Jump to content

Bless Error


natoodo
 Share

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I have leopard GM installed on my computer but can only boot it with the install disk. I followed the instructions Here

 

the instruction work right up to here:

 

4) bless the partition:

sudo bless -device /dev/disk0s1 -setBoot -verbose

 

I get this error in terminal:

 

EFI found at IODeviceTree:/efi

Other partition scheme detected

No auxiliary booter partition required

Returning booter information dictionary:

<CFDictionary 0x301f30 [0xa080b1c0]>{type = mutable, count = 3, capacity = 4, pairs = (

0 : <CFString 0x1862c [0xa080b1c0]>{contents = "Auxiliary Partitions"} = <CFArray 0x301840 [0xa080b1c0]>{type = immutable, count = 0, values = (

)}

1 : <CFString 0x1863c [0xa080b1c0]>{contents = "System Partitions"} = <CFArray 0x301c70 [0xa080b1c0]>{type = immutable, count = 0, values = (

)}

3 : <CFString 0x1861c [0xa080b1c0]>{contents = "Data Partitions"} = <CFArray 0x3017c0 [0xa080b1c0]>{type = immutable, count = 1, values = (

0 : <CFString 0x301810 [0xa080b1c0]>{contents = "disk1s1"}

)}

)}

IOMedia disk1s1 does not have a partition UUID

DADiskRef disk1s1 has Volume UUID DA40006A-B6C6-3783-A59D-099826456847

IOMedia disk1s1 has path IODeviceTree:/PCI0@0/IDES@1F,2/PRID@0/@1:1

Could not find IODeviceTree:/options

 

 

 

Any help? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know, it seems like the "bless" command we need is not the

actual "bless" that comes with Mac OS.

 

I read somewhere that the actual "bless" won't write anything to disc but

will alter the real Mac's NVRAM ... while our "bless" found in BrazilMac's

guide (even comes with source code !!) .... may write something to the disc.

I am not totally sure of how it works (anyone ?) but I'm sure that we'll

need the "bless" command in BrazilMac's package, not the original one.

 

---

 

Edit : Well, I feel pretty dumb now. I've just look into the bless.c in the BrazilMac package and found that it does NOTHING at all ...

just print out what you give it as arguments !

So, I think we can safely skip it without any ill-effects. Anyone please confirm this ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...