windowsonmac Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 I started a contest to boot Windows XP on the Intel Mac. I donated $100 of my own money and encourage anyone interested in this feature to donate as much as they are willing to pay for it. The first person in with the instructions wins the whole pot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sudar Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 I started a contest to boot Windows XP on the Intel Mac. I donated $100 of my own money and encourage anyone interested in this feature to donate as much as they are willing to pay for it. The first person in with the instructions wins the whole pot! I do suppose it's better to offer those bucks directly to experienced programmer/developer who shall be able to compile GRUB2 for OSx86! http://grub.enbug.org/ It does have EVERYTHING we need to dual-boot the new Intel Macs: http://grub.enbug.org/CurrentStatus P.S. Maybe create a sepatate topic for this?.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomasology Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 I donated $50 USD. Keep uo the great research guys. Were close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 (edited) cloudscout: dont be a fool man, if you want a 20'', hold out for a 20'' !! there will always be time for tinkering Probably but adding an external 17" Samsung 740 DVI panel for about $225 would be a good choice for more pixels than the 20" iMac at a lower price. - did that, thought it ought to be descriptive. Great now what about "I DID IT"? I mean, Vista has not been booted yet, correct? I just looked at the update thread title and it clearly appears otherwise. I do not know what "- Not OSX yet" is supposed to mean either. Edited January 22, 2006 by bofors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjr162 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 I don't have access to an Intel/Mac setup right now, but I was wondering since OS X is based on (Free?)BSD couldn't you figure out what changes to the BSD Apple made, and try to make some wrapper to impliment those changes to a bootloader program before it actually launchs the XP or Vista? Sorta pull like what DOSEMU did to get DOS/Windows9X running on a linux box, but use a BIOS Image somehow to control the section that windows XP/Vista would be accessing to implement the BIOS type features? Maybe I'm way off base here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Yes, OS X is based on the BSDs (and primarily FreeBSD) but via Apple's open source OS derivative called Darwin. http://developer.apple.com/darwin/history.html The new EFI-Macs use x86 Darwin 8.4 and Apple has yet to release that soure (nor is obligated too). The BIOS x86 run Darwin 8.3 which is public now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myzar Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Look here http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...#entry587109288 Well after talking to some MS developers on the windows team, it turns out vista build 5270 does NOT have EFI enabled on it... to quote one of them "That is a known bug. EFI is not enabled yet. It doesn't look like it will be fixed for Beta 2" so this is why we can not boot it on a mac yet, it's not because mac wont support it, it is just because Microsoft hasn't enabled it yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koltz Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 (edited) Been watching the thread and lurking for the most part. I do have a MacBook Pro on order. But I just downloaded the EFI toolkit up on Intel's website. The only readme.txt I found shows that you can load EFI drivers? One is Partition.EFI which shows support for MBR/GPT/EL Torito? I will just copy/paste the readme.txt here. Intel PRO/1000 EFI Device Driver XYY in the filenames below indicates the version number of the driver. eXYYb2.efi: This is the EBC (EFI Byte Code) executable, which is capable of running on both IA32, and IA64 processor based systems. eXYYe2.efi: This version of the EFI driver is intended solely for IA32 processor based systems. The e207e2.efi driver is identical to what OEM customers will include in their EFI32 bios. eXYYi2.efi: This version of the EFI driver is intended solely for IA64 processor based systems. The e207i2.efi driver is identical to what OEM customers will include in their EFI64 bios. Prerequisites Before you can use any of the EFI drivers you must have a system with an EFI based BIOS, or an EFI boot floppy. For more information, please see the Intel EFI web page. Once you have an EFI enabled system you need to make sure the EFI Simple Network Protocol (referred to as SNP in the rest of this document) driver is loaded. This is done by typing the EFI "drivers" command. "SNP3264.efi" will be listed if the SNP driver is loaded. The job of the SNP driver is to manage connections to all of the hardware specific network drivers to the OS. Loading the EFI Network Driver Once you have an EFI enabled system with the SNP driver loaded you are ready to load the EFI Network driver. The EFI "load" command is used to load the network driver: load E206B2.efi After the load command completes a message will appear indicating whether the driver load was successful. If the load was successful, execute the "drivers" command to see whether the network driver loaded. The screen below shows a sample output from the EFI "drivers" command. Driver handle A1 in the "DRV" column shows that the E206B2.efi driver loaded successfully. T D D Y C I R P F A V VERSION E G G #D #C DRIVER NAME IMAGE NAME == ======== = = = == == =================================== =================== 18 00000010 B - - 5 38 PCI Bus Driver PciBus 19 00000010 D - - 1 - PC-AT ISA Device Enumeration Driver PcatIsaAcpi 1A 00000010 B - - 1 3 ISA Bus Driver IsaBus 1B 00000010 B - - 2 2 ISA Serial Driver IsaSerial 1C 00000000 ? - - - - BIOS[iNT10] VGA Mini Port Driver BiosVgaMiniPort 1D 00000010 ? - - - - VGA Class Driver VgaClass 1E 00000010 D - - 1 - UGA Console Driver GraphicsConsole 1F 00000010 D - - 2 - Serial Terminal Driver Terminal 20 00000010 D - - 1 - Platform Console Management Driver ConPlatform 25 00000010 B - - 1 1 Console Splitter Driver ConSplitter 2C 00000010 D - - 2 - Usb Uhci Driver UsbUhci 2D 00000010 B - - 2 3 USB Bus Driver UsbBus 2E 00000010 ? - - - - Usb Bot Mass Storage Driver UsbBot 2F 00000010 ? - - - - <UNKNOWN> UsbCbi1 30 00000010 D - - 1 - Usb Keyboard Driver UsbKeyboard 31 00000114 D - - 1 - ATI Rage XL UGA Driver PciRom Seg=00000000 60 00000010 D - - 2 - Generic Disk I/O Driver DiskIo 61 00000010 ? - - - - Partition Driver(MBR/GPT/El Torito) Partition 62 00000010 D - - 1 - FAT File System Driver Fat 64 00000030 B - - 1 1 Intel® PRO/1000 v1.20 EFI-64 GigUndi 65 00000010 D - - 1 - Simple Network Protocol Driver Snp3264 66 00000010 D - - 1 - PXE Base Code Driver PxeBc 67 00000010 D - - 1 - PXE DHCPv4 Driver PxeDhcp4 68 00000010 D - - 1 - Usb Mouse Driver UsbMouse 78 01020300 D X X 2 - LSI Logic Ultra320 SCSI Driver VenHw(6D9FEEB1-E585 A1 00002100 ? - - - - Intel® PRO/1000 v2.10 EFI-64 \/E210B2.efi The #D and #C fields indicate whether the driver successfully bound to a device and created a child handle respectively. In the screen above these field are blank indicating the E206B2.efi network driver has not bound to a device. In the above screen the driver did not bind because a previous version of the network driver was already bound to the device (handle 64 above). Remedying this problem is described in the next section. Connecting the EFI Network Driver Once the driver is loaded it needs to bind to the network adapter. If an earlier version of the driver was already loaded then the EFI "reconnect" command must be used to reconnect all drivers in the system so that the network adapter will bind to the newer version of the driver loaded in the system. The "reconnect" command is used: reconnect -r The "-r" parameter indicates that a recursive reconnect be performed. When the reconnect command completes it will report whether the reconnection was successful. The EFI "drivers" command should be used to verify whether the network adapter successfully rebound to the new driver. Unloading the EFI Network Driver To unload a network driver from memory the EFI "unload" command is used. The syntax for using the unload command is as follows: "unload [driver handle]", where driver handle is the number assigned to the driver in the far left column of the "drivers" output screen. Intel EFI Network Driver naming convention The Intel EFI drivers all follow a naming convention allowing the driver version, driver type, and the hardware supported by the driver to be determined by looking at the filename. Below is the decoder for the driver filenames: Exyytn.efi where: x is the major version number of the EFI driver in decimal yy is the minor version number of the EFI driver in decimal t is the type of driver B - EFI EBC UNDI driver only E - EFI32 specific UNDI only I - EFI64 specific UNDI only n is the general type of adapter the driver is for 1 - Fast Ethernet 2 - Gigabit 4 - 10 Gigabit 6 - TCP Offload Engine (TOE) Examples: E206B2.efi - Version 2.06 of EBC EFI driver for PRO/1000 E103I4.efi - Version 1.03 of EBC EFI driver for PRO/10GBE E001E6.efi - Version 0.01 of EFI32 driver for TOE First you have to load the Simple Network driver, then the ethernet driver, then it looks like it doesn't matter. I would try, but I don't have a EFI system and MacBook Pro's aren't shipping till February. All those drivers look to be in the Binary\IA32Drivers\BIN directory when the file is extracted. Corey Edited January 25, 2006 by koltz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanky Deluxe Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 Been watching the thread and lurking for the most part. I do have a MacBook Pro on order. But I just downloaded the EFI toolkit up on Intel's website. The only readme.txt I found shows that you can load EFI drivers? One is Partition.EFI which shows support for MBR/GPT/EL Torito? I will just copy/paste the readme.txt here. First you have to load the Simple Network driver, then the ethernet driver, then it looks like it doesn't matter. I would try, but I don't have a EFI system and MacBook Pro's aren't shipping till February. All those drivers look to be in the Binary\IA32Drivers\BIN directory when the file is extracted. Corey Woah, this certainly sounds very interesting. However, I don't think we can get to the Shell prompt on Intel iMacs yet where those commands would need to be typed in. We can get to that Intel test implementation but I don't think we can get to the shell where the commands could be typed in because as far as I know Apple never put the shell in there. I may be wrong though since I don't have an Intel mac to play around with yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathChill Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 Well, this topic name really should be changed as we're definitely not any closer to booting Vista. Anyway, aren't there any Linux distributions that can be installed directly? I mean, there's got to be some GPT Linux distros. Those would be the most interesting thing to look into first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koltz Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 When I was checking out ELILO, they have an older version compiled for IA32. I am guessing they only have Itanium box. But from what it sounds like on the sourceforge, is that should work. But I don't know how to integrate it (or what distros have it integrated) outside of Itanium. I know SUSE has a distra that uses it, but again Itanium build. As for the EFI's, isn't the shell an EFI also? Plus what I read was there should be a efi.conf file. This might be used for an autoloading of modules. So if Apple has a conf file, it might be missing besides those files/those commands to load when the EFI is loaded. Corey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robojerk Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 Well, this topic name really should be changed as we're definitely not any closer to booting Vista. Anyway, aren't there any Linux distributions that can be installed directly? I mean, there's got to be some GPT Linux distros. Those would be the most interesting thing to look into first. Red Hat has announced that they are working to get their linux distro to boot on the new intel macs. Red Hat needs to write this from the ground up consider their kernel does not include EFI support I found this information here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koltz Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 Yeah, I read that. I would expect that Red Hat should have something ready for when my MacBook Pro is shipped. And with that, GRUB2/ELILO and possibly booting XP with it. But I will be patiently watching until it ships on progress. Corey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bofors Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 Well, this topic name really should be changed as we're definitely not any closer to booting Vista. Anyway, aren't there any Linux distributions that can be installed directly? I mean, there's got to be some GPT Linux distros. Those would be the most interesting thing to look into first. My thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isaac.S Posted January 25, 2006 Share Posted January 25, 2006 Why doesn't anybody try building a version of grub 2 and use it on the mac? It can't be that hard. I have compiled and installed stuff on my laptop. I would do it but I don't have a mac I sure want a macbook though! Isaac.S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phi Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 What about Windows Server 2003? Some weeks ago I was browsing some server preferences and found in the disk management an option to convert a harddrive to gpt. Then I clicked on help to see what it is (I never heard before of GPT), and microsoft tells that this is a new "generation" of partitioning tables and is used with 64bit systems and so on. But in the moment i don't have any Windows 2003. I have to go to work and look, but i can't try to much things on this machine cause it's a "production server". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloudscout Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Unfortunately, only the Itanium versions of Windows will even read GPT partitioned disks at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isaac.S Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Ok, no excuses now. Here is the url to build grub 2 for x86 using gpt. Scroll down a bit. I would work on doing it myself but don't have a machine to do it on. Anybody want to team up with me? If you do let me know... I am in Spokane WA. Let's get a move on it! Isaac.S http://grub.enbug.org/TestingOnX86 Boot GRUB 2 via floppy on a GPT partitioned system You can boot GRUB 2 via floppy on a GPT partitioned system using following script to create a bootable floppy disk: #!/bin/bash #This will create a GRUB2 boot floppy that supports GPT system: grub-mkimage -d /boot/grub -v -o /boot/grub/core.img ls ext2 gpt pc linux _linux boot chain configfile default fshelp help mke2fs /dev/fd0 mount -o loop -t ext2 /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy/ mkdir -p /mnt/floppy/boot/grub cp /boot/grub/boot.img /boot/grub/core.img /boot/grub/*.mod /mnt/floppy/boot/grub cp -f /boot/grub/grub.cfg /mnt/floppy/boot/grub grub-mkdevicemap -m /boot/grub/device.map grub-setup -d /mnt/floppy/boot/grub -v -r '(fd0)' -m /boot/grub/device.map '(fd0)' umount /mnt/floppy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forcer Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Unrelated, I too find the topic very confusing... "I DID IT!!! (EFI Vista Boot), - Not OSX yet" is very misleading and the latter makes no sense... Perhaps rename it to something similar to what's being discussed: EFI booting? Is there a focus on just Windows or are we covering anything that can boot on the new Macs? I agree. Admins, can you please rename the thread to stop confusing people ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomasology Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 if Win xp loads onto these new Macs. I am curious if I will be able to use my firewire Audio interface that is made to be used with Win XP. (Could I use it with a Macbook Pro running Win XP?) Should there be any issues? If there will be issues, what will some of them be? Drivers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr. pink Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 i was wondering, how hard would it be to physically remove the hard drive from an intel imac? if it were possible, couldn't you plug it into a pc (with osx i guess) and repartition it, add grub etc. from there, then install windows on it. I read somewhere that apple's EFI reads FAT partitions, so you could use that in XP. After all that, could you put it back into the imac and (i'm certainly no expert on this stuff, infact i know next to nothing) configure it to boot the grub loader? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koltz Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 As for the firewire thing. All it will need is driver support. As for FAT/NTFS, it is the partition info, not the file format. That is why everybody is looking into GRUB/LILO for boot management. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomasology Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 koltz. So if the firewire interface already has driver support for Win XP. Should that driver work fine for Win XP running on a Macintel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowGuy Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 I stumbled across this link today.... http://support.ap.dell.com/support/topics/...5173&l=zh&s=lca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcoyrhs Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 Just wondering if any one has considered a slightly different approach to this situation. The main concerns with loading windows are EFI, and GPT. We know that windows does not natively support GPT, but my question is this, even though macos uses GPT by default, can it be made to work with a normally partitioned hard drive that windows would understand? If it is possible to do so, then we could stop looking in so many directions and focus on getting an EFI boot loader, and worrying about what bios compatibility options windows needs. Just my 2 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts