Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Geekbench 2.0
InsanelyMac Forum > Discuss and Learn > Mods and Overclocking > Benchmarks
Pages: 1, 2
jfpoole
Hi folks,

I'm John, the developer behind Geekbench. I thought I'd let y'all know that there's a new version of Geekbench available. I think Geekbench 2.0 is a huge improvement over Geekbench 2006, and I hope you'll think so, too.

You can download both the Mac OS X and Windows versions of Geekbench 2.0 from the Geekbench website.

If you've got any questions, please let me know.
Colonel
Awesome work, jfpoole. biggrin.gif
Ramm
Let's see how well my X86 system performs....

tongue.gif This is what I get for having a hackintosh:

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/95
The Baron
QUOTE(Ramm @ Mar 6 2007, 09:24 PM) *
Let's see how well my X86 system performs....

tongue.gif This is what I get for having a hackintosh:

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/95


And mine....

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/103

Not bad for a Celeron!
Colonel
My iBook G3's, my MacBook's, and my AMD box's ratings. biggrin.gif

http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/profile/27
Fiendskull9
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/119

biggrin.gif

damn colonel and his bangin machines

colonels are made for chicken making!

not geekbenching!

-clay
mac-mini
let me get mine while i'm waiting for my serial number

EDIT: where is linux?
Colonel
I've created a patch that will allow Geekbench to run on 10.3.x-based Macs. More info and a download link are on my blog.

http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?aut...p;showentry=232
erbic
Higher is better, right? I got around 3K on my Macbook Pro, but I can't remember the submitted result number. Let me re-run it...

EDIT: Here it is.... 3062.
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/129
Ramm
I wonder how a Quad 3.0 ghz Mac Pro with an nVidia Quadro FX and 16 gb of ram scores...

Prediction: 6000+
Soündless
lets find out, who wants to start a donation thing?
Kiko
As long as i get the mac pro for testing purposes, im all for it.

I'll post my new geekbench when i get home, as usual, i expect myself to pwn everyone else. tongue.gif
jfpoole
QUOTE(Kiko @ Mar 6 2007, 10:56 PM) *
As long as i get the mac pro for testing purposes, im all for it.


I really think that as the developer behind Geekbench, I should be the one that gets the system. whistle.gif

Speaking of scores, you can view my Geekbench scores here.
tops
My GeekBench Score

Might I ask, what is LU Composition, and why did I score so terribly low on it? Hehe smile.gif
Kiko
http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/profile/44
/me does a little dance

Just wondering, is a 64-bit version in the works?
lord_muad_dib
does it work on a PIII 500 mhz? biggrin.gif that's what i have here at work tongue.gif

Platform: Windows x86 (32-bit)
Compiler: Visual C++ 2005
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional
Model: IBM 6893520
Motherboard: IBM 6893520
Processor:
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 7 Stepping 3
Logical Processors: 1
Physical Processors: 1
Processor Frequency: 497 MHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 0.00 B
L1 Data Cache: 0.00 B
L2 Cache: 512 KB
L3 Cache: 0.00 B
Bus Frequency: 100.0 MHz
Memory: 320 MB
Memory Type: SDRAM 10 MHz
SIMD: 1

Integer (Score: 316)
Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 269, 1.0, 11.8 MB/sec
Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 288, 1.0, 11.8 MB/sec
Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 288, 1.0, 946.4 KB/sec
Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 278, 1.0, 935.1 KB/sec
Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 320, 1.0, 1.32 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 325, 1.0, 1.30 MB/sec
Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 328, 1.0, 2.71 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 322, 1.0, 2.71 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 306, 1.0, 5.15 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 315, 1.0, 5.15 Mpixels/sec
Crafty Chess single-threaded scalar -- 319, 1.0, 161.3 Knodes/sec
Crafty Chess multi-threaded scalar -- 330, 1.0, 160.3 Knodes/sec
Lua single-threaded scalar -- 370, 1.0, 142.6 Knodes/sec
Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 369, 1.0, 142.2 Knodes/sec

Floating Point (Score: 300)
Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 322, 1.0, 214.4 Mflops
Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 327, 1.0, 214.3 Mflops
Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 238, 1.0, 115.4 Mflops
Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 254, 1.0, 116.0 Mflops
Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 361, 3.8, 432.8 Mflops
Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 426, 3.8, 443.8 Mflops
LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 176, 1.0, 157.4 Mflops
LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 177, 1.0, 155.6 Mflops
Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 213, 1.0, 31.9 Mflops
Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 170, 1.0, 31.6 Mflops
Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 183, 1.0, 427.5 Kpixels/sec
Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 184, 1.0, 425.8 Kpixels/sec
Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 587, 1.0, 464.8 Kpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 587, 1.0, 462.0 Kpixels/sec

Memory (Score: 201)
Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 221, 1.0, 278.3 MB/sec
Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 289, 1.0, 203.1 MB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 252, 1.0, 941.5 Kallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 102, 1.0, 216.7 MB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 143, 1.0, 151.6 MB/sec

Stream (Score: 187)
Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 147, 1.0, 206.1 MB/sec
Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 236, 1.5, 314.3 MB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 150, 1.0, 199.8 MB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 216, 1.5, 299.3 MB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 156, 1.0, 241.8 MB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 242, 1.4, 346.0 MB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 172, 1.0, 243.8 MB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 181, 1.4, 348.2 MB/sec
DiaboliK
http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/profile/36

so far thats just my 915gux dev kit clone. wink.gif
my c2d cube gets 2646, but i have got to get the airport connected again (may be my u.fl connectors tongue.gif)
jfpoole
QUOTE(Kiko @ Mar 7 2007, 04:41 AM) *
Just wondering, is a 64-bit version in the works?


There is a 64-bit version in the works, and it'll be made available around the time Leopard is released (it'll be Leopard-only, too, given the 64-bit limitations present in Tiger).
adriandkicks
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/225

Thats for the system in my sig
RED USER
I got http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/2325

My result is good. laugh.gif
I'll make some new tests when i get new fan cooler.Ill try to get 3.6Ghz
kramer2k
QUOTE(Filipoex @ Mar 30 2007, 02:13 PM) *
I got http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/2325

My result is good. laugh.gif
I'll make some new tests when i get new fan cooler.Ill try to get 3.6Ghz


using geekbench 2, rosetta works fine, but the universal crashes on me! Anyone else have this problem?
See specs below
hiss
universal crashes for me as soon as I try to run it, rosetta crashes after a few mins.

JaS 10.4.8
AMD 64 3500+ SSE2
Nforce3 250gb
1gb Dual channel DDR 400mhz
Gigabyte 7600GS AGP
Boot Drive is a USB connected 40gb drive
Windows drive is SATA 200gb

Still early days for me using os x , might try it again if i set up a dual boot scenario

Will submit crash log if dev is interested?
SA22C
Seems like the universal needs SSE3 to run, which would explain why Rosetta works...
jfpoole
QUOTE(hiss @ Apr 7 2007, 07:12 AM) *
Will submit crash log if dev is interested?


Thanks for the offer, but I don't think it's necessary. There's a known problem with Geekbench 2.0.1 on AMD-based Hackintoshes which I'll hopefully be able to fix for Geekbench 2.0.2 (which I'm hoping to release sometime over the next couple of weeks). I'll keep you guys posted.
Sabr
I get 3841 on my iHack! biggrin.gif

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/2828
jfpoole
Geekbench 2.0.2 is out; it should fix the issues people are seeing on AMD-based systems.
dez
Tried Hackintosh on XEN today (copied an disk image from a workstation to a lvm partition). I assigned four prozessors cores (Opteron 2210 1,8 GHZ), 2GB Ram and started Geekbench, the first Result was abit of the hook.
12801 (http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/11219), I retried it a few times and the results where around 4500.
I tried geekbench with a Windows 2003 guest (4 proz. 2GB Ram) and got only 2600 points. (http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/11223)
Next I assigned three prozesors and got amazing 195575 points (http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/11233), the next try brought me a more realistic result (http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/11234) at about 2600.

It's nice to compare MacOsX to Windows 2003 Server on XEN, unfortunately the linux benchmark does not work.

4 Prozessors

MacOS 4547
Win2k3 2600

3 Prozessors

MacOS 2393
Win2k3 2231

2 Prozessors

MacOS 1658
Win2k3 1850

1 Prozessor

MacOS 1147
Win2k3 1324
tha_toadman
2396 here. I'm content with that.

Perhaps once I upgrade the proc and then the RAM, the numbers will climb. smile.gif
Unisex
1733 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/12300 =)
metronet
I got 6178 on my Q6600 stepping G0 I got from NCIX today.

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/12462

Not bad for a CDN$298 proccesor smile.gif
Nykwil
5625 running a Q6600 @ 3ghz

Had it as high up as 6541 running at 3.4ghz but i didnt wanna push temps since my watercooling is running on quiet noctua fans

http://browse.geekbench.ca/user/Nykwil/profile
Synaesthesia
My result is 1957. I'm very impressed, apparently my P4 3ghz is as fast as a dual G5!
Scrizz
e4400 3817 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/13365
realfolkblues
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/13441
2670 huh.gif does this thing use both cores? i get better results on xbench.
Synaesthesia
That's what I am surprised about.

Don't worry, your score is as good as a Macbook Pro!

Check out the chart
macmaniac
Got 5135 on my new hack.

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/17320

Update: After some tweaks, got 5261.

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/17395
FabricioGS
6721. Not bad for a Hackintosh biggrin.gif

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/31848

Wonder how much I would get on 64 bit.
~pcwiz
Got 4017 in 32-bit on my new computer running Windows XP Pro SP2 (full specs in sig) biggrin.gif
Allsop
Geekbench Score 10272
Version Geekbench 2.0.7
Platform Mac OS X x86 (64-bit)
Operating System Mac OS X 10.5.1 (Build 9B18)
Processor Intel® Core™2 Extreme CPU X9650 @ 3.00GHz
Model Mac Pro
Memory 4.00 GB 800 MHz DDR2 SDRAM

2:nd place @ Top Geekbench 2 Scores
yinkei
Wish i could fork out the bling for the 64bit version.

6516 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/38466
badaxe
E6320 + Badaxe 2 + 7950gt + 6gb ddr2 - Geekbench Score 3838

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/38480Platform: Mac OS X x86 (32-bit)
Compiler: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5.1 (Build 9B18)
Model: Hackintosh
Motherboard: Mac Pro
Processor: Intel® Core™2 CPU 6320 @ 1.86GHz
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
Logical Processors: 2
Physical Processors: 1
Processor Frequency: 2.80 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache: 32.0 KB
L2 Cache: 4.00 MB
L3 Cache: 0.00 B
Bus Frequency: 1.06 GHz
Memory: 6.00 GB
Memory Type: 533 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
SIMD: 1

Integer (Score: 3211)
Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 2324, 1.0, 102.1 MB/sec
Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 4702, 1.9, 192.7 MB/sec
Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 2209, 1.0, 7.07 MB/sec
Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 4038, 1.9, 13.2 MB/sec
Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1943, 1.0, 7.98 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 3828, 1.9, 15.3 MB/sec
Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 2014, 1.0, 16.6 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 3932, 2.0, 33.1 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1658, 1.0, 27.8 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 3328, 2.0, 54.3 Mpixels/sec
Crafty Chess single-threaded scalar -- 2371, 1.0, 1.20 Mnodes/sec
Crafty Chess multi-threaded scalar -- 4146, 1.7, 2.01 Mnodes/sec
Lua single-threaded scalar -- 2902, 1.0, 1.12 Mnodes/sec
Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 5561, 1.9, 2.14 Mnodes/sec

Floating Point (Score: 5266)
Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 2092, 1.0, 1.39 Gflops
Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 4220, 2.0, 2.76 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 3317, 1.0, 1.60 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 6614, 1.9, 3.01 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 2312, 1.7, 2.77 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 4802, 3.1, 4.99 Gflops
LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 830, 1.0, 739.1 Mflops
LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 1671, 2.0, 1.47 Gflops
Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 3960, 1.0, 591.4 Mflops
Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 5895, 1.8, 1.09 Gflops
Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 5637, 1.0, 13.2 Mpixels/sec
Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 10958, 1.9, 25.3 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 7287, 1.0, 5.77 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 14133, 1.9, 11.1 Mpixels/sec

Memory (Score: 3163)
Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 4335, 1.0, 5.31 GB/sec
Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 2801, 1.0, 1.92 GB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 2184, 1.0, 8.15 Mallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 3083, 1.0, 6.38 GB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 3414, 1.0, 3.52 GB/sec

