Over at www.geekpatrol.ca, they have a benchmark program for Windows, Linux, and OSX that tests your box based on Math tests and jpeg compressions.

On the Hackintosh IRC, we did some benchmarks, and Chapel stomped everyone with his 3.5GHz Pentium D 920:

My MBP(1.83Ghz, 512MB) did somewhat decent. <.<

EDIT: added a new image showing the Mac Pro, and the Quad G5

Some Results mine is the First one


3488 Developer Transition Kit
Intel® Pentium® D CPU 3.00GHz x 2 202.8 <<<<<<<<<< Modestly mine
3485 Developer Transition Kit
Intel® Core™2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz x 2 299.7 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Core2Duo 6300 w/o overclock . WOW
3483 Developer Transition Kit
Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.20GHz x 1 145.5
3482 iMac G5 (Ambient Light Sensor)
PowerPC G5 (970) x 1 117.1
3481 Apple Computer, Inc. MacBookPro1,1
Genuine Intel® CPU T2500 @ 2.00GHz x 2 203.3
3479 Developer Transition Kit
Intel® Pentium® D CPU 3.20GHz x 2 187.4
3478 iMac G5 (Ambient Light Sensor)
PowerPC G5 (970) x 1 98.1
3477 Power Mac G5 (June 2004)
PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 164.5
3476 Power Mac G5 (June 2004)
PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 150.9
3475 Rosetta
PowerPC G4 (7400) x 2 158.8
3474 Developer Transition Kit
Intel® Pentium® D CPU 2.80GHz x 2 239.7
3473 Rosetta
PowerPC G4 (7400) x 2 85.8
3472 Power Mac G5 (June 2004)
PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 149.9
3471 Power Mac G5 (June 2004)
PowerPC G5 (970) x 2 149.4
3470 Developer Transition Kit
Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.00GHz x 2 131.3
3467 empty empty
Dual-Core AMD Opteron™ Processor 2218 x 4 250.7 <<<<<< i left this one for comparision only, running Windows XP
3466 Power Mac G5 (Late 2005)
PowerPC G5 (970) x 4 284.5
3465 MacBook
Genuine Intel® CPU T2500 @ 2.00GHz x 2 150.9
3464 Developer Transition Kit
Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.20GHz x 1 159.4

Interesting things to note:

Test on Windows vs Test on OSX. Windows was about 10% high (203 vs 181) So results you see for windows machines cannot really be held in point for point.

HTT seems to make no difference to test.
Making a dual core run on one core has a drop in speed, but not close to 50%.

MacPros make me cry.

My macbook 1.83 with 2 gig of ram got a 173. Is that good?

Wow. Mac Pro demolishes everything.

I agree with the addition of GeekBench to our multitude of benchmarking programs. Although, since synthetic benchmarking is oft criticized for accuracy and thus fairly taboo, I think listing scores from as many utilities as possible is necessary to get the best overview of a machine's performance.

That being said, I was more than happy with my 155.4 in GeekBench, but I've also included marks for all benchmarking software I currently run in my signature.

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=4350

Overall Score: 138.7

not too shabby for a...

Asrock P4Dual-915GL Socket 478 Motherboard
Pentium 4 @ 3.0 GHz Northwood

Hi I got http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7473

Is that ok?

My new result are 266.8

now really it feels better...

Mine 187.5

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7507

If I said mine was 92.1 would you make fun of me?

I'm getting 193.2
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7531

and with Rosetta 127.6
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7532

not bad i guess

if you ask me my laptop sucks a$$

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7548

My macbook Pro 17"

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7733



179

lol look this
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7717
for sure not mine
mine are about 110
does it matter that my geforce is not QE enabled etc?
the tests are about the cpu only or the gpu also?
cause if it matters im sure it will be double than this and i must feel ok

my scores while running firefox, photoshop, azureus, itunes:
140.4
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7758
w/ rosetta: 90.6
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7759

Yeah, it's time to move on from Xbench. It's the most BS benchmarking suite EVER. Especially the graphics part of it, my G4 benches the same with 5200 and 9800pro; that's just laughable. XBench has taken a LOT of flack, I was very surprised to find people here still using it.

My MBP 2.0ghz got a 179.5, which I'm pretty impressed with all things considered.

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=7765

I saw someone else on here got a 179.9 from their MBP 2.16 ghz and my score's not too far behind that.

What's really rocking my mind is those insane Mac Pro scores, and the scores some of you are getting with your mac hacks.

hmm... my macbook 1.83 (2gb ram) gets 162 / 101, which is slower than asap's 173.

interesting.. wonder if he has better RAM?

Overall Score: 133.1


not to bad I suppose

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=8200

Here's Mine. Nothing special.

First test = http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=8202 ( 132.6 )

Rosetta test = http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=8203 ( 83.8 )

i overclocked my cpu from 2.8 to 3.3 and now i get geekbench 216.7...

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9027

so i think i'm running ok.

i have:
Pentium D820 2.8Ghz oc to 3.3Ghz
Seagate 250Gb SATA II
1Gb 533Mhz Kingston RAM DDR2
ASUS P5LD2-VM SE

Processor: Intel® Pentium® D CPU 3.00GHz
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 15 Model 6 Stepping 2
Logical Processor Count: 2
Physical Processor Count: 2
Processor Frequency: 3990 MHz
Bus Frequency: 960 MHz
Memory: 1024 MB


Geekbench:Overall Score: 253.8

I will post my results once the Mac Pro gets here

^do you have a date for that, btw?

mac mini: http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9216 (128)
PC: http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9217 (142.7)

Best. Geekbench. Ever.
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9314

Not yet, but it will be here today

Okay I ran the 64bit test http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9376

Overall Score: 320.9

Congrats, Well deserved.

360.8, on 10.4.6 so you know I'm not incorrectly setting the FSB flag.

It's a Conroe E6400 at 3.9ghz

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9406

I get 301.0 @ 3.01 Ghz

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9407



EDIT:

I get 338.2 @ 3.29 Ghz

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9409

I'm the developer behind Geekbench, and I'm glad you guys find it useful! I must say it's been interesting seeing the results from both Hackintoshes and Macintoshes.

Anyway, here are my Geekbench scores for my iMac Core 2 Duo:

Mac OS X 32-bit: 206.7
Mac OS X 64-bit: 220.7

Great , I would be more interested in seeing the true results for ppls rigs.without overclocking.

Stock

Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86 Ghz
Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3
2GB Corsair XMS2 667 Mhz RAM @ 4-4-4-12
X1800XT
250GB SATAII HDD

I get 220.0:

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9427

Overclocked

Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 3.29 GHz
2GB Corsair XMS2 @ 940 Mhz Mhz RAM @ 5-5-5-15

I get 338.2:

http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9409



P.S. This is with the 32-bit version.

I've got a similar configuration under Windows (with an Intel DQ965GF motherboard and 1GB OCZ DDR2-667 4-4-4-12) and I get a score of 220.2 in 32-bit mode and a score of 253.2 in 64-bit mode.

I'm amused the 32-bit scores are so close!

Yeah - When @ 3.01 Ghz, 32-bit gives me 301, and 64-bit gives me 330. It seems both our results have an approximate difference of around 30 points...

Rosetta: 110
Native: 165



Running 10.4.8 with 10.4.8 kernel(mifki).

P4 3Ghz SSE3/HTT
1GB 400Mhz DDR SDRAM
200GB HDD(Seagate I think)
GeForce 7900GS 256MB

damn.. thought my 188 was good.. haha
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=9479

anyway, good find guys!

My MacInDell Geek Bench

Tsk Tsk.. can't get the 64 bit to run!

" Last login: Wed Dec 6 07:32:30 on ttyp1
/Users/kohbenedict/Desktop/Geekbench\ 2006-1/geekbench; exit
Welcome to Darwin!
MacInDell:~ kohbenedict$ /Users/kohbenedict/Desktop/Geekbench\ 2006-1/geekbench; exit
Bus error
logout
[Process completed]

"

Wonder if its related to my System Profiler issue where hardware cannot be detected?

MBP 15inch 2.33GHz C2D, 2 GB RAM:

Rosetta: 160.0
32-Bit: 218.7
64-Bit: 236.9

Each of these was run with Firefox, Thunderbird, Skype and iChat running. Seems pretty damn good to me; the Rosetta score seems kinda low.

My Opty 165@2.25
Overall Score: 184.8


Why the 64bit doesn't run?

Overall Score: 175.7

My result:
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=11300

Pentium D 820 2.8 GHZ/1GB RAM/ 200gb HardDrive/7300 GS 128 mb.

I wouldn't - I got 40.3

379.6 geekbench 64-bit

On the same hardware -

Results in Windows (XP SP2 - Score 155)
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=12106

Results in Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1 - Score 161):
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=12098

Results in Linux (Ubuntu 6.06.1 - Score 182):
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=12103

{Puts on asbestos suit}
Let the flaming begin!

New machine:

Setup: Asus P5LD2-VM mobo, Core2Duo T6600@2.4ghz (stock), 2 1gb sticks of ddr2 pc5300 ram. All air cooled and pretty much stock, running latest semthex beta sse3 kernel.

Geekbench 64bit - 265.7
Click to view attachment

Geekbench 32 bit - 245.1
Click to view attachment

Geekbench Rosetta - 173.3
Click to view attachment

Not to bad i'd say.
i can overclock it also but, its not my computer.....its for my boss

Mine is 89.1 !!!!
Well I guess it's not that bad for a 6 year old computer. I will build a new computer in the summer when I have time. )after I finish school)


http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=15667

Specs in sig.

Geekbench64: 310.9 Click to view attachment
Geekbench32: 288.1 Click to view attachment
GeekbenchRosetta: 208.4 Click to view attachment

Pretty satisfied.

Platform: Mac OS X x86 (32-bit)
Compiler: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363)
Operating System: Mac OS X 10.4.9 (Build 8P2137)
Model: Hackintosh
Motherboard: ADP2,1
Processor: Intel® Core™2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 2
Logical Processors: 2
Physical Processors: 1
Processor Frequency: 2.39 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache: 32.0 KB
L2 Cache: 2.00 MB
L3 Cache: 0.00 B
Bus Frequency: 800 MHz
Memory: 2.00 GB
Memory Type: 533 MHz RAM
SIMD: 1

Integer (Score: 2834)
Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 1949, 1.0, 85.6 MB/sec
Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 4105, 2.0, 168.2 MB/sec
Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 1888, 1.0, 6.04 MB/sec
Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 3549, 1.9, 11.6 MB/sec
Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1864, 1.0, 7.66 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 3801, 2.0, 15.1 MB/sec
Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 1553, 1.0, 12.8 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 3014, 2.0, 25.4 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1320, 1.0, 22.2 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 2609, 1.9, 42.6 Mpixels/sec
Crafty Chess single-threaded scalar -- 1941, 1.0, 981.1 Knodes/sec
Crafty Chess multi-threaded scalar -- 3484, 1.7, 1.69 Mnodes/sec
Lua single-threaded scalar -- 2918, 1.0, 1.12 Mnodes/sec
Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 5689, 1.9, 2.19 Mnodes/sec

Floating Point (Score: 4538)
Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 1693, 1.0, 1.13 Gflops
Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 3406, 2.0, 2.23 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 2900, 1.0, 1.40 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 5764, 1.9, 2.63 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 2014, 1.7, 2.41 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 4150, 3.1, 4.32 Gflops
LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 704, 1.0, 626.7 Mflops
LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 1407, 2.0, 1.23 Gflops
Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 3358, 1.0, 501.6 Mflops
Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 5151, 1.9, 956.1 Mflops
Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 4928, 1.0, 11.5 Mpixels/sec
Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 9622, 1.9, 22.2 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 6212, 1.0, 4.92 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 12223, 2.0, 9.61 Mpixels/sec

Memory (Score: 2751)
Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 3783, 1.0, 4.63 GB/sec
Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 2921, 1.0, 2.00 GB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 2335, 1.0, 8.72 Mallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 2160, 1.0, 4.47 GB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 2556, 1.0, 2.63 GB/sec

Stream (Score: 2004)
Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 2057, 1.0, 2.81 GB/sec
Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 2242, 1.0, 2.91 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 2125, 1.0, 2.76 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 2100, 1.0, 2.83 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 1717, 1.0, 2.59 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 2297, 1.2, 3.20 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 1833, 1.0, 2.53 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 1668, 1.2, 3.12 GB/sec