Both work on my geforce 6600 .. but which is better??
I'm only interested in a single display... which is faster.. is there a clear choice here or are they equally good?

On my GeForce 6200, Titan provides better OpenGL benchmark scores. Disable beamsync, enable quartz 2d extreme, and then xbench your gfx card with each driver installed.

but which one gives dual screen? and, how do you disable beamsync and enable others?

Natit DUAL (called Diabolik or something like that in other places) gives dual screen; just plain old Natit is for single monitor support. You can have this installed alongside Titan, and it will give you both dual-screen capabilities and better OpenGL performance. If you don't need dual-screen, I would just stick with Titan.

To disable beamsync and enable Q2DE: http://forum.insanelymac.com/lofiversion/i...php/t11550.html

Xbench is far from being something to prove graphics performance.
Use real games to benchmark a 3D Graphics card, or at least, OpenGL benchmarks like OpenGL extension viewer and OpenMark (but these are not very complete benchmarks anyway)

Other NVIDIA enablers like nvidiaEFI or NVinject usually set your display settings faster than NATIT.

I'm using Titan for my 6800GS, I couldn't get Natit to work all the way, Titan worked 100% the first time.

the post is really old, and the file is not there anymore.