about 4 years old now - and despite being a very good servant for those years - it probably is time to relinquish it to a new owner and treat myself to a new one. Not only is it 4 years old, it's also relying on a VGA<->DVI-I adaptor.. that's not going to be making matters easier! Hopefully before Christmas, although I think it may be after Christmas now unfortunately (damn payday!!), I will get a HDMI compliant one and switch over to HDMI completely. I think this will alleviate these issues. Additionally.. Bring on 1920x1080! (I've been living with 1600x900 till now.) To be honest it's not that urgent - I'm a developer by profession and work exclusively in a Mac environment, I just need to brush up on my Objective-C a little in my spare time for a future project. I can code with a mangled up display.. Cheers for everyone's help! I've certainly learnt a lot..
  4. Aha, thats a new one on me! I copied the .plist file in question and found it had next to no information in it for me to modify. As I can't change my resolution I couldn't even force System Preferences to generate me a new one. So I backed it up, and removed it from it's original directory - restarted and it had generated me an identical one, with no information in. I'm going to see if I can find any examples anywhere so I can see what kind of format/keys it expects information to be provided in. For the record though, here is the information it contained: Not a great deal. There are no silly questions! I do indeed have my display set to "Best for Display"; and even if I select "Scaled" I can only get the same 1024x768! Interestingly, when tinkering earlier on - even trying to rotate the display it had no effect.
  5. Mmmm.. Had a bottle of beer whilst doing some more tinkering and I'm now completely out of ideas. 1) The Override is working. Check. The new display name is coming up in "System Report" and "About My Mac". 2) The EDID is being picked up correctly, and when ran through parse-edid and other tools it verifies as OK. (Without going through the whole EDID spec I can't be 100% sure it's correct and without errors, but it looks it.) $ ioreg -lw0 | grep IODisplayEDID | sed "/[^<]*</s///" | xxd -p -r ??????r??y??0h,x*ZL?&PT????@??qO/&@?`?00 5???8K/F ?LF4080054200 ?Acer V203H $ ioreg -lw0 | grep IODisplayEDID | sed "/[^<]*</s///" 00ffffffffffff00047281009979808430120103682c19782aee95a35a4c99260f5054bfef8081808100814081c0714f0101010101012f2640a060841a3030203500bbf91000001a000000fd00384b2f460e000a202020202020000000ff004c46343038303035343230300a000000fc00416365722056323033480a20200075 3) My Graphics Card(s) are being detected correctly. When using both the nVidia 520 and the nVidia 210 they are recognised and displayed with the correct amount of memory and correct names in "System Report". 4) This isn't a VGA specific issue. This occurs with both DVI and VGA output, from both cards. Is there anything obvious that I'm missing? Perhaps going off of the System Report isn't the best way of verifying my graphics card is functioning correctly? Perhaps there's another way of forcing EDID recognition/overrides? Is there some kext file I should've looked at? I did a google for NVidia 520 and Mavericks and just got people saying it worked OOB for them! Although I did also see mention of a new nvidia driver for 10.9 ( http://www.osx86.net/files/file/3565-new-109-nvidia-gt-520-native-lastest-driver/ ) - but I have no idea what they were on about, as there isn't a new native driver and in their upload was just a solitary .kext for something post-driver install related. sigh Very confused!
  6. That's just done generated an identical override but with the the DisplayVendorID and DisplayProductID set as an iMac; so the display appears as an iMac but it's still using the EDID from before - so there's no change. However I'm still getting a widescreen image on About My Mac: (Except now it says "iMac") I'm pondering whether it's an issue with EDID - and the way I abstracted it. I did take a dump of all the info parsed from the EDID when I was in my Linux boot, mainly as an aid in case I have driver issues in Linux at any time and need to modify Xorg. I may try and use the information I've got to generate something using SwitchResX; but I don't feel too confident about that either tbh. Edit: Pah, SwitchResX had no effect other than changing my display name again; if it wasn't for this I'd think the overrides were targetting a different display!
  7. So weird! Did the Display override using the EDID I acquired through my linux boot - and it now recognises the name of display (most likely due to the string in the override).. but that's all. Still no default resolution or any ability to change the resolution at all. I tried it with both graphics cards too. Absolutely stumped now..
  8. Cheers guys! haha, Oops! That explains a lot.. I thought I was making a mistake when typing it in. I have GraphicsEnabler set to Yes with my nvidia 520 (I just popped it in to test). I have a feeling I tried it with the 210 but it made no difference. That! I think that's the exact link I had in mind when I wrote the last paragraph of my original post, thankyou! I shall try that (probably tomorrow morning as I need to pop out now) and report back.
  9. So I've managed to get my system running nicely; even dualbooting with Mint Linux! Audio is crystal clear and pretty impressive really, everything is functioning correctly - you could even say flawlessly, it's perfect. Except for my Display; it's at the wrong resolution - and even aspect ratio. Now I say Display as my graphics card appears to be detected correctly and I'm not seeing any adverse performance issues regarding using it. (I can stream videos, play videos and do multiple tasks that include graphics intensive activity without any performance issues) Here's how my Graphics Card is displayed in System Report: Everything appears correctly. Note this is after implementing an EFI string - but prior to the EFI string it was appearing correctly too. (This EFI string was just something else to cross off the list so to speak) Yet when I go to About This Mac I see this, "spdisplays_display"... Delving in to System Preferences, I can see that even going to "Scaled" only provides me with the option for 1024x768... I've tried "Graphics Mode" too, which I thought would do the job. I've tried output from both DVI-I and VGA. (BTW, Surprisingly VGA does indeed work through the 210 in Mavericks - it's only during installation that it results in a black screen with output incorrectly being sent via HDMI when you have all default NVD* kexts) Now if the Graphics Card is working correctly, and "Graphics Mode" isn't providing me with any luck, is it possible to extract the VendorID and ProductID from the Display and do something with these? (Do what? I have no idea! I just remember doing something similar a few years back, but that may have been with a Linux distribution actually..) Failing that, any ideas? I did some searching and see that this is an incredibly common side effect of other issues - but from what I've seen, most cases usually involve incorrectly recognised Graphics Cards? Currently running 10.9.0 on a system utilising 8GB of RAM (2x 4GB modules), an intel i3 at 3.3Ghz and a Gigabyte H67N-USB3 motherboard. Current graphics card is a nVidia 210 1GB - although I've just realised I have an 1GB nVidia GT510 sitting in my desk drawer that may perform a little better.. Cheers guys (and gals!)
  10. Solved. Removing the NVidia specific Kernel Extensions allowed me to install and boot up post-installation. Furthermore, I could copy them back post installation with no adverse side effects - and even use VGA. The card is recognised too. There could well be an aspect ratio issue with my display though, but I don't actually think that's the graphics card specifically.
  11. Just installed hfsplus/hfsprogs/hfsutils on my Laptop and modified the installation USB like this: MintBox / # mkdir osx86 MintBox / # cd ./mnt MintBox mnt # mount -t hfsplus -o remount,force,rw /dev/sdc1 /mnt/osx86/ MintBox mnt # cd ./osx86/System/Library/Extensions/ MintBox Extensions # rm -rf ./NVDA* MintBox Extensions # cd / MintBox / # umount /dev/sdc1 I've popped it in to my new build and booted with the following flags: -v GraphicsEnabler=Yes Now I have been able to boot in to the installation and I'm going to walk to the shop whilst it installs.. I fear I'm going to have a nightmare when it's installed! As expected the issue is down to the geniune Apple stock kext files. Fingers crossed!
  12. Ah, I can understand - and I respect that considering this forums stance regarding that area of things. (I must say, it does leave a bitter taste in my mouth too) However this issue isn't really specific to mb - it happened when making installation media directly using dd and manually inserting .kext files. Which is a bit annoying, I will probably remove the NVD* .kext files again and see where that gets me. Cheers
  13. I'm currently trying to get Mavericks running on some parts that I quickly ordered - I'd returned my MacBook Pro to my previous employer before realising I had a few things I'd been meaning to do. So I checked the HCL and bought some fairly recommended components: including this graphics card, the Nvidia 210. Initially I tried installing from a boot media configured via dd in linux - and I could boot in to the installer fine.. once I'd removed some of the NV* .kexts. Prior to that I would get a black screen. Well, due to other issues with that install media - I downloaded a copy of Mavericks from the App Store today (whilst at work) and quickly threw together a new USB installer using #####. However that dreaded black screen has come back, and I'm pondering whether there is a better way to remedy it than just removing a lot of kext files? My understanding is that Mac OS X is correctly identifying the card as having a HDMI port, and automatically sending the output to this - neglecting the DVI + VGA ports. I'm using DVI though! Am I barking up the wrong tree by reading about NVCAP? Or should I just be looking at removing the .kext files? Maybe I'm wrong all together! I've seen people discuss solving this via custom EFI strings and other mechanisms - but these are primarily post-install fixes right? I'm just trying to get through the installation itself right now! Cheers guys
  14. I suspect it could well be my hardware from here on. Everything is on the HCL; but from my last little hackintosh adventures I remember things getting a little confusing at times.. When I boot in to the installer I get a message that Mac OS X cannot be installed, but I can restore from a backup if I want. Going to the installation log is pretty rubbish - as it just says "Installation checks failed"; whilst booting in verbose mode shows no hardware issues. However, I can do everything else through the USB drive - terminal, disk utility, system information and time-machine backups. So I think the USB is OK!
  15. Aha, that's changed the error completely! I'm getting one about "Installation Checks Failed" - which could well be the very nature of hackintosh and my hardware - so in actual fact that may well have fixed the error...
×