cargoplex Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 THX 1138... oh whoops, I mean 9A687 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadsport Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 9A666. April 65th. what what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numberzz Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 well I hope it is not 9A527, even tho it is good. I'd laugh it was 9b1 xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearcat Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 well I hope it is not 9A527, even tho it is good. I'd laugh it was 9b1 xD You may have to laugh, I think you're close. Current builds are 9Axxx, and the current builds of Tiger are 8Rxxxx My guess is that, if convention holds, it will be 9R0001 or slightly higher allowing for RC candidate refreshes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrf Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 Current builds are 9Axxx, and the current builds of Tiger are 8Rxxxx My guess is that, if convention holds, it will be 9R0001 or slightly higher allowing for RC candidate refreshes. If they follow the convention, GM will be either 9AXXX or 9BXXX. Tiger Builds became four digits long, when they introduced Universal Builds. Public Beta was 1H39 (Wikipedia) 10.0 was 4K78 through 4Q12 (10.0.4) (Wikipedia) 10.1 was 5G64 through 5S60 (10.1.5) (Wikipedia) 10.2 was 6C115 through 6R73 (10.2.8) (Wikipedia) 10.3 was 7B85 through 7W98 (10.3.9) (Wikipedia) 10.4 started with 8A428, split off at 8G32 (PPC) and 8G1152 (Intel) with 10.4.4 and is now at 8R218 (PPC) and 8R2218/8R2322 (Intel) (10.4.10) (Wikipedia) 9RXXX could be 10.5.7 or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearcat Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 If they follow the convention, GM will be either 9AXXX or 9BXXX. Tiger Builds became four digits long, when they introduced Universal Builds. Public Beta was 1H39 (Wikipedia) 10.0 was 4K78 through 4Q12 (10.0.4) (Wikipedia) 10.1 was 5G64 through 5S60 (10.1.5) (Wikipedia) 10.2 was 6C115 through 6R73 (10.2.8) (Wikipedia) 10.3 was 7B85 through 7W98 (10.3.9) (Wikipedia) 10.4 started with 8A428, split off at 8G32 (PPC) and 8G1152 (Intel) with 10.4.4 and is now at 8S144 (PPC) and 8S2144 (Intel) (10.4.10) (Wikipedia) 9RXXX could be 10.5.7 or something. Interesting, I'd like to know then why my 10.4.10 says build 8R2322, it should be 8S something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrf Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 Interesting, I'd like to know then why my 10.4.10 says build 8R2322, it should be 8S something? Argh, got that wrong, sorry for the confusion. 8S something are the developer seeds for 10.4.11, 10.4.10 should be 8R218 for PPC and 8R2218 resp. 8R2322 for Intel. (got mislead by the wikipedia table) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paranoid Marvin Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 Hmmm, maybe we'll get an announcement on the 18th at the Apple Store in London? Perhaps the build will be 9A1337 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
germen Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 Maybe Apple doesn't ship Leopard in october. Because according to the roadmap there should have been a final candidate in early september. And it's already mid september.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksec Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 So may be the next option is to push it back to next MacWorld? And i can say Apple Definitely need a few dozen more talented Software Engineer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewed Apple Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 On Aprl 1st all the way if its shifted 9b <- its simple and asthetic because there are no confusing numbers following. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iLux Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 Maybe Apple doesn't ship Leopard in october. Because according to the roadmap there should have been a final candidate in early september. And it's already mid september.. Nobody has ever said the roadmap was legit It can be a pure creation, that roadmap is really not hard to imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numberzz Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 idk, i mean 527 is pretty stable at this point. i love it i could easily say that the build could be 600 or the like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R2k. Posted September 15, 2007 Share Posted September 15, 2007 15 days 11 hours 45 minutes to go . ~R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatim Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 9a843 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SquidCombo Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 I guess no one won. It's 9a581. The closes one is Paranoid Marvin, guessing 9a589 as the final build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dago Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 9a571? http://images.apple.com/server/macosx/feat...02_20071009.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
celebi23 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 9a571? http://images.apple.com/server/macosx/feat...02_20071009.jpg Thats the Server final build #. The client build # is usually different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delish Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 about the wiki numbers, my mac mini came with build 8R3014 (2ghz C2D) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts