~pcwiz
Nov 15 2007, 02:03 AM
EVERYTHING has been changed once again (Feb 2008). Please scroll down to post #39 and read
As per request from the older "My Sites New Design" thread I have done another redesign of the site. Original design by Mesh, Converted to HTML by skyhighmac. The site works well on resolutions of 1024x768 and above. If the new design doesn't appear at first or if a page looks scrambled, please refresh a few times.
Check it out:
http://pcwizcomputer.com
And rate.
I think it looks pretty awesome, somewhat better than by older design. This is the 2nd redesign in less than 3 weeks so this is the last complete redesign I will be doing for a while to come.
skyhighmac
Nov 15 2007, 03:22 AM
Feedback please.
vectran
Nov 15 2007, 03:32 AM
From a quick look at it. I feel the header/logo is a bit plain and the border colour transition is a bit awkward.
~pcwiz
Nov 15 2007, 03:44 AM
The header is a bit plain but it shows what its supposed to, the title. Any suggestions though on what I can do to improve the header?
EDIT: The drop down menu in the Software section doesn't appear properly in IE 6 but it shows properly in Firefox. Any idea why?
EDIT2: Never mind, fixed.
inimicus
Nov 15 2007, 03:09 PM
Hm, looks familiar.
Definite improvements.
I'm curious. What happened to the footer? The forum's page footer looks much better.
Typography could use improvement. Notice in my example how there is more space between articles and sections? If you don't want to group things together as much as I did, at least add another line break after each article to make it easier to read.
On the index, the Navigation section must go. You're not teaching a class of neanderthals -- this is a no brainer. And nobody is gonna care about your alternate URL, no matter how neat it might seem. Put something useful here instead.
And seriously? Still Google ads? Are you _really_ anticipating that much traffic to warrant these eye-sores? At least get rid of the banner at the top of each section.
Ideally you'd also get rid of the search at the top... but since that probably won't go over well with you, at least get rid of the radio buttons (just put the pcwiz value into a hidden form element), rename the submit button to "Go", and have "Search" already as a value in the text field for clarity. Then stick it in the navigation bar. Ahhh. It feels less ugly just thinking about it.
skyhighmac
Nov 15 2007, 06:10 PM
Just never noticed the foot, thanks, I'll see if pcwiz wants it.
~pcwiz
Nov 15 2007, 09:02 PM
One thing I am not willing to do:
Take out the Google Ads. They are my ONLY source of income (not a lot I'll tell you), just a little bit more than thats needed to cover the web hosting costs.
skyhighmac, could you follow inimicus's advice about the search box and the footer? I'll send you my modified template as soon as I have access to my home computer so you can make the neccessary changes to it. For the search box, the text field will have to be shortened for it to fit in the nav bar on lower resolutions.
I will also remove the Navigation and alternate URL stuff but what do you suggest I place in the index page?
I am still looking for advice on what to do about the header cause I do agree it is somewhat plain and after the search box is take out of there its gonna be plain-ER.
inimicus
Nov 15 2007, 11:16 PM
The index is the first page most users see. Make an impression.
Use this spot for news, featured articles, something interesting. Don't let this page stagnate, it will only turn off visitors. This should be the most updated page. It should kindle interest. It shouldn't spell out every aspect of your site... especially when your target audience is what it is.
User interaction never hurt, either. Allow visitors to comment the articles. Even though you do have a forum, this is a more direct way to get feedback.
skyhighmac
Nov 15 2007, 11:17 PM
About the google ads, I know how much he pays a month, and if the ads just cover it, then that is very little. Do you think I should change the search or delete it?
cbmkgd
Nov 16 2007, 12:22 AM
I don't notice the ads... but then I have AdBlockPlus. So can't comment on how they affect the look.
Overall the look is
much better than before.
Now, about the code...
Again try to edit a central css (or many); it won't affect the visual look, but will simplify further changes, especially if the site grows.
Also, I've seen this code in the
software section:
CODE
<p align="left" class="text-left style5 style6"><span class="style5 style7"><span class="style8"><span class="style6"><span class="style10"><span class="style6"><strong><a href="tweakuiguide.htm">Power Up Windows XP with TweakUI </a></strong></span></span></span></span></span> </p>
I don't know how
dreamweaver got you there, but it's evidently too much. I didn't mention it in the other thread, but now that you've tackled the right look, it thought it was time to point it out.
I haven't looked at all the pages' source, but only that one page up to now had this problem.
Other than that, again code-wise, since you use style-sheets, there's really no need for the "font" tags; they don't give problems in the final look, but for further changes it'll be easier to migrate to css. Two particular examples are found (in the source) here:
http://pcwizcomputer.com/software/tweakuiguide.htm ,
http://pcwizcomputer.com/software/todowininstall.htmAn example in the second link is:
CODE
<li style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, sans-serif">
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, sans-serif" align="left">
<font face="Verdana" style="font-size: 9pt">Repeat driver installation process for all hardware
</font>
</div>
</li>
Which font face did you want? You'll get Verdana 9pt in the end here. But in any case, it seems 9pt/12px is the usual size you are using all over the site
for normal text, and a sans-serif font; since these are your standard, chose one and put it in the style sheet for the "p", "li" and "div" tags, or whichever variations you'd like, and you won't need the extraneous code above. No need to mix px and pt: chose the one you prefer and stick to it.
For the second example above, you'll end up with the much simpler:
CODE
<li>Repeat driver installation process for all hardware</li>
(you don't really need the "div", if your "li" is well defined)
A clean code will always be easier to manage, and style sheets will help.
Notwithstanding these details (which again don't affect the look), you're on the right track; the rest (code and look) is mainly tweakings.
It does look like a geeky site, but after all it
is. Can't make an artsy site with pc tweakings etc.
~pcwiz
Nov 16 2007, 12:34 AM
I think I'll worry about the tiny problems that don't affect the look later. For now, I need to perfect the actual look

QUOTE(inimicus @ Nov 15 2007, 03:16 PM)

The index is the first page most users see. Make an impression.Use this spot for news, featured articles, something interesting. Don't let this page stagnate, it will only turn off visitors. This should be the most updated page. It should kindle interest. It shouldn't spell out every aspect of your site... especially when your target audience is what it is.User interaction never hurt, either. Allow visitors to comment the articles. Even though you do have a forum, this is a more direct way to get feedback.
The news is what the RSS feed is for. I can't think of any creative ideas? Can you give me some
specifc examples?
QUOTE(skyhighmac @ Nov 15 2007, 03:17 PM)

About the google ads, I know how much he pays a month, and if the ads just cover it, then that is very little. Do you think I should change the search or delete it?
Well actually...the ads more than cover the web hosting costs but I'll tell you right now, every month I get enough money to buy one average priced video game. So you can get a pretty close estimate

As for the search, I think you should change it based on iniminus's suggestion rather than delete it.
~pcwiz
Nov 16 2007, 06:07 AM
Footer and search has been modified according to inimicus's suggestion.
2 things I am still looking for:
1) Suggestions for header, because it looks plain
2) SPECIFIC suggestions for stuff to put on the index page. I haven't removed the Navigation part yet because the Navigation thing is sort of a "filler" for the page. If you take it out the index page looks very bare.
inimicus
Nov 16 2007, 10:30 AM
Well, if having a repulsive site is justified by buying a few video games a month... then more power to you.
I've already given you specific ideas about the index. So what if the news ss already in RSS? If you have to resort to filler information, then what's the point? Have the site point to your favorite article page, then!
There's plenty you can do to keep interest. Such as..
...Wait, aren't you the one that's providing the content? Everyone else is doing the other work for you. I thought _you_ were the content guy, right?
I'm glad someone pointed out the code... it was giving me fits. But what is to be expected of Dreamweaver...?
Since you already treat this as a money-making project... why don't you start thinking of it as one? Think about your visitors as customers and your content as the product. What keeps visitors? What gathers interest? How can you maintain interest? What do visitors like and want to see?
This would make everything much easier for you...
skyhighmac
Nov 16 2007, 06:04 PM
I just looked at the code that I did (template file) and it is much cleaner than that.
~pcwiz
Nov 16 2007, 11:57 PM
inimicus,
That fact that you say that its a "moneymaking" project makes me very mad. Long time pcwiz users may recall that the site never had any ads until about less than a year ago when I was suggested to try Google AdSense!! And the video game thing was just an example. I'm saving to build a new hackint0sh. Is that so bad? And you call the site "repulsive" just because it has ads? Most non-personal sites nowadays do have ads (including InsanelyMac)! My site is not bloated with ads, just 2 banner ads a page.
I NEVER EVER think of my users as "customers". I am not a cheap business-man OK? IT IS NOT A "moneymaking" PROJECT!! Users are free to use the site and use as they please. All the content is FREE to view and use for a reason.
Please never ever say something like this again without knowing what you are saying. It makes people more outraged than you think. It seems that you are insulting just because there are ads on pages.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Back to actual business (no, inimicus, not money making business

