kobe80 Posted January 10, 2017 Share Posted January 10, 2017 Hi friends,I'm getting a low geekbench score (around 18,800) with my 6800K systemMy system:Asus X99-A 6800K (6-core 3.4 ghz)64 gb ram Sierra i tried putting nullcpu in my kext folder on EFI. didn't do anything. Attached is my config.plist config.plist.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted January 10, 2017 Share Posted January 10, 2017 Nullcpu totally kills PM why using it if your system works without it! Try to create a SSDT for your skylake cpu using the piker script instead, or enable HWP on clover, I suggest the second option (you can't use both)... just add these lines to the config.plist under CPU: <key>HWPEnable</key> <true/> 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobe80 Posted January 10, 2017 Author Share Posted January 10, 2017 Nullcpu totally kills PM why using it if your system works without it! Try to create a SSDT for your skylake cpu using the piker script instead, or enable HWP on clover, I suggest the second option (you can't use both)... just add these lines to the config.plist under CPU: <key>HWPEnable</key> <true/> even without nullcpu.. same score (just under 19k).. the config lines.. are those complete? or should it have more to it? also is there a good place to put that in Clover Configurator? i can easily put it in manually but it's nice to use Clover Configurator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JahStories Posted January 10, 2017 Share Posted January 10, 2017 it's eneble hwp in clover configurator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobe80 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 it's eneble hwp in clover configurator. I did so, and i think it might have helped it boot quicker! but geekbench is still low. last one was 17,679 & the only reason the other ones were higher was bc i guess it was mildly overclocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sphinx777 Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Same issues here using Alienware 13 - 5500U (Broadwell) + GTX 960M. I have another computer (Dell 7348) without a dedicated video card with the same processor and the Geekbench reaches close to 6000. At Alienware it accuses the meager 2800. Using Handbrake, on first laptop the video is converted to 1h. In the other it arrives at 4 hours! I tried to change something in Bios but without success since it presents very few alternatives. I'm still studying what to do but to no avail so far. It looks like some bug or function related to the CPU since Alienware can only boot if I put cpus = 1 (on the other computer this is not necessary). Of course it`s assumptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zebulon Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 The 'xcpm performance fix 1 (wrsmr fix to get CPU max) © okrasit' kernel patch might help to improve your multicore Geekbench results: Patch: 89D8C1E008B99901 to B800FF0000B99901 On my X99 - 10.12.3 I saw a significant improvement . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobe80 Posted February 7, 2017 Author Share Posted February 7, 2017 The 'xcpm performance fix 1 (wrsmr fix to get CPU max) © okrasit' kernel patch might help to improve your multicore Geekbench results: Patch: 89D8C1E008B99901 to B800FF0000B99901 On my X99 - 10.12.3 I saw a significant improvement . Will try. Thanks! Also, should i have -xcpm in boot args? Sorry mate,what u meen ? can u share your EFI Folder please ? The 'xcpm performance fix 1 (wrsmr fix to get CPU max) © okrasit' kernel patch might help to improve your multicore Geekbench results: Patch: 89D8C1E008B99901 to B800FF0000B99901 On my X99 - 10.12.3 I saw a significant improvement . Also, what are you GeekBenching at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts