Hi David86,
Your not at all being rude, frankly I really appreciate your honesty. Yes your right PCI alone does suck, but that is all my motherboard supports (except onboard Intel GMA950), and the 8500GT was the most powerful PCI only graphics card available on the market

But I thought the specs would at least be good enough to run Unreal Tournament
2K4 my card & specs are listed here:
http://www.sparkle.com.tw/product_detail.a...&sub_id=160Personally speaking, I think they should be more than enough for the job (EDIT - evidently not

).
Model number : SF-PC85GT256U2 Passive
Graphics Processing : NVIDIA GeForce 8500GT
Core Clock : 450 MHz
Memory Type : 256MB DDR2
Memory Interface : 128-Bit
Shader Clock : 900 MHz
Bus Type : PCI
RAMDAC : 400 MHz
They card is also only supposed to a bit slower than the 8600 but not crushingly slower. The graphics card specs required for Call of Duty 2 are: • Supported Video cards: NVIDIA GeForce 5200, 6600, 6800, 7800 ATI Radeon 9600, 9650, 9700, 9800, X600, X800, X850 (Universal Binary Version). Surely the 8500GT can beat an old Radeon 9600??? Right?...
What I cant wrap my head around is why would Sparkle release a PCI graphics card that cant even come close to it's alternative interfaces i.e. AGP/PCI-e in terms of performance (it aint really a 8500GT then is it). I mean what would be the point of releasing the 8500GT why not just stop at the GeForce 3 series for PCI? Or even just chuck a 8800GTX on the circuit board if it aint gonna make any difference if the bottle neck is just the PCI interface??? I mean some idiot, like me, would still buy it thinking "WOW I gotta PCI 8800GTX!".
Again, I must thank you for your reply nonetheless. Your a legend mate

And your right, I can return it but I thinking that if this is the best/highest spec card available on PCI then I may as well keep it, as the others can only be worse right?...