Oh, if it replays, it doesn't exist right? Since the global warming cult hype started after the global cooling cult hype, they are now taking penguins out of videos of Antarctica footage, and claiming it is at the north poll. I've noticed that most of these global warming cultists haven't watched March of the Penguins.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may20...508Penguins.htm

So...
Let me get this straight.

An American news station (who, let's face it, tend to make stupid mistakes) messes up a video story by mixing in random clips of artic/antartic environments, thus, proving global warming wrong?

This story is about a British Teenager going to the North Pole, (which she did, by they way), and how she wants to show the world what she has seen.
To be frank, I'm not surprised an American news network made this stupid mistake. It shows us one thing for sure, the media cannot be trusted for anything remotely scientific - but didn't we know that already?

It's amazing though how you have 2 and 2 together and get 17. Just because the media makes a stupid mistake, doesn't mean global warming is a lie, nor can I see what this has to do with George Orwell...


There's a reason why I read scientific journals rather than watching the news...

NBC segment editors made a mistake when trying to add more filler, big deal. What does this have to do with Orwell though?

Scientific Journal? So you just take the Rockefeller Foundation's word for everything? Rockefeller owns the majority of fake science "Scientific Journals" out there. There are two types of science, science, and fake science. Global warming is fake science. So is global cooling. Science states, that seasons change, the earth turns, and the sun heats up, and gets colder. The earth moves, and so does the sun. Always has, and always will. Nothing you can do about it. Al Gore's cult taxes won't fix it. Neither will street cameras, and neither will anything you, or the rich do.

I think it is so funny, the majority of rediculous {censored} that comes out of the global warming cultists. Like those stupid pictures of the polar bears on ice caps hunting for food, while the retards claim that the arctic is melting. If that was true, then NY would have been under water 20 years ago. They never mention Antarctica... which melts hundreds of miles of ice every summer, then gains it back during the winter there.

Its just like the magicians trick. They don't mention mars' ice caps, or the other planet's, anymore than the government mentions building 7 on 9/11. The idiot indictrinated public believes everything they say without questioning it.

Thats the difference between me, and you. You don't question anything. You just believe it, because you stand for nothing but yourself.

Not enough is know about Mars' climate to consider it evidence yet.
We only have climate records for mars for about 30 years, where on earth we have it for 100,000s of years.

JohnTheSavage, I suggest you actually do some real investigation into global warming, because obviously you haven't if you think plants emit carbon monoxide...

Plants inhale CO2 and emit oxogyn you oxy-moron. Al Gore's tax, is a tax on your air bone head.

But no, thats OK, you go and be a nice little slave, and submit to the big government man in uniform.
YOU WANT TO QUESTION AL GORE BOY?? Get down on your knees and lick my boots boy! Lick em! They ain't
clean enough boy. You missed some grit! You do good for ur masta Mr Rockefeller when you lick'em boots!

For someone who worships science, you sure are retarded.

I did not say plants emit carbon monoxide

JonTheSavage, I find it amazing that you continue to troll these forums with your outright rubbish

You come on here and personally insult everyone that disagrees with you. Everyone that disagrees with you is an elitist, hates freedom and is stupid (or any other idiotic insults you come out with).
I would like to make it clear at this point:
What you are saying is your **opinion**.
Because you believe it does not make it right, especially in 99% of your posts, where you fail to give any reliable sources. The wild assumptions you make do not give you right to make wild accusations at the people of this forum.

At this point in time, you have failed to show any comprehension of science (most specifically chemistry and geography) beyond that of an 11 year old.

Call me an idiot if you want, but if you can't accept that a 17 year old has a better understanding of science than you (and I am sure you have allowed to me to more than prove that fact) perhaps you should find somewhere else to post your rubbish.

When it comes to the environment, there is no conspiracy going on. Liberals are a lot more simple than you think. Al Gore just REALLY cares about the environment and he feels like its in danger. He is so passionate about it that he will do anything to help it (whether that includes making government bigger or not), and since its the environment, most people don't want to stop him, and why should they.

Even if the environment isn't as damaged by people as we think, we should still do everything in our power to have as little impact as possible, the Earth is a life, it sustains us. It lasts a lot longer if we don't gorge ourselves of its flesh and instead take tiny nibbles that can be repaired. This will ensure that future generations of people can live here. Screw anybody who doesn't care about the environment, all of them are simply out of touch with what it means to be a human being on this planet. These people who DON'T care need a reality check, they need to be shown what its like to actually be a living thing in an environment. Even talking about this issue in this way is idiocy.

That's an excellent point that very few people grasp.
If you analyse any seral community (bar a climatic climax community) you will find they are changing their environment to a point where it kills them, then allowing the next progression for a more advanced seral community . The same occurs with us. Although we rather egotistically call the environments we create plagioclimaxes, they are no different from what lichens, and, all the way up to grasses do - we are changing our environment to the point where it is killing us.

Exactly!

What many people don't understand is that Environmentalism isn't really about the environment for human beings, it would be nice if we could respect the environment and treat it as family. However most human beings are incapable of this, so here's a point that most people CAN grasp. Environmentalism is about US. It is about HUMAN BEINGS having a place to live. It is about HUMAN BEINGS surviving past this generation. It is about HUMAN BEINGS being able to sustain ourselves and continue to evolve, grow, progress socially. If we do not maintain the environment, we may very well survive, but our advanced civilization will be a distant memory, faded. We will literally go backwards in time technologically (and I would argue socially) if we cannot move toward a cleaner future for all of us.

Climate fluctuations are a fact of life here on Earth. In fact, we have been benefiting from an unusually long period of climate stability. It is my personal opinion that the media, in their efforts to sensationalize, are doing more to discredit the various global warming theories than the critics themselves. This is unfortunate. In our efforts to be heard, emotionalism and irrationality creep into the discussion. Regardless of what side of the debate you're on, it is too easy to take one small part of the discussion and use it to discredit the entire argument.

The truth of the matter is Earth has always experienced climate change and most of those changes were on scales that boggle the mind. We have the paleoclimate evidence of such things. Such changes are not relegated to some distance past either. Check out such topics like the "medieval climate optimum" and the period that followed. "The Little Ice Age" puts those immortal words, "Let them eat cake!" in a whole new light. It's been happening throughout human history and it's happening now.

Because climate change has happened before does that mean we aren't exacerbating the process now? Of course not! Like many today, I personally think we are making a tremendous impact. That impact will be costly for some... but not all. The current climate models clearly show there will be winners and losers. But even small changes can have big affects. Look at what is happening today with the price of grains!

All that said, whether we believe in global warming or not, we can all agree the use of hydrocarbon compounds is poisoning our environment. In the oceans to our own back yards, we are witnessing the negative effects this has on the ecology all around us.... and unfortunately human health is not immune. Much of what the "climate hippies" are proposing.. ie, cleaner renewable energy, conservation, stricter environmental protectionism... will have wide ranging positive effects. If implemented correctly, with minimal hype, they can also come with tremendous economic benefit.

Why don't you try and prove me wrong, and give me some reliable sources other than the opinion of some billionaire? You are such a {censored} hypocrite.

You have never proven me wrong. So who is right?

You have never proved anything you post. I've pointed out all of your flaws, and the people that back your cultish wierdo theories. You have never given me one example where banning guns didn't make things worse. You just give your extremist left wing opinion without providing proof.

You tout your darwin bullshit, yet you haven't proved anything, and cannot prove anything. You can just parrot someone else's opinion. You can't through FACT tell me how the first cell was formed you {censored} little hypocrite. PROVE IT. Tell me how it was formed.

You have not proved global warming. You just parrot that of what your TV tells you. Your quotes are exactly what comes from your boob tube. You haven't given me an explanation why NASA's reports claim that Mar's ice caps are melting, along with several of the planet's moons. You just yell and scream like the gutless little yuppie that you are.

I can give you 1.54 gigs worth of unclassified documents from the DOD, ADMITTING that they design the programming on your TV to BRAINWASH you, and program you to believe the stupid baseless crap that you come up with. Do you want me to post all 1.54 gigs? Go look it up, its on http://www.linuxgod.net/dod/. Do your own research. Thats the problem with your lazy ass generation. You just want people to give you {censored}, you don't want to do any work, you just want to sit on your fat bum ass, and be entertained. So guess what? I just provided you with all 1.54 gigs because you are too fat and lazy to look it up yourself. If your opinion doesn't change after you read all 1.54 gigs, then you can go {censored} yourself. Your posts will be meaningless from here on out, and I will dismiss you as a lazy bum from this point on.

So prove me wronge you gutless, yellow liberal. I just gave you ALL OF the documents for 1/2 of my posts.

PROVE ME WRONG! DO IT. DO IT NOW.
And don't come back on this board untill you have read all 1.54 gigs.
So now. Get off your damned bean bag and get to reading.

When you have a comprehension of chemistry and atmospherical geography beyond that of a 9 year old, then maybe your post could be taken with some consideration.

And I have stated several times that Mars' ice caps are sublimating - carbon dioxide ice does not melt under those physical conditions. If you understood basic chemistry, you would know that - just look up any databook.

Get back to reading slave, you haven't finished yet.

No one is going to have a serious discussion with you because all you do is throw insults.

You're an idiot, shut up moron etc...

If you actually knew something about biochemistry and atmospheric science, you might have some people talking to you but since you still believe that plants emit carbon monoxide and that burning hydrocarbons doesn't release carbon dioxide, no one will take you seriously.

Here's the only personal insult you will ever see me post here, because there is no place for it in debate or discussion.

{censored} off.

ahahahah you called someone an oxymoron... and a slave


you are such a fool

Oh yeah, IM the idiot, turn your head and stick it in the sand. I just proved you all wrong, so your response is only natural for a brainless yellow yuppie. It is to be expected from a little cultish kid.I find it hard to believe you read 1.54 gigs worth of anything in under 2 weeks.And to think you have the audacity to respond.Yeah... haha. Learn to read. There are at least 3 weeks worth for you above. Get to reading punk.

I don't think that's the problem people are contemplating. Why the hell would we read 1.54GBs of text, presumably, just to argue with you? That's not us trying to not argue, that's you.

Actually if you were to read my other posts in the other useless threads that you post, you would see that I disprove every single point you make about CO2, CO and Hydrocarbons. Go take a look.