Conan Obrien Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 (edited) well there is lots of controversy about {censored} marriage and all that stuff... what do you think about {censored}? .. are they immoral? should they not be let to marry? i think they are moral and they should be allowed to marry Edited January 29, 2007 by Conan Obrien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killbot1000 Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 I don't see the problem with it, if they like it, let em do it, they are two consenting adults, they are not hurting anybody, whats the freakin harm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadiekiller Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 There really shouldn't be a problem about this. its not like it hurts anyone. its not like it even matters that much in the end of your life. it really just lets people live happy lives. if you share my beliefs (no after life or anything like that), then there is absolutely no reason to restrict anyones happiness. if you really don't want people to be happy based on your beliefs, mabye you should go back and read your guiding principles again. practically every religion preaches being nice to others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alessandro17 Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Odd you should start such a topic right when the members of the Italian government are having a bad argument about giving non married couples (including of course heteros) some fundamental rights similar to those of married couples. It seems that by far the majority of Italians is in favor. The Catholic Church is dead against. It doesn't surprise me a bit: in the seventies they opposed divorce and abortion. They oppose anything which can take away power from their filthy hands. However your options in the poll are too far apart. Probably many people would rather vote for something in between. As to {censored} people being immoral and going to hell, that is absolutely preposterous: I believe in God, but I don't recognize any religion. I am more than convinced that every form of love is more than welcome in the eyes of God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
consolation Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 (edited) well there is lots of controversy about {censored} marriage and all that stuff... what do you think about {censored}? .. are they immoral? should they not be let to marry? i think they are moral and they should be allowed to marry What the bleep has morality got to do with marriage!? Don't you know that Edited January 29, 2007 by consolation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conan Obrien Posted January 29, 2007 Author Share Posted January 29, 2007 Odd you should start such a topic right when the members of the Italian government are having a bad argument about giving non married couples (including of course heteros) some fundamental rights similar to those of married couples. im not italian nor am i from italy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alessandro17 Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 im not italian nor am i from italy... I realize that. That is why it is an odd coincidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alessandro17 Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Prostitution is the rental of the body, Marriage is the SALE! An old one, but still very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AldousHxlE Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Here in the US the right-wing Christian community fights to keep {censored} marriage illegal, with the help of Dubbya of course. They base it on the "fact" that the Bible forbids it. But wait, isn't banning {censored} marriage in the US illegal in itself? What happened to the separation Church and State in this country? Just a thought. Oh, and I have no probs with {censored} being married. It's none of my, or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alessandro17 Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Oh, and I have no probs with {censored} being married. It's none of my, or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned. The Pope and his followers here say that {censored} marriage would destroy the traditional marriage between a man and a woman. Nonsense of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marliwahoo Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 The poll questions are not very good. How about: How someone else lives is none of my business but we should not change the definition of marriage. Most any domestic partnership (of age adult humans) should have full rights under the law but should not be called marriage. (becasue it isn't) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U.C. Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 (edited) I believe its their life, let them do what they want to. Wanna get married, so be it. Why should I care or interfere in their business?? Marriage is just a word, but people who believe its holy or whatever, call it a partnership or something. Seriously it should not be such a big deal. Edited January 29, 2007 by Unstable Connection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macgirl Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 But wait, isn't banning {censored} marriage in the US illegal in itself? What happened to the separation Church and State in this country? It is not the only country that the church and the state are separate by the "law" or contitution, here the new secretary of social health care of teh new goverment banned some advances in AIDS prevention by his beliefs (traditional/conservative party of course). :censored2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killbot1000 Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 The poll questions are not very good. How about: How someone else lives is none of my business but we should not change the definition of marriage. Most any domestic partnership (of age adult humans) should have full rights under the law but should not be called marriage. (becasue it isn't) It isnt the same as marriage, thats why its called "{censored} marriage". and plus, who cares, if you want to be with somebody, the marriage certificate shouldnt change how you feel about them, thats just...wierd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macgirl Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 It isnt the same as marriage, thats why its called "{censored} marriage". and plus, who cares, if you want to be with somebody, the marriage certificate shouldnt change how you feel about them, thats just...wierd. No that does not change anything about the feeling, but in some countries married couples has benefits, like inusrance policies, health care, inheritance (testament thing), even some comercial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lostgame Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Marriage is just a document that says you're together. It's about the relationship, not the document. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killbot1000 Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 No that does not change anything about the feeling, but in some countries married couples has benefits, like inusrance policies, health care, inheritance (testament thing), even some comercial. Exactly, so they should have the same rights as strait people in that regard, since they obviously cant and shouldnt pretend to be somebody that they're not (unless they dont care about being happy with who they are). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embio Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 I could flame and flame and flame all day about ****ing evangelical christians. Or religion in general, but mainly evangelicals. I'll stop here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zealot Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 (edited) No that does not change anything about the feeling, but in some countries married couples has benefits, like inusrance policies, health care, inheritance (testament thing), even some comercial. Thats true, in most of the countries {censored} people want to be married and be recognized legally (i mean with legal benefits too). i have no problem with {censored} people getting married by the way. Edited January 30, 2007 by Zealot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollcage Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 What happened to the separation Church and State in this country? Shhh, there isn't really one, it's just a charade put on by the government. Why do you think that the ten commandments are displayed at practically every court room in the US? And when witnesses swear on the Bible. If someone wants to be with another person of the same sex, I don't think our government should be able to stop them. And if they plan on spending the rest of their lives together, I don't see why they shouldn't be given the same rights as a couple of opposite sex. [offtopic]By the way, anyone hear about that government official that was scrutinized because he wanted to take his oath of office in the Koran instead of the Bible? There's just something wrong with that. [/offtopic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwprod12 Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 I hate {censored} people. They should rot in hell. Muahahahaa!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embio Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 I'm the most tolerant person in the world, but come on! How is it that a perfectly normal, rational human being lives on the same planet as this idiot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwprod12 Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 (edited) If you're talking about me... it was a joke... I'm the biggest homo on the board. (I thought everyone knew that) EDIT: I'd like to point out that 6 people voted for immoral/hell, and I'm the only one with the courage to actually say it. And I dont even believe in morality or hell. Edited January 30, 2007 by gwprod12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AldousHxlE Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 (edited) It is not the only country that the church and the state are separate by the "law" or contitution, here the new secretary of social health care of teh new goverment banned some advances in AIDS prevention by his beliefs (traditional/conservative party of course). We have a similar situation here in the US as well concerning stem cell research. Imagine all those lives scientists could begin saving if they were allowed to continue researching this subject. But hey, God forbid we play.........uh........ God. And rollcage, let's not forget the ever popular debate on school prayers. Oh, and how bout those southern politicians fighting to force schools to teach Creationism over Evolution? Absolutely absurd Didn't mean to take the topic off course. Carry on..... Edited January 30, 2007 by AldousHxlE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sazpaimon Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Where's the "I don't care and I don't think anyone should get married" option? In all honesty, it doesn't matter to me. If {censored} people feel they want to have the same sufferings that marriage can bring to straight people, so be it. Personally I'd say not being able to get married is the ultimate excuse: "You know I'd marry you if I could, but it's illegal, so let's just have sex kthx." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts