Jump to content

Better OpenGL benchmarking, GioFX OpenMark


  • Please log in to reply
86 replies to this topic

#1
DiaboliK

DiaboliK

    DiaboliK <- Capital K!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,336 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hollyweird, CA
Alright kids,

i hate xbench's opengl and other graphics tests, cause it dependent on the monitor's resolution and refresh rate, change that and your results change!

so some people here at : GioFX , created OpenMark : OpenGl benchmarking for Mac OS X

with that said and done lets post some results.

heres my ATi x1300Pro 256 pci-e with NatitX1300(R1) and 1049 ATi kexts:
(you need to convert the .tga to something uploadable to attach here)

Attached File  X1300Pro.R1.OpenMark.result.jpg   80.43KB   159 downloads
Attached File  X1300Pro.R1.OpenMark.result.txt   2.54KB   126 downloads

i will post my other cards when im done actually using them, to pull a few benches off them.
-DiaboliK

(if this program crahses your system or locks it up, you have a problem with your OpenGL :poster_oops:)

#2
DiaboliK

DiaboliK

    DiaboliK <- Capital K!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,336 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hollyweird, CA
couple more of my cards:

XFX 7600GS fanless 256mb pci-e: natit dual v02, unedited nvidia 1049 kexts

Attached File  Diabolik.7600GS.Fanless.OpenMarkresult.jpg   86.47KB   75 downloads
Attached File  Diabolik.7600GS.Fanless.OpenMarkresult.txt   2.83KB   47 downloads

Sapphire X1600Pro 512mb pci-e: NatitX1600 (R1v3), edited atiradeonx1000.kext and 10.4.5 atindrv.kext , all other ati kexts are 1049

Attached File  Diabolik.X1600Pro.512.OpenMarkresult.jpg   80.21KB   45 downloads
Attached File  Diabolik.X1600Pro.512.OpenMarkresult.txt   2.82KB   34 downloads

Ive got a couple more cards but they are agp and i cant use agpgart so ill post anyway but i have to get that machine updated:P

lets see some more benches so we can have a nice comparison!
-DiaboliK

#3
alicheusz

alicheusz

    InsanelyMac Sage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 316 posts
  • Gender:Male
GF 6600 TC on 10.4.9 kernel 8.9.1, I am curious how this benchmark is depended on CPU I have celeron 2.53GHz

Attached Files



#4
DiaboliK

DiaboliK

    DiaboliK <- Capital K!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,336 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hollyweird, CA

GF 6600 TC on 10.4.9 kernel 8.9.1, I am curious how this benchmark is depended on CPU I have celeron 2.53GHz



this doesnt bech your cpu just your gpu and opengl.

#5
linuxkid

linuxkid

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Just Joined
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
Hackintosh specs:
AMD Athlon 64 x2 4200
1GB Corsair Ram
Gigabyte K8N Pro SLi
(1) XFX Geforce 7900GT Overclocked

OSX 10.4.8
Semethex 8.8.1 kernel
Natit Universal Installer


Attached File  OpenMark.png   51.27KB   84 downloads

#6
alc0h0lic

alc0h0lic

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 151 posts
  • Location:[ NL FTW! ]
GMA950 @ 1600x1200x32 = 609 Points... yeah it suxx bigtime :P

#7
ritalin

ritalin

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 67 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A dull, bluish green, planet
GMA950 @ 1024x768x32 = 720
Nvidia 6200 PCI @ 1280x1024x32 = 5807

Both on a Asrock conroe 945G-DVI with a C2D 1.87GHz E6300 and 1Gb Ram.

#8
Zulu.Walker

Zulu.Walker

    InsanelyMac Sage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 338 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Film/TV Post-Production<br />Independent Films<br />Music<br />Literatur...
Can't run the bench at any other resolutions other than 1152x870x32 (crashes when switching to fullscreen), my desktop is at 1280x1024x32. Everything works fine otherwise, the app scared me. Natit Dual v.02 with 10.4.9 kexts, more at sig.

