Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Gay 'marriage' for Anglican priests
InsanelyMac Forum > Discuss and Learn > The Big Issues [Real Life]
Alessandro17
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/7587156



QUOTE
The first gay "marriage" has been carried out in an Anglican church between two priests, it has emerged.

The Rev Peter Cowell and the Rev Dr David Lord exchanged vows at St Bartholomew the Great in the City of London last month.

Although some clergy have carried out blessings for civil ceremonies before, this is the first time the traditional wedding marriage service has been held for a same sex couple.

The Sunday Telegraph quoted the Archbishop of Uganda, the Most Rev Henry Orombi, as saying: "The leadership tried to deny that this would happen, but now the truth is out. Our respect for the Church of England will erode unless we see a return to traditional teaching."

The news will renew bitter debate among Anglicans over the issues of gay priests and homosexual marriage.

Under Church of England guidance, gay clergy can enter a civil partnership if they provide reassurance that they will abstain from sex.

Couples who ask a priest to bless their union must be dealt with "pastorally and sensitively" on an individual basis.

Anglican Bishops hold widely varying views on sexuality and the Church leaders have struggled to find middle ground. The Church was divided by the appointment of its first openly gay Bishop, Gene Robinson, in 2003.

He exchanged vows with his long-term partner Mark Andrew, in a civil ceremony in America earlier this month.

Mr Robinson has been excluded from the forthcoming Lambeth Conference, a key church gathering which is held once every 10 years and will take place in Canterbury next month. Sexuality is one of the topics up for discussion.

Copyright © Press Association Ltd. 2008, All Rights Reserved.
Embio
who the hell cares? its not up to anyone else but them
Alessandro17
QUOTE(Embio @ Jun 15 2008, 02:53 PM) *
who the hell cares? its not up to anyone else but them


A lot of people in the Anglican Church will care.

Besides it is something you don't hear every day. That is why I posted it.
Embio
my point was they shouldn't
Alessandro17
QUOTE(Embio @ Jun 15 2008, 03:07 PM) *
my point was they shouldn't


In an ideal world, yes.
Embio
well, thats that one sorted then biggrin.gif

"Under Church of England guidance, gay clergy can enter a civil partnership if they provide reassurance that they will abstain from sex."

.....what?
Numberzz
California is still waiting for people to vote on gay marriage... tongue.gif
Alessandro17
QUOTE(Embio @ Jun 15 2008, 03:13 PM) *
"Under Church of England guidance, gay clergy can enter a civil partnership if they provide reassurance that they will abstain from sex."

.....what?



Yes, that is a (bad) joke.
Paranoid Marvin
I can't decide if this is good or bad unsure.gif

I don't like the idea of gay marriage, but then I don't believe in marriage in general. But many people do, and no one should have any restrictions in forming a bond with someone they love.
Embio
can I ask what you don't like about gay marriage Marvin? I understand your stance on marriage, what changes after the wedding day? nothing!
Paranoid Marvin
QUOTE(Embio @ Jun 15 2008, 05:37 PM) *
can I ask what you don't like about gay marriage Marvin? I understand your stance on marriage, what changes after the wedding day? nothing!


Perhaps it's just because I watched the Sex and the City movie last night tongue.gif

I don't like how marriage is tied to religion, as far as I am concerned, a civil partnership is fine for me. I won't be out on the streets protesting any time soon rolleyes.gif
aduffbrew
To quote the measured and kindly response of a M. R. Winters on the Speaking of Faith web blog:

QUOTE
Gay marriage is the next phase of liberalization of culture - it is a next step of belief from the idea that former slaves are human beings, that women are able to think and vote and be in charge of their own reproductive choices. It is also the liberalization of culture that has said that children are people and not property (thus should be protected by the state if parents are abusive). Looking at the gay marriage issue in a historical context of more personal responsibility may be beneficial.

It's not about promoting, endorsing, or condoning. It's about allowing others the same freedoms we ourselves enjoy. Look at the mess caused in places where diversity of thought and belief are strictly controlled. I don't know about you, but seeing others who believe and behave differently from me helps me better understand why I make the choices I do. It's pretty damn hard to be a good Christian (or whatever tradition you embrace) if that's the only choice you have! It makes the whole process mute.

So please try to expand your minds and grow up. The extension of marriage rights is not the apocalypse. Letting others pursue their life, liberty and happiness how they choose only adds value to our own choices. Deny them that and you only deny yourself.
Embio
aduffbrew, please tell me that is a piece of sattire otherwise I need to go hide in a cupboard and avoid human contact
djet
Embio please tell me that those words are from a mindless lunatic because they make no sense.... =D

Please explain why that is satire.....
Embio
It could be satire, its kind of the last thing I'm clinging to....

If not then.... wow. Evolution should pull its finger out and get to work
djet
Please refrain from Ad Hominem (I know it wasn't directed at me.)

I think everything he said was good. Free thought? Liberty? Equal Rights?

Sounds fine to me.
Embio
oh I'm sorry!! nono you've got me wrong...

I was referring to the quote:

"Gay marriage is the next phase of liberalization of culture - it is a next step of belief from the idea that former slaves are human beings, that women are able to think and vote and be in charge of their own reproductive choices. It is also the liberalization of culture that has said that children are people and not property (thus should be protected by the state if parents are abusive). Looking at the gay marriage issue in a historical context of more personal responsibility may be beneficial."

not what aduffbrew said about it.
aduffbrew
QUOTE(Embio @ Jun 16 2008, 07:30 AM) *
It could be satire, its kind of the last thing I'm clinging to....

Why?


This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.