). I still need suggestions for the header and index content. Any ideas skyhighmac? I need actual specific ideas because I an running out. You don't have to give me the wording for the index content, just a slightly more specific idea.
And the code skyhighmac did is CLEAN. That code thing like in the software section that cbmkgd pointed out is probably because I didn't retype it, just cut and pasted.
inimicus
Nov 17 2007, 08:39 AM
I typed my last response quickly... some things appear to be misinterpreted. Allow me to try again.
======================
Well, if having a site with ads that don't fit in (see: eye-sores, white-on-black) is justified by buying a few video games a month... then more power to you.
[The best ads are ads that visitors don't notice. Yes, some are text only ads... but it's often that a white banner will come up on the black page. Ouch. Undeniably ugly.]
I've already given you specific ideas about the index. So what if the news is already in RSS? If you have to resort to filler information, then what's the point? Have the site point to your favorite article page, then!
[There's actual SPECIFIC ideas for you... NEWS. FEATURED ARTICLES.]
There's plenty you can do to keep interest. Such as..
...Wait, aren't you the one that's providing the content? Everyone else is doing the other work for you. I thought _you_ were the content guy, right? [Right???]
I'm glad someone pointed out the code... it was giving me fits. But what is to be expected of Dreamweaver...?
Since you already treat this as a resource to bring in money... why don't you start thinking of it as one? Think about your visitors as visitors and your content as the content. What keeps visitors? What gathers interest? How can you maintain interest? What do visitors like and want to see?
[Repeated for emphasis: What keeps visitors? What gathers interest? How can you maintain interest? What do visitors like and want to see? This is the most important part of a web-site... Answer these questions and your look, feel, and function will be already pre-defined! Stuck on something? Think about this. And there's your answer.]
This would make everything much easier for you...
=====================
Not sure why this got you so uptight. Probably still does, too. But that's okay. Talk to any other long-time web designer and they'll tell you the same things.
Such as: No, this source is not clean. I'm not sure which one you're looking at, but the one that I pull from my browser is anything but clean. But that's okay -- as long as it doesn't affect the way the page is displayed -- fine.
I admit my words can be harsh at times. I don't beat around the bush. I'm not teaching third graders -- we're all adults, we can handle it. But the things I say are said for a reason. Chances are I have the experience to justify them. One way or another, I am trying to help. Just think... if I never replied, you'd probably still be using that Windows 98 Legacy site.
~pcwiz
Nov 17 2007, 04:17 PM
No doubt that you have contributed a lot but I will keep the ads. Meanwhile, skyhighmac is making a Header banner so we can see how that turns out.
EDIT: And don't be so quick to say that we're ALL adults

inimicus,
Do you know how to make like a news feed thing on the index page (like new discoveries, tech news, etc.) that grabs all its data from the RSS channel?
skyhighmac
Nov 17 2007, 04:48 PM
Just to let you know, the rss links don't work.
~pcwiz
Nov 18 2007, 12:56 AM
RSS works fine here on Firefox. I've tested it with IE and it doesn't work so browsers that don't support RSS won't be able to view it.
P.S. skyhighmac,
Read the email reply I sent you about the G5 case header banner.
skyhighmac
Nov 18 2007, 07:02 PM
I meant the link on the articles when reading the rss feed.
~pcwiz
Nov 18 2007, 07:46 PM
What links? Don't see any links

P.S. Sorry for asking you again but how are you doing with the header banner? If its too much work, I can do it myself but could you send me a copy of the Myriad font because I can't find it.
Suhail
Dec 9 2007, 09:40 PM
Myriad is a commercial font by Adobe. Not Freeware

Also look at some of the errors the w3 validator coughed up:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%...ine&group=0Intresting look but not at all appealing. IMHO it is too dull and boring. If you want inspiration check out:
http://www.cssremix.com/Also maybe try blending colors with one color scheme. If you can't think of one then
http://kuler.adobe.com is a excellent resource
Just my honest opinion.
~pcwiz
Dec 9 2007, 10:04 PM
I DLed Myriad from the net 4 free
hecker
Dec 10 2007, 08:09 AM
It still feels a little plain but I would definitely say that it's an improvement over the original one.
Keep up the good work!
~pcwiz
Dec 10 2007, 11:27 PM
Thanks!
Suhail
Dec 15 2007, 12:00 PM
Maybe step away from the dark and come into the light is my suggestion.
Darrious
Dec 27 2007, 01:14 AM
Yeah, I do agree a bit. I think it might need to be brightened up, but all in all, it's awesome. I like it a lot.
ozboi
Jan 2 2008, 02:47 AM
The forum looks terrible in Safari 3 on MacOSX Leopard (see attachment). Also site-wide many of the background images aren't working which makes the site look only half finished. Much of the site (not the forum but everywhere else) has normal text that looks like it's bolded, which looks awful. You may also want to set the line-height for your <p> tags so the lines are more spread out, which will make those long lines of text easier to read.
OT: In your article on PearPC you might want to mention that running OSX on a PC (or anything other than genuine Mac hardware) violates the Terms of Service of the operating system and is therefore just as illegal as downloading the OS from the internet
methamp
Jan 7 2008, 09:11 PM
pcwiz, not designwiz, right? Don't quit your day job.
~pcwiz
Jan 8 2008, 01:15 AM
QUOTE(ozboi @ Jan 1 2008, 06:47 PM)

The forum looks terrible in Safari 3 on MacOSX Leopard (see attachment). Also site-wide many of the background images aren't working which makes the site look only half finished. Much of the site (not the forum but everywhere else) has normal text that looks like it's bolded, which looks awful. You may also want to set the line-height for your <p> tags so the lines are more spread out, which will make those long lines of text easier to read.
OT: In your article on PearPC you might want to mention that running OSX on a PC (or anything other than genuine Mac hardware) violates the Terms of Service of the operating system and is therefore just as illegal as downloading the OS from the internet

@ozboi
To be honest I don't see any problems with it other than some bold text but does it really look that bad? I wouldn't go as far to say as its "terrible", in fact it doesn't disturb me at all although some others may not agree. The person who made the forum design is called "Bloc" and is renound for making excellent mods and themes for SMF forums and I had no part in making that theme so I have no control over that

Can you give me a screenshot of the background images that aren't working? I just took a look at the site in Firefox 2.0.0.11 and Internet Explorer 6 and everything looks fine to me...
The text line size thing is because I have the font on Verdana 9pt. Switching it to 10pt fixes that problem.
@Darrious,
PearPC is not *as* illegal as OSx86 and its only violating one EULA term (running OS X on non Apple hardware) but its using legal copies of OS X so...not too many problems there but I guess I'll add that note.
EDIT: Note added
qbattersby
Feb 1 2008, 01:34 AM
pcwiz, I'll be honest, Im not overly keen on the design, when I have some more time I can list some reasons why. Although I have a proposition if you would like, when I have some time I could put together a general layout for you to work from. I could code it but I dont have the time so I can offer the design if you are interested. Give me a little insight as to what you are looking for, I'm personally keen on darker colours, but I think for your target market a lighter colour would be more appropriate as the users are expected to read the content and the black is hard on the eyes.Let me know, just drop me a PM or in hereI have assisted in design of both www.clippitch.com and www.singlesdeluxe.com - my personal site which I am currently revamping is www.qbattersby.com (still deeply in the works)Take a peek
~pcwiz
Feb 1 2008, 04:17 AM
qbattersby,
I may be interested, just PMed you
Kiko
Feb 1 2008, 05:06 AM
it looks like {censored}, (and im not just saying this because i wish you burn in hell pcwiz). The dark look is really really old, and it just looks plain tacky. i recommend looking at some web design sites to get some ideas about a newer, lighter look. (also dont waste your time making the site 1024x768 compliant, those assholes can go burn along with ie6 users), when i was doing some web work all ie6 and 1024x768 did was give me hell, i stopped worrying about older legacy users and my designs and workflow improved greatly. Also, learn some CSS and use it. Have external stylesheets for everything you can, it just makes it easier to update the site and add small tweaks to it.
ps: clippitch looks foul, no offence meant
pps: only dumbasses find school hard
qbattersby
Feb 1 2008, 05:38 AM
Hey I assisted with clip pitch, I did not create all of the content. And for what it is, it fits. Take a look at one of the most successful online video sites (youtube) and see if you notice and similarities. What works works. Plain and simple. And I never claimed clippitch was a creative genius. I take no offence but I just want to state I never said it was sexy by any means.
SticMAC™
Feb 1 2008, 05:50 AM
Is there something wrong with the ADD on :
http://pcwizcomputer.com/downloads/index.htm i cant see any of the writing?
SticMAN
Kiko
Feb 1 2008, 07:05 AM
thankgod you didnt qbattersby, cause i would have to hunt you down and kill you, its fugly
qbattersby
Feb 1 2008, 01:46 PM
@SticMan> Everything appears fine to me, on Firefox, haven't looked in Safari.
@Kiko> Giggidy
~pcwiz
Feb 2 2008, 05:15 PM
Everyone, a new bright design is coming soon. Its a surprise
~pcwiz
Feb 17 2008, 09:50 PM
Well the new design is here. Actually, its more than a new design, the entire site has been converted to Joomla! Heres what it looks like now:
Click to view attachmentI'm sure mac users will like it