Palit Geforce 7600GT 256MB PCIe
Openmark Score: 16040 Attached File  OpenMark_result.txt   3.71KB   36 downloads

Attached File  OpenMark_result.jpg   31.8KB   18 downloads

#9
Korrupted

Korrupted

    Wandering Samurai

  • Retired
  • 1,623 posts
  • Location:Wandering the world over.
  • Interests:Mac<br />Laptops
Pentium 4 3Ghz HTT
2GB DDR
200GB HDD
10.4.8[8.8.1]
1680x1050x32 res
7900GS stock

Attached Files



#10
consolation

consolation

    I am not expendable, I'm not stupid and I'm not going.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 878 posts
:) I'm surprised to see 7600GTs scoring higher then 7900GS' and very close to 7900GTs, I suspect something is very unwell with kext's responsible for 7900s.


All benchies below were run at stock speeds.... Good old 9800, still pulling it's weight, damn that was a good card.

Attached Files



#11
redcell

redcell

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 58 posts
Sapphire Ati Radeon x1600xt 256MB DDR3

Posted Image

#12
kle500

kle500

    InsanelyMac Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece
Although i couldn't run the bench on my EIZO CRT, i changed monitors and on my Mitsubishi CRT i got the following results
Graphics = Gainward 7600GS passive Stock speed

Attached Files



#13
iRed

iRed

    Cinematographer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 381 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Europe
ATI MSI x1950xtx stock
SCORE : 16040

Posted Image

#14
SA22C

SA22C

    Escaping the Reality Distortion Field

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 333 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Soviet Kanukistan
Well this makes me feel a bit better about my 7900 GTO. xBench had it running at around 160, which is quite a bit slower than my buddy's x1600 in his Macbook Pro. I'll be interested to see what his card gets in OpenMark. My result was a 23,557.

Attached File  OpenMark_Result.jpg   123.61KB   23 downloads

#15
Korrupted

Korrupted

    Wandering Samurai

  • Retired
  • 1,623 posts
  • Location:Wandering the world over.
  • Interests:Mac<br />Laptops

:blink: I'm surprised to see 7600GTs scoring higher then 7900GS' and very close to 7900GTs, I suspect something is very unwell with kext's responsible for 7900s.


I was running the benchmark in 1680x1050 resolution. The 7600GT was running in 1100x700 or something like that. :P

#16
postaldave

postaldave

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Donators
  • 99 posts
  • Location:USSR
i really don't understand these numbers.

in consolation's post there is a 7600GT with a score of 16,040
and a 7600GS with a score of 10,396

but the GT was at 9 FPS
and theGS was 363 FPS


here is the part i don't understand, how does the GT get higher score
running 9FPS? that just doesn't make sense.





#17
SA22C

SA22C

    Escaping the Reality Distortion Field

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 333 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Soviet Kanukistan
The FPS probably dropped when the screenshot was taken...

#18
DiaboliK

DiaboliK

    DiaboliK <- Capital K!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,336 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hollyweird, CA

i really don't understand these numbers.

in consolation's post there is a 7600GT with a score of 16,040
and a 7600GS with a score of 10,396

but the GT was at 9 FPS
and theGS was 363 FPS


here is the part i don't understand, how does the GT get higher score
running 9FPS? that just doesn't make sense.





the bottom fps is just the fps thats currently going. if you used the tga that it output it would usally be 9fps.
screenshots will vary

#19
ritalin

ritalin

    InsanelyMac Protégé

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 67 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A dull, bluish green, planet
So could we normalize the results somehow?
Normalized Result = (Width x Height x Depth x Score)/1000000000
Using that formula would give the following:

DaxTsurugi 7900GS
(1680 x 1050 x 32 x 15769)/1000000000
= 890

consolation 7600GT
(1440 x 900 x 32 x 16040)/1000000000
= 665

My Nvidia 6200 PCI
(1280 x 1024 x 32 x 5807)/1000000000
= 243

SA22C 7900 GTO
(1280 x 1024 x 32 x 23557)/1000000000
= 988

Does this make sense or am I talking {censored}?

#20
SA22C

SA22C

    Escaping the Reality Distortion Field

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 333 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Soviet Kanukistan
That seems reasonable...





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

© 2014 InsanelyMac  |   News  |   Forum  |   Downloads  |   OSx86 Wiki  |   Mac Netbook  |   PHP hosting by CatN  |   Designed by Ed Gain  |   Logo by irfan  |   Privacy Policy