Fugu Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Josh Aas just posted a new set of Firefox, Thunderbird and Camino builds. First spotted in his blog, which then points to http://wiki.mozilla.org/Mac:Intel http://josh.trancesoftware.com/mozilla/fir...5.intel.mac.dmg http://josh.trancesoftware.com/mozilla/thu...5.intel.mac.dmg http://josh.trancesoftware.com/mozilla/Cam...0.intel.mac.dmg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urig-herb Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Josh Aas just posted a new set of Firefox, Thunderbird and Camino builds.First spotted in his blog, which then points to http://wiki.mozilla.org/Mac:Intel http://josh.trancesoftware.com/mozilla/fir...5.intel.mac.dmg http://josh.trancesoftware.com/mozilla/thu...5.intel.mac.dmg http://josh.trancesoftware.com/mozilla/Cam...0.intel.mac.dmg Great! Seems that we get now "official" builds! Has anyone tested them yet? So far I'm perfectly happy with the 1.6a version from pu7o. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acid_Burn Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Great! Seems that we get now "official" builds! Has anyone tested them yet? So far I'm perfectly happy with the 1.6a version from pu7o. Firefox works not for my Mactel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pakoto Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Firefox works not for my Mactel It works for me with same hardware. Do you have maxxus 10.4.2 patch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acid_Burn Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 It works for me with same hardware. Do you have maxxus 10.4.2 patch? Yes, i have... and Colloquy works... but after start today Colloquy don´t work.... i don´t understand.... /edit: okay, it´s run... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ut2211 Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 I have the maxxuss 10.4.2 patch and the 3 applications do not work. Even using the original kernel they do not work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuruu Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 they work for me with maxxuss 10.4.2 patch and sse3 cpu... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myzar Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 wfm with maxxuss 10.4.2 patch and a sse2 cpu , i've installed all my extensions too, nice build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urig-herb Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 wfm with maxxuss 10.4.2 patch and a sse2 cpu , i've installed all my extensions too, nice build Is it a 1.5b or 1.6a build? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myzar Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Is it a 1.5b or 1.6a build? 1.5 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20051021 Firefox/1.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pet1 Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Anyway to get flash to work with this build? Assuming 7 works since 8 doesn't yet. I tried reinstalling 7 but still no flash. All my other browsers work with 7 no problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urig-herb Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Anyway to get flash to work with this build? Assuming 7 works since 8 doesn't yet. I tried reinstalling 7 but still no flash. All my other browsers work with 7 no problem. This is probably a x86 only build. The Flash plugin is ppc only. The two don't work together. I assume that you run all you other browsers with rosetta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pet1 Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Using safari 2.01 ppc and firefox ppc. Both using flash 7. Is there a universal flash 7? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtraa Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 wow, this thing is F*A*S*T. Firefox is even faster than safari. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pet1 Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Do u have flash working? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtraa Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Do u have flash working? Sorry mate, no flash here yet, too But well, Safari also did not load flash here, and after browsing the web without flash for a while now, I really don't miss it anymore. No more nasty flash-ads, and well, most sites with flash are uninteresting because they really {censored} me of with that animated menues §$%&/ So i think it is relaxing, having no flash at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pet1 Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Haha, wow, your glass is overflawing with optimism. That's cool though. I though, enjoy the animated stuff. Some if it is funny. Anway. It is quick. But I wonder if it is as fast once flash is used. Something to look into maybe. I would say safari 2.01 wtih flash 7 gives us the most compatable solution. It's pretty fast too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urig-herb Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 It works for me with the maxxuss 10.4.2 patch. Seems that we are getting some kind of "official" builds now. So it is possible to build 1.5 versions, which is great because of the better extension compatibilty in comparison to the 1.6a version from pu7o (thank you anyway for your efforts!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerdell86 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Weird: the updated Camino here crashes immediately on my Dell when executed. The regular Camino I downloaded from the site works well enough, if slowly. (I was hoping an Intel port would be a bit quicker). Opera 1.0a is BLAZINGLY fast, but the download manager crashes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takuro Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 ............................................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugu Posted October 27, 2005 Author Share Posted October 27, 2005 Dont forget that these builds are most certainly compiled on Mac OS 10.4.3 (seeded to developers), so they might be unstable or dont work at all on 10.4.1 and 10.4.2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts