88 replies to this topic

[jfpoole]

Hi folks,

I'm John, the developer behind Geekbench. I thought I'd let y'all know that there's a new version of Geekbench available.  I think Geekbench 2.0 is a huge improvement over Geekbench 2006, and I hope you'll think so, too.

You can download both the Mac OS X and Windows versions of Geekbench 2.0 from the Geekbench website.

If you've got any questions, please let me know.

[Colonel]

Awesome work, jfpoole.

[The Baron]

Ramm, on Mar 6 2007, 09:24 PM, said:

Let's see how well my X86 system performs....

This is what I get for having a hackintosh:

http://browse.geekbe...kbench2/view/95

And mine....

http://browse.geekbe...bench2/view/103

Not bad for a Celeron!

[Colonel]

My iBook G3's, my MacBook's, and my AMD box's ratings.

http://browse.geekbe...user/profile/27

[Fiendskull9]

http://browse.geekbe...bench2/view/119



damn colonel and his bangin machines

colonels are made for chicken making!

not geekbenching!

-clay

[mac-mini]

let me get mine while i'm waiting for my serial number

EDIT: where is linux?

Edited by mac-mini, 06 March 2007 - 11:30 PM.

[Colonel]

I've created a patch that will allow Geekbench to run on 10.3.x-based Macs. More info and a download link are on my blog.

http://forum.insanel...p;showentry=232

[erbic]

Higher is better, right? I got around 3K on my Macbook Pro, but I can't remember the submitted result number. Let me re-run it...

EDIT: Here it is.... 3062.
http://browse.geekbe...bench2/view/129

Edited by ErBiC, 07 March 2007 - 12:11 AM.

[Soündless]

lets find out, who wants to start a donation thing?

[Kiko]

As long as i get the mac pro for testing purposes, im all for it.

I'll post my new geekbench when i get home, as usual, i expect myself to pwn everyone else.

[jfpoole]

Kiko, on Mar 6 2007, 10:56 PM, said:

As long as i get the mac pro for testing purposes, im all for it.

I really think that as the developer behind Geekbench, I should be the one that gets the system.  

Speaking of scores, you can view my Geekbench scores here.

[tops]

My GeekBench Score

Might I ask, what is LU Composition, and why did I score so terribly low on it? Hehe

[Kiko]

http://browse.geekbe...user/profile/44
/me does a little dance

Just wondering, is a 64-bit version in the works?

[lord_muad_dib]

does it work on a PIII 500 mhz? that's what i have here at work

Platform: Windows x86 (32-bit)
Compiler: Visual C++ 2005
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional
Model: IBM 6893520
Motherboard: IBM 6893520
Processor:
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 7 Stepping 3
Logical Processors: 1
Physical Processors: 1
Processor Frequency: 497 MHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 0.00 B
L1 Data Cache: 0.00 B
L2 Cache: 512 KB
L3 Cache: 0.00 B
Bus Frequency: 100.0 MHz
Memory: 320 MB
Memory Type: SDRAM 10 MHz
SIMD: 1

Integer (Score: 316)
Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 269, 1.0, 11.8 MB/sec
Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 288, 1.0, 11.8 MB/sec
Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 288, 1.0, 946.4 KB/sec
Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 278, 1.0, 935.1 KB/sec
Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 320, 1.0, 1.32 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 325, 1.0, 1.30 MB/sec
Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 328, 1.0, 2.71 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 322, 1.0, 2.71 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 306, 1.0, 5.15 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 315, 1.0, 5.15 Mpixels/sec
Crafty Chess single-threaded scalar -- 319, 1.0, 161.3 Knodes/sec
Crafty Chess multi-threaded scalar -- 330, 1.0, 160.3 Knodes/sec
Lua single-threaded scalar -- 370, 1.0, 142.6 Knodes/sec
Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 369, 1.0, 142.2 Knodes/sec

Floating Point (Score: 300)
Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 322, 1.0, 214.4 Mflops
Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 327, 1.0, 214.3 Mflops
Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 238, 1.0, 115.4 Mflops
Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 254, 1.0, 116.0 Mflops
Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 361, 3.8, 432.8 Mflops
Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 426, 3.8, 443.8 Mflops
LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 176, 1.0, 157.4 Mflops
LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 177, 1.0, 155.6 Mflops
Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 213, 1.0, 31.9 Mflops
Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 170, 1.0, 31.6 Mflops
Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 183, 1.0, 427.5 Kpixels/sec
Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 184, 1.0, 425.8 Kpixels/sec
Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 587, 1.0, 464.8 Kpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 587, 1.0, 462.0 Kpixels/sec

Memory (Score: 201)
Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 221, 1.0, 278.3 MB/sec
Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 289, 1.0, 203.1 MB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 252, 1.0, 941.5 Kallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 102, 1.0, 216.7 MB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 143, 1.0, 151.6 MB/sec

Stream (Score: 187)
Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 147, 1.0, 206.1 MB/sec
Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 236, 1.5, 314.3 MB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 150, 1.0, 199.8 MB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 216, 1.5, 299.3 MB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 156, 1.0, 241.8 MB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 242, 1.4, 346.0 MB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 172, 1.0, 243.8 MB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 181, 1.4, 348.2 MB/sec

[DiaboliK]

http://browse.geekbe...user/profile/36

so far thats just my 915gux dev kit clone.
my c2d cube gets 2646, but i have got to get the airport connected again (may be my u.fl connectors )

[jfpoole]

Kiko, on Mar 7 2007, 04:41 AM, said:

Just wondering, is a 64-bit version in the works?

There is a 64-bit version in the works, and it'll be made available around the time Leopard is released (it'll be Leopard-only, too, given the 64-bit limitations present in Tiger).

[adriandkicks]

http://browse.geekbe...bench2/view/225

Thats for the system in my sig

Edited by adriandkicks, 08 March 2007 - 08:15 AM.

[iRed]

I got http://browse.geekbe...ench2/view/2325

My result is good.
I'll make some new tests when i get new fan cooler.Ill   try to get 3.6Ghz