mumford Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 So Apple is pulling the same dirty tricks that Monopolysoft has been doing, but the fanbois here are defending Apple. Did I miss anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLiDE FTW!!1 Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 ^^ Last 2 comments ... lol... doesn't really make sense to you either, huh? That's funny, all the educated people here seemed to understand our point just fine. Weird.Well I'd rather have an Apple blue face, than a microsoft brown nose like you Yep, gotta love the taskbar in my sig -- I made it in MS-Paint. Are you really that simple minded to believe that someone who is opposing something (or multiple things) Apple is automatically pro-Microsoft? How old are you? 12? @ A Nonny Moose: 'If the program works for A and B, but since it doesn't work well for C, means that there's something wrong with the program -- obviously not C' -- isn't really a level-headed way of looking at it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxintosh Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 So Apple is pulling the same dirty tricks that Monopolysoft has been doing Try proving it with facts next time. Are you really that simple minded to believe that someone who is opposing something Apple is automatically pro-Microsoft? You have a history of being anti-Apple and pro-microsoft. I think that makes a slight difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impulsion Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Solution!!! stop complaining and find something new to use! being a windows native i had to start all over again and find new programs to use to replace the old favorites that i used in windows! granted i wish the new one's would run a bit faster in osx but that's what constant updates are for right? deal with it and move on! complaining about it here isn't gonna get you anywhere, complain to either mozilla or apple about it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLiDE FTW!!1 Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 You have a history of being anti-Apple and pro-microsoft Try proving it with facts next time. Fail. Solution!!! stop complaining and find something new to use! being a windows native i had to start all over again and find new programs to use to replace the old favorites that i used in windows! granted i wish the new one's would run a bit faster in osx but that's what constant updates are for right? deal with it and move on! complaining about it here isn't gonna get you anywhere, complain to either mozilla or apple about it! Problem!!! complaining to apple about it won't accomplish anything (they're sticking it to 3rd party developers) and mozilla errr-- firefox team is complaining about these API's!!! read through the thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impulsion Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Fail. Problem!!! complaining to apple about it won't accomplish anything (they're sticking it to 3rd party developers) and mozilla errr-- firefox team is complaining about these API's!!! read through the thread! then i guess there's nothin to do other than deal with it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxintosh Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Fail. Great, next week we'll see if you can handle 5 letter words :censored2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 I noticed IE loads faster than FireFox on Windows... Guess I'll {censored} about that then. Seriously, you guys are pathetic. There are few posts in this thread that are even intelligent. Maybe if you realized that Safari uses full Cocoa API's and Firefox DOESN'T, you would understand why it's slower. Camino is also faster than Firefox on hard/soft loads because of this reason. Start doing you're homework, or I am going to send you all to your room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schwartz Posted March 9, 2008 Share Posted March 9, 2008 remember when microsoft slowed down all web browsers on its microsoft.com page? (besides internet explorer of course!). looks like apple is more like microsoft then we thot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riws Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 Its KHTML vs Gecko, so whats the problem, KHTML renders faster, simple. Try Shiira and you will see it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Software Updater Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Your post had no point... you just defend Apple until your face turns blue. All you said was: Firefox would do the same if it had an OS. Firefox is open source -- and open source developers make Linux... which doesn't have hidden API's to make certain programs run faster. Can you contribute to the topic at least? Or does Apple pay you to say generic comments that compliment them? You just contradicted yourself, you said his post had no point yet you said he can defend apple until his face turns blue. So his post had a point, to defend Apple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forceman Posted March 13, 2008 Author Share Posted March 13, 2008 Just tried Beta4 and it's ALOT smoother and just way better, it's just as smooth scrolling as Safari. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxintosh Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 You just contradicted yourself, you said his post had no point yet you said he can defend apple until his face turns blue. Do yourself a favor and don't try to sort through Killa CLiDEs psycho babble. He has a long history of making comments that only he can decode. We love him for the entertainment value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtraa Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Mac OS X Secretly Cripples Non-Apple Software, welcome to 10.4.1 deadmoo ff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Nonny Moose Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 @ A Nonny Moose: 'If the program works for A and B, but since it doesn't work well for C, means that there's something wrong with the program -- obviously not C' -- isn't really a level-headed way of looking at it... It's the logical way of looking at it, though. If A and B are working and working fast, then shouldn't the issue be to make C run fast instead of crying about how you can't code for C (regardless of the API issue)? To me, there are two solutions to this problem. Either cry about it (which the Firefox team is doing) or work to make it faster despite the issue. Crying over something only tells you certain negative things about the developer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forceman Posted March 14, 2008 Author Share Posted March 14, 2008 Firefox 3 beta4 has the workaround so thats why it's smoother, seems the API issue is real and maybe the other devs of OS X browsers just didn't talk about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Nonny Moose Posted March 15, 2008 Share Posted March 15, 2008 Firefox 3 beta4 has the workaround so thats why it's smoother, seems the API issue is real and maybe the other devs of OS X browsers just didn't talk about it. Bad developers still cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted March 15, 2008 Share Posted March 15, 2008 And FF2 still doesn't use full Cocoa API's, which is why it's slow to begin with, FF3 uses full Cocoa, and is thus faster. Once again, do your homework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts