fishyeah
Nov 13 2008, 12:01 PM
I have a budget of around £1000 from work to buy a laptop. Some of the work I do will have to be done in Windows environment due to the MS Word macros we use.
The question is: should I go with the latest 13.3" Macbook (Aluminium) with Windows XP installed through boot camp or as a virtual machine via Parallel/Vmware, or go with a business laptop like Dell Latitude E6400, Lenovo Thinkpad T400 or Toshiba M10-10I (and play with Mac OS X on it)?
Korrupted
Nov 13 2008, 12:06 PM
If this is for a professional environment, go with the real Mac. Plus, Hackbooks tend to have one issue or another.
hecker
Nov 13 2008, 12:09 PM
I would say go with the MacBook. I have been using a white MacBook to develop VBA applications for Office using Windows XP with Parallels for over a year now and have never had a problem with it.
Do take into consideration that the Aluminum version of the MacBook DOES NOT have a firewire port and is much more expensive than the white/black versions. It does look damn slick, though.
Happy buying!
Synaesthesia
Nov 13 2008, 03:25 PM
Macbook.
Bluprint101
Nov 14 2008, 05:26 AM
if you can come out unscaled with a macbook pro, you should definitely go for it
or you could just wait till Apple refreshes their line early next year and see if the new macbook come with a firewire port
but 4 what its worth go 4 a mac
Synaesthesia
Nov 14 2008, 06:13 AM
Apple won't refresh their laptops early next year, they just refreshed them now.
dies
Nov 14 2008, 06:56 AM
Being a work laptop I would probably go for the Dell, unless Macs are really common where you work.
Yeah, I know that's pretty

up to say. But as far as bang for the buck goes it's pretty hard to beat, and the insane battery life with a 9 cell and extra slice would really seal the deal for a work laptop at least for me.
Synaesthesia
Nov 14 2008, 07:27 AM
Mac advantages :
Good battery life.
Good resale value. (this is a biggie)
Works perfectly with OS X + Windows.
Nice design, thin and light.
Disadvantages:
Little bit more pricey.
FavleX
Nov 14 2008, 07:54 AM
MacBook of course
I got few hacks , but I use often the macbook of my girlfriend

with bootcamp inside.
It's a pleasure running/working/playing with it.
Last personal real mac I owned was last powerbook 15.4.
They are pretty pieces of hware , no doubt...asap I collect the cash I buy one new , even if the prices as a bit high
macita
Nov 14 2008, 09:30 AM
I just update my signature.... is my first real mac.....
MACBOOK is another planet.....BUT!!
Do you will really work with macros? Office2008 for mac wont solve it? compatibility probs? so buy a cheap 2nd hand laptop...
hecker
Nov 14 2008, 09:40 AM
QUOTE(macita @ Nov 14 2008, 10:30 AM)

I just update my signature.... is my first real mac.....
MACBOOK is another planet.....BUT!!
Do you will really work with macros? Office2008 for mac wont solve it? compatibility probs? so buy a cheap 2nd hand laptop...
As stated above, Parallels works great with any Office version.
fishyeah
Nov 14 2008, 12:26 PM
Thanks a lot for all your advice. I've been running Mac OS X on my desktop PC at home. The laptop will be mainly for work, although some at my workplace use linux and Mac, we cannot do without Windows (VBA macros for our Word templates won't work on Mac version of MS Office). The solution has been vmware server (free for linux/windows) and parallels (for Mac).
I'll mainly use the laptop when traveling and meeting, so need a laptop that is small/light and sturdy. There may be some interoperability issues in a windows dominated (business) world (in which I'm working).
I also suspects that performance may suffer when running windows application via vmware/parallels on the same hard drive (bare in mind that laptop hard drive is already slow e.g. 5400rpm - which is often the bottleneck of performance). This has not been an issue for my hack (Pentium D820 3.0GHz - everything works, but I do have to find a hacked kernel everytime a major update arrives).
Korrupted
Nov 14 2008, 04:58 PM
If the slow RPMs bother you, you could always[I assume anyway, the lastgen Macbooks were upgrade friendly, why change now?] swap out the hard drive for a bigger, faster one.
Synaesthesia
Nov 14 2008, 10:24 PM
The thing is, a Mac runs Windows perfectly. Boot camp is really fast - it's a 2.4ghz Core 2 Duo or whatever - Really fast CPU.
And VMWare fusion runs Windows AMAZINGLY fast on my Pentium 4, so the Macbook should blaze through it.
And the Macbook is small, light and sturdy. For the budget of 1000 pounds it's perfect.
fishyeah
Nov 17 2008, 02:49 PM
Does the new macbook really worth the extra £300 compared with the black/white one?
Trav1s
Nov 18 2008, 01:31 AM
Well... I just picked up the new Al MB last Friday to replace my 1.33 iBook. These are things I noticed:
- graphics are much improved, especially if you use external monitors
- graphic processor removes load from the CPU
- DDR3 memory and dedicated graphics processor helps the 2.0ghz models perform better than the 2.4ghz of the previous generation.
- The Al model looks much more professional
- The Al model feels solid... no worries about cracked cases.
- Slightly lighter weight.
And they look sexy!
fishyeah
Nov 19 2008, 04:19 PM
Just received my Macbook (2.0GHz Aluminum). I love it!!!
Michu Neo
Nov 19 2008, 04:56 PM
QUOTE(fishyeah @ Nov 19 2008, 05:19 PM)

Just received my Macbook (2.0GHz Aluminum). I love it!!!
I knew you gonna love it

Good luck and take care of your new baby
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.