Stream (Score: 2385)
Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 2374, 1.0, 3.25 GB/sec
Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 2617, 1.0, 3.39 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 2494, 1.0, 3.24 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 2478, 1.0, 3.34 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 2074, 1.0, 3.13 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 2772, 1.2, 3.86 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 2211, 1.0, 3.06 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 2066, 1.3, 3.87 GB/sec

ludacrisvp
My Geekbench

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/39972

CODE
Platform: Mac OS X x86 (32-bit)
Compiler: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
Operating System: Mac OS X 10.4.11 (Build 8L2127)
Model: Hackintosh
Motherboard: ADP2,1
Processor: AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+
Processor ID: AuthenticAMD Family 15 Model 3 Stepping 3
Logical Processors: 2
Physical Processors: 1
Processor Frequency: 2.81 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 64.0 KB
L1 Data Cache: 64.0 KB
L2 Cache: 1.00 MB
L3 Cache: 0.00 B
Bus Frequency: 400 MHz
Memory: 2.00 GB
Memory Type: 667 MHz RAM
SIMD: 1

Integer (Score: 2621)
Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 2301, 1.0, 101.1 MB/sec
Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 4861, 2.0, 199.2 MB/sec
Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 1838, 1.0, 5.88 MB/sec
Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 3372, 1.9, 11.1 MB/sec
Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1728, 1.0, 7.10 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 3413, 1.9, 13.6 MB/sec
Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 1637, 1.0, 13.5 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 3134, 1.9, 26.4 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1165, 1.0, 19.6 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 2213, 1.8, 36.1 Mpixels/sec
Crafty Chess single-threaded scalar -- 2015, 1.0, 1.02 Mnodes/sec
Crafty Chess multi-threaded scalar -- 3539, 1.7, 1.72 Mnodes/sec
Lua single-threaded scalar -- 1869, 1.0, 719.7 Knodes/sec
Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 3619, 1.9, 1.39 Mnodes/sec

Floating Point (Score: 57598)
Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 1965, 1.0, 1.31 Gflops
Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 3866, 1.9, 2.53 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 2569, 1.0, 1.24 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 753999, 276.8, 343.6 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 1675, 1.6, 2.01 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 3427, 2.9, 3.56 Gflops
LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 623, 1.0, 555.1 Mflops
LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 1232, 1.9, 1.08 Gflops
Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 2361, 1.0, 352.7 Mflops
Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 3593, 1.9, 666.9 Mflops
Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 4128, 1.0, 9.63 Mpixels/sec
Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 8002, 1.9, 18.4 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 6510, 1.0, 5.15 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 12431, 1.9, 9.77 Mpixels/sec

Memory (Score: 2827)
Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 2294, 1.0, 2.81 GB/sec
Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 2493, 1.0, 1.71 GB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 2923, 1.0, 10.9 Mallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 3579, 1.0, 7.41 GB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 2847, 1.0, 2.94 GB/sec

Stream (Score: 1858)
Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 1923, 1.0, 2.63 GB/sec
Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 2229, 1.1, 2.89 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 2083, 1.0, 2.70 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 2095, 1.0, 2.83 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 1298, 1.0, 1.96 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 2149, 1.5, 2.99 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 1458, 1.0, 2.02 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 1630, 1.5, 3.05 GB/sec


Lol!
I take the top score on the site by miles
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/top
Ice88
346G/flops for Dot Product?

Unlikely :/
HacOSXuser
My Geekbench

Awesome! atleast for my processor it is. and soon ill be getting 4more GBs of ram! and hopefully a better video card. the e4400 overclocked is defffff one beast if you do it right
exman
6169
ironicall
Here's mine tongue.gif
GeekBench score
nano2nd
6741, hardware details in sig below...

Macshiba
Geekbench Benchmark

It's not so bad. My CPU still outputs as 2.40Ghz instead of 2.63Ghz, but other than that I'm happy with it.
JRDELUNAIII
Sorry if this is a stupid nubie question, but I downloaded the GeekBench file and everytime I try to open it, all it does it loop and create another file of itself. How do you open and run this file ?? Thanks again for any info and help, trying to learn my ins and outs of this excellent OS. God Bless smile.gif
nintenno
mine:
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/55827
but the processor is really at 3.5...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.