And everything has been bridged into one login (except for the blog) and into the same interface.
SticMAC™
Feb 17 2008, 10:06 PM
Hey WIZZ, now it's beginning to look like a REAL website!!!
Keep up the good work!
SticMAN
~pcwiz
Feb 17 2008, 10:10 PM
SticMAN,
QUOTE
now it's beginning to look like a REAL website!!!
Well then lets see your genius REAL website

jk jk
Anyway, thank you. And it seems that many liked it, I got like 3000 site hits the first day the new design was released.
SticMAC™
Feb 18 2008, 02:10 PM
watch and learn, dear boy, watch and learn.....
http://www.porsche.co.za/(must add, all the information, videos etc is supplied!)
QUOTE(~pcwiz @ Feb 17 2008, 11:10 PM)

SticMAN,
Well then lets see your genius REAL website

jk jk
Anyway, thank you. And it seems that many liked it, I got like 3000 site hits the first day the new design was released.
Careless
Feb 19 2008, 01:21 AM
QUOTE(SticMAN @ Feb 18 2008, 09:10 AM)

watch and learn, dear boy, watch and learn.....
http://www.porsche.co.za/(must add, all the information, videos etc is supplied!)
what does that have to do with his current design? you're comparing two completely different target audiences.
I do like the porsche site, but I myself have designed some joomla, and some standard HTML sites that would fit a lot better into the area in which the pcwiz site resides.
It could work, but I can think of a bunch of other examples I've created myself, or that I've seen that would be much better suited.
~pcwiz
Feb 20 2008, 02:52 AM
I don't get what could be more suitable for a computer site than a mac inspired theme...The theme I am using is specifically mac themed.
inimicus
Feb 21 2008, 06:11 AM
Now you just need a favicon.
The cherry on the sundae.
SticMAC™
Feb 21 2008, 06:57 AM
Next time before you comment, and i have to rub your nose in it.....
We were talikng about web DESIGN not content and target market, DESIGN!!
now go and do your homework!
SticMAN
QUOTE(Careless @ Feb 19 2008, 02:21 AM)

what does that have to do with his current design? you're comparing two completely different target audiences.
I do like the porsche site, but I myself have designed some joomla, and some standard HTML sites that would fit a lot better into the area in which the pcwiz site resides.
It could work, but I can think of a bunch of other examples I've created myself, or that I've seen that would be much better suited.
Colonel
Feb 22 2008, 03:49 AM
Looks kinda like the old osx86project website...
carfalkar
Feb 22 2008, 05:38 AM
looks like the old moofspeak website.
OH WAIT.
inimicus
Feb 24 2008, 07:33 AM
Welcome to open source.
~pcwiz
Feb 28 2008, 04:24 AM
inimicus,
Thanks
carfalkar and Colonel,
Thanks you have been very helpful with your lines of trash. Admins please contact Ramm's ISP and tell them to shut his net connection down